Trump Plays at Permanent War

Published in El País
(Spain) on 5 May 2018
by Sami Naïr (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Marta Quirós Alarcón. Edited by Margaret Dalzell.

 

 

For the president, politics is a game based on lies and one-sided decisions.

Dangerous and chaotic, Donald Trump's strategy for the Middle East seeks to meet two central goals: the restoration of the U.S.'s imperial role in the face of the Russia-Iran axis and, more significantly, clearly linking Israel with Saudi Arabia — sworn enemies of Iran — and turning them into key allies going forward. This Washington-Riyadh-Tel Aviv axis creates the conditions for rebuilding the entire Middle East under America's leadership.

This is a return to the former containment strategy for Iranian nationalism (its modern version being Shia Islam), looming over Israel as a military vector, and reactionary Sunni Islam (Wahhabism) acting as a Trojan horse inside the Muslim world. It is also a blow to the strategic pivot toward Asia promoted by Barack Obama. If the gamble turns out to be successful, the U.S. could have decades of hegemony against Russia and Europe ahead of it. But to realize this challenge implies, as a prerequisite, the destruction of Iran, which is more complex than Trumpist warriors and ideologues believe.

The intention to denounce the nuclear agreement signed by the U.S., Europe, Russia, and China with Iran falls into line with this context, and it is only the first step in reaching those goals.*
Trump behaves as if he didn't know perfectly well that Iran respects the deal — that there is no proof of its breach. But once more, the fiction of George W. Bush's 2003 weapons of mass destruction against Iraq is reprised, with Benjamin Netanyahu playing jester. It is a criminal ploy aimed at manipulating world public opinion and making Saudi Arabia, which is destroying Yemen, the region's main policeman, a role King Solomon would be easily willing to fulfill.

On the other hand, breaking the agreement means proving, once more, that Europe cannot aspire to play a role in the region (except to provide funds when necessary), and the trade war Washington has declared against Brussels has a dimension of geopolitical neutralization. This is how Trump’s latest rant should be understood: Europe was created to be against the U.S.

Israel, wanting to get even for its failure against Hezbollah in 2006, seeks to paralyze the aid provided by Iran to that Lebanese militia in order to launch another war. This explains the bombing of Lebanese militia positions and Syrian military facilities. The American president acts this way because, for him, politics is just, at its core, another version of the ultraspeculative capitalism he defends: It is a game based on lies and one-sided decision-making. In this worldview, politics is a mere form of struggle, just like economy and commerce. Diplomacy must cater to force, not replace it.

That said, in the Middle East, history lessons teach other truths; force can cause damage, but it is powerless against the people’s resistance. Against the country of the ayatollahs, the game of Trump’s permanent war may end up on the road to Calvary.

*Editor’s note: President Trump withdrew the United States from the Iran nuclear agreement, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, on May 8, 2018. The 2015 agreement was signed by the permanent members of the U.N. Security Council (the United States, United Kingdom, Russia, France and China) plus Germany and the European Union.


Trump juega a la guerra permanente

Para el mandatario, la política es un juego basado en mentiras y decisiones unilaterales

Peligrosa y caótica, la estrategia de Donald Trump en Oriente Medio persigue dos objetivos centrales: restablecer el papel imperial de EE UU frente al eje Rusia-Irán y, de modo más significativo, vincular claramente a Israel con Arabia Saudí —enemigos acérrimos de Irán—, que se han vuelto, en adelante, aliados principales. Este eje Washington-Riad-Tel Aviv crea las condiciones para recomponer todo Oriente Próximo bajo la batuta americana.

Es el retorno de la antigua estrategia de contención del nacionalismo iraní (versión moderna en forma de islamismo chií), gravitando sobre Israel como vector militar, y el islamismo suní reaccionario (el wahabismo) como caballo de Troya dentro del mundo musulmán. Es también un golpe al balanceo estratégico hacia Asia impulsado por Barack Obama. Si la apuesta resulta exitosa, EE UU tendría por delante décadas de hegemonía frente a Rusia y Europa. Pero afirmar este reto supone, como premisa, la destrucción de Irán, lo que es más complejo de lo que piensan los ideólogos guerreros trumpistas.

La intención de denunciar el pacto nuclear firmado con Irán por EE UU, Europa, Rusia y China se inscribe en este contexto y solo es el primer paso para alcanzar esos objetivos. Donald Trump actúa sabiendo perfectamente que Irán respeta el acuerdo, que no hay prueba de violación del mismo: pero de nuevo se reproduce la ficción, con Netanyahu de bufón, de las armas de destrucción masiva de Bush en 2003 contra Irak. Estratagema criminal dirigida a manipular a la opinión pública mundial y hacer de Arabia Saudí, que está destruyendo Yemen, el principal gendarme de la región, papel que el rey Salmán se apresta de buen grado a cumplir.

Por otra parte, romper el pacto es demostrar, una vez más, que Europa no puede aspirar a un papel en la región (salvo aportar fondos cuando es necesario), y que la guerra comercial que Washington ha declarado contra Bruselas adquiere también una dimensión de neutralización geopolítica. Así se debe entender la última vociferación de Trump: “Europa ha sido creada contra EE UU”.

Israel, que quiere una revancha por su fracaso frente a Hezbolá en 2006, busca paralizar la ayuda que Irán aporta a esa milicia libanesa para emprender otra guerra. Ello explica los bombardeos sobre las posiciones de la milicia libanesa y las instalaciones militares sirias. El mandatario norteamericano actúa de este modo porque, para él, la política, en su esencia, es solo otra versión del capitalismo ultraespeculativo que defiende: se trata de un juego basado en mentiras y toma de decisión unilateral. En esta visión del mundo, la política es una mera forma de contienda, tanto como la economía y el comercio. La diplomacia debe servir a la fuerza, no la sustituye.

Ahora bien, en Oriente Próximo, las lecciones de la historia enseñan otras verdades; la fuerza daña pero no puede nada contra la resistencia de los pueblos. Frente al país de los ayatolás, el juego de la guerra permanente de Trump puede acabar en camino de calvario.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Canada: Carney Takes Us Backward with Americans on Trade

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Topics

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Ireland: We Must Stand Up to Trump on Climate. The Alternative Is Too Bleak To Contemplate

Related Articles

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*