America’s Russia Question: Face Up to the Crisis in Democratic Politics

Published in Asahi Shimbun
(Japan) on 20 April 2019
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Eric Stimson. Edited by Nkem Okafor.
Ordeals that threaten American democracy just keep erupting. This series of events make up the “Russia question.”

A report summarizing the results of a two-year investigation into the Russia question has been released. It confirms that Russia interfered in the previous presidential election, and examines contribution to Donald Trump’s campaign.

There was no evidence of conspiracy between the campaign and Russia. However, it sets aside the question of whether Trump illegally obstructed the investigation. That judgment has been left to Congress.

Congress is facing a situation where it should move beyond party and recognize the significance of the separation of powers. Can Congress monitor the president and fulfill its responsibility to protect against mischief? If Congress fails to have a discussion that U.S. citizens can agree with, it will further deepen a lack of faith in politics.

Information about repeated misuse of presidential power emerges from the report. It is clear that Trump put pressure on the investigation and acted coercively with respect to the investigation staff so he could avoid suspicion.

Trump will not be prosecuted due to the limits set by Justice Department policy which provides that a sitting president cannot be indicted pursuant to the department’s constitutional analysis and the difficulty of proving the president’s intent.

By replacing the FBI director and attorney general when they refused his requests related to the investigation, Trump issued a presidential challenge to administrative ethics. Even if Trump cannot be prosecuted, it is obvious that his political responsibility should be thoroughly investigated.

Unfortunately, the reactions of the two parties in Congress are totally different. While the opposition Democratic Party is emphasizing the president’s malfeasance, the ruling Republican Party is trying to pull a curtain over the matter to appease the president.

From the beginning, it could be said that this “Russia question” has exposed a longstanding illness in American politics, namely the divisive policy of putting partisan interests and priorities above everything else.

Shutting down the government over a failure to resolve the federal budget was a drag on the life of citizens and on the economy. This also occurred under the the Obama, when political malfunction was a factor in the downgrade of American debt.

The “Russia question” that originated with the presidential election and gave birth to the Trump phenomenon is an extension of this ugly political conflict.

A campaign that resorted to any means available to pound its opponents and win the election. A president that scurries to protect himself even when meddling by a foreign intelligence agency is uncovered. And above all, a party that only sees the problem in terms of its partisan interests …

Realistically speaking, the outlook for a congressional inquiry into the truth is dark. Both parties will likely manipulate the handling of the issue as it scrutinizes public opinion ahead of next year’s presidential and congressional elections.

When will the American political sector face up to the danger posed to American politics by its endless squabbling? The international community gazes at the self-righteous "America First" diplomacy and the division and confrontation in American domestic politics through sad eyes.



米国の民主主義を脅かす試練が幾重にも噴き出している。それが「ロシア疑惑」をめぐる一連の動きであろう。

 2年に及ぶ捜査結果をまとめた報告書が公表された。前回の大統領選挙にロシアが介入した事実を認定したうえで、トランプ陣営の関与を調べた。

 陣営とロシアとの共謀を示す証拠はなかった。しかし、トランプ大統領が捜査を違法に妨げたか否かの結論は見送った。その判断は議会に委ねている。

 議会は党派を超えて、三権分立の重みを認識すべき局面だ。大統領を監視し、暴走を防ぐ責任を果たせるか。国民が納得できる審議を尽くさねば、政治不信がさらに深まるだろう。

 報告書から浮かび上がったのは、大統領権力の乱用ぶりである。捜査当局への圧力と人事権の強行には、疑惑逃れの狙いがあったのは明らかだ。

 それでも訴追しないのは、現職大統領は憲法解釈上、起訴できないとする司法省の立場や、大統領の意図を立証する難しさなどの壁があるからだ。

 捜査をめぐる要求をのまなかったFBI長官と司法長官を更迭した経緯などは、大統領による行政倫理への挑戦である。訴追できずとも、政治責任が厳しく追及されるのは当然だ。

 ところが残念ながら、議会は与野党でまったく受け止め方が異なる。野党民主党は大統領の不正を強調するのに対し、与党共和党は大統領に迎合するように幕引きしようとしている。

 そもそもこの「ロシア疑惑」は、長く続いている米国政治の病が表出したものともいえる。それは、党利党略が何より優先される分断政治である。

 予算編成の論争が収まらずに政府が閉鎖され、国民生活や経済の足を引っぱる。そんな状態はオバマ前政権時にも起き、政治の機能不全は米国債の格下げの一因にもなった。

 トランプ現象を生んだ大統領選を起点とする「ロシア疑惑」もその延長線上にある醜い政争の一端である。

 政敵をたたいて選挙に勝つには手段を選ばぬ候補陣営。外国情報機関による介入が発覚しても、保身に走る大統領。それでも党派の利害を通じてしか問題を見ようとしない政党……。

 現実的には今後、議会での真相究明がすすむ見通しは暗い。与野党とも、来年の大統領選・議会選に向けて世論の動向をうかがいつつ、疑惑の取り扱いを左右させるだろう。

 果てしない政争がもたらす米民主政治の危うさを、米政界はいつになれば直視できるのか。国際社会は、米国第一主義の独善外交とともに、米内政の分断と対立を憂鬱(ゆううつ)な目で見ている。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Singapore: TikTok Deal Would Be a Major Win for Trump, but Not in the Way You Might Expect

Germany: Trump Declares War on Cities

Japan: US Signing of Japan Tariffs: Reject Self-Righteousness and Fulfill Agreement

Pakistan: US Debt and Global Economy

Singapore: Several US Trade ‘Deals’ Later, There Are Still More Questions than Answers

Topics

Turkey: Will the US Be a Liberal Country Again?

Singapore: TikTok Deal Would Be a Major Win for Trump, but Not in the Way You Might Expect

Pakistan: US Debt and Global Economy

Mexico: Qatar, Trump and Venezuela

Mexico: Nostalgia for the Invasions

Malaysia: The Tariff Trap: Why America’s Protectionist Gambit Only Tightens China’s Grip on Global Manufacturing

Singapore: Several US Trade ‘Deals’ Later, There Are Still More Questions than Answers

Related Articles

Turkey: Will the US Be a Liberal Country Again?

Singapore: TikTok Deal Would Be a Major Win for Trump, but Not in the Way You Might Expect

Pakistan: US Debt and Global Economy

Mexico: Qatar, Trump and Venezuela

Previous article
Next article