Conflict Over Iran Deal Shows that Europe Must Be Able To Act Without US

Published in Aftenposten
(Norway) on 11 May 2019
by Aftenposten Editorial Board (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Laura Falender. Edited by Denile Doyle.
This week Iran threatened to walk away from parts of the nuclear deal that was negotiated in 2015. More concretely, Iran will keep its surplus of enriched uranium instead of selling it to foreign countries, which they committed to as part of the deal. The country also threatens to begin producing highly-enriched uranium.

There is every reason to be critical of the Iranian regime. It oppresses its own people and contributes to instability in the whole region. But the main reason the deal is at risk of falling apart is not Iran at all, but rather the irresponsible solo act of the U.S. It has now been a year since president Donald Trump, despite strong objections from his nearest allies, withdrew the U.S. from the deal and reinstated severe sanctions against Iran.

Russia, China, and the European countries that negotiated the deal all remain committed to it for making the world safer. They have attempted to keep it alive, but unfortunately this has proven difficult. The American sanctions have worked well and have sent Iran’s economy into a deep crisis. Europe’s promise to work to maintain trade with Iran has resulted in hardly anything. Instex, a new instrument that was established to be able to trade with Iran, has been extremely time-consuming to put into place. The first transaction has not yet occurred.

The fundamental problem is that most international companies, in one way or another, are dependent on the U.S. domestic market, banking system, or currency. Few dare to do anything that would contravene the American sanctions. That would put them at risk of being prosecuted.

The halting attempts to save the Iran deal are a reminder of how much power the U.S. has over the global financial system. Despite China’s growth and the establishment of the Euro, the dollar has retained its place as the “global currency.” The dollar, for example, comprises over 60 percent of the currency reserves of central banks globally, according to the IMF.

The U.S. and EU have complementary interests on many issues, but not all, which Trump’s policies in the past years has shown. If the EU will be able to defend its economic and foreign policy interests, the union must position itself to act independently to a greater extent than it does today. This is something the conflict around the Iran deal illustrates well.

The U.S. and Iran are saber-rattling, and the deal’s fate remains unclear. The best that the European countries can do is continue to use the tools they have to avoid it breaking apart altogether.


Iran varslet denne uken at de går bort fra deler av atomavtalen som ble fremforhandlet i 2015. Helt konkret vil Iran beholde sitt overskudd av anriket uran istedenfor å selge det videre til utlandet, slik de forpliktet seg til gjennom avtalen. Landet truer også med å begynne å produsere høyanriket uran.
Det er all grunn til å være kritisk til det iranske regimet. Det undertrykker sin egen befolkning og bidrar til ustabilitet i hele regionen. Men hovedårsaken til at avtalen kan falle helt fra hverandre, er ikke Iran, men USAs uansvarlige sololøp. Det er nå et år siden president Donald Trump, til tross for sterke motforestillinger fra sine nærmeste allierte, trakk USA ut av avtalen og gjeninnførte strenge sanksjoner mot Iran.

Russland, Kina og de europeiske landene som forhandlet frem avtalen, står fast ved at den gjør verden tryggere. De har forsøkt å holde liv i den, men dessverre har det vist seg vanskelig. USAs sanksjoner har fungert godt og har sendt Irans økonomi inn i en dyp krise. Europas løfte om å jobbe for å opprettholde handelen med Iran, har munnet ut i lite. Instex, et nytt instrument som er blitt opprettet for å kunne gjennomføre handler med Iran, var svært tidkrevende å få på plass. Første transaksjon er ennå ikke gjennomført.

Det grunnleggende problemet er at de fleste internasjonale selskaper på en eller annen måte er avhengige av USAs hjemmemarked, banksystem eller valuta. Få tør ta sjansen på å gjøre noe som kan bryte med USAs sanksjonsregime. Da risikerer de å bli straffeforfulgt.
De haltende forsøkene på å redde Iran-avtalen er en påminnelse om hvor mye makt USA har over det globale finanssystemet. Til tross for Kinas fremvekst og opprettelsen av euroen, har dollaren holdt stand som «verdensvaluta». Dollar utgjør for eksempel over 60 prosent av sentralbankenes totale valutareserver globalt, ifølge IMF.
USA og EU har sammenfallende interesser i mange saker, men ikke i alle, noe Trumps politikk de siste årene har vist. Dersom EU skal kunne forsvare sine økonomiske og utenrikspolitiske interesser, må unionen i større grad være i stand til å handle på egen hånd enn i dag. Det er konflikten om Iran-avtalen en god illustrasjon på.
USA og Iran rasler med sablene, og avtalens videre skjebne er uklar. Det beste europeiske land kan gjøre, er å fortsette å bruke de virkemidlene de har for å unngå at den bryter helt sammen.

This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Afghanistan: State Capitalism in the US

Topics

Afghanistan: State Capitalism in the US

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Related Articles

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Israel: The Big Change: Even Trump Understands That 1 of His Big Dreams Will Not Be Fulfilled

Germany: Goodbye Rules-Based Trade Policy

United Arab Emirates: US-EU Trade Deal Leaves European Countries Unhappy