Global Leadership in Uncertain Times

Published in Clarín
(Argentina) on 21 February 2020
by Marita Carballo (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Jane Vogel. Edited by Margaret McIntyre.
As 2020 begins, we find a world in turmoil, with compelling signs of discontent in different regions and countries, and a marked crisis in global leadership.

Gallup International conducted its most recent End of Year poll this past November based on 50,261 interviews across 50 nations and representing nearly two-thirds of the world population. The data involved opinions about 12 government leaders or heads of State: Germany, France, Great Britain, China, India, Israel, Turkey, Russia, the United States, Brazil, Saudi Arabia and, also, the leader of the Catholic Church. The results were similar to last year.

First, Pope Francis is once again the most highly regarded leader in the world, being the only one among the 13 leaders in the poll with a majority of 53%, giving him a favorable rating, versus 23% giving an unfavorable rating and 24% who did not know or did not answer. Among the 50 countries polled, there were only six where Pope Frances received more unfavorable ratings than favorable: Syria, Jordan, Iraq, Serbia, Palestine and Pakistan. Five of those have a majority Muslim population.

The rest of the countries gave him a predominantly favorable rating.

Pope Francis received a majority of favorable ratings among respondents in the European Union, with an average of 64%, as well as 66% in Latin America, 51% in Africa, 55% in the U.S. and 51% in East Asia. The fact that the head of the Catholic Church evokes a positive image for half the population of Africa and Eastern Asia confirms his position as a global leader, even among non-Catholics.

He is followed by Angela Merkel, the best head of government with a 46% favorable rating and 31% unfavorable rating. French President Emmanuel Macron is in third place with a 40% positive rating and a 33% negative rating.

These are three leaders with whom the president of Argentina met in February this year on his European tour.

It should be noted that the three leaders with the most positive image in the world are not having the best of times. The Pope was unsuccessful in gaining approval from priests in the Amazon for the ordination of married men; Merkel is in the middle of her worst political crisis since she took office because her party allied itself with an ultra-right party in the German state of Thuringia; and Macron is confronting the most prolonged strike in the history of his country.

In spite of this, they are the only three leaders in the poll with a net positive score (the difference between positive and negative percentages): the Pope +30, the German chancellor +15 and the French president +7.

The other 10 government leaders had negative scores: Indian Prime Minister Modi -2, Boris Johnson -8, Turkish President Erdogan -10, Putin -12, Xi Jinping -12, the King of Saudi Arabia -12, [Brazilian President] Bolsonaro -14, [Iranian President] Rouhani -18, [Israeli President] Netanyahu -20, [President] Trump -27.

The leaders of the two most powerful countries in Eurasia — from the perspective of military strategy — have a more positive image than the U.S. president, who has the least positive image of the 13 leaders in the poll. So, the one with the most favorable image is the spiritual leader of the West, and the one with the worst image is the leader of the most important military power in this part of the world.

Russian President Vladimir Putin received a 37% favorable rating and a 48% negative rating. The regions where Putin is regarded more highly, according to favorable ratings, are Africa (54%) and Western Asia (48%). Opinions are divided in Russia, with 32% favorable and 33% unfavorable. Meanwhile, in the U.S., Putin has a 52% negative rating and only 6% positive, which can be explained by both the legacy of the Cold War and the current strategic dispute between the countries.

Once again, perhaps the most significant data is that which shows President Trump with the most unfavorable rating of all the leaders included in the poll. This was also true last year. On the global level, 58% of respondents gave him an unfavorable rating and 31% gave him a favorable rating. It is even worse in Western Europe, with unfavorable ratings at 78%, and in the Middle East, with 85% unfavorable ratings.

There were only seven countries among the 50 that gave Trump a majority positive rating: Vietnam, Nigeria, Albania, Philippines, Azerbaijan, Georgia, India and Armenia. The countries where the President of the United States had the most negative ratings were: Jordan, Germany, Syria, Finland, Austria, Lebanon, Spain, Palestine, Korea, Ireland, France and Mexico, where between 8 and 9 out of 10 have negative opinions about the U.S. president.

Furthermore, respondents were critical of world powers. The majority of the global population maintains that U.S. international policies destabilize the world. (54%, while 31% think that they stabilize the world.) Also, 49% think that Russia destabilizes the world, versus 32% saying that it stabilizes, and there is criticism of China’s policies, although somewhat less (43% destabilizing versus 34% stabilizing).

The European Union is the only world power that is well-regarded, with 50% thinking that its actions and policies stabilize the world versus 32% that think the opposite. In an environment of increasing global confrontation and division, Europe appears to be a focus of hope, although it is in a difficult situation that requires unity among its citizens and leaders. Global society is complex, even contradictory. As a whole, it seeks leadership that is characterized by moderation and balance.


Iniciado el 2020 encontramos un mundo muy convulsionado, con fuertes manifestaciones de descontento en distintas regiones y países y una marcada crisis de liderazgo global.
La última encuesta End of Year de Gallup International realizada en noviembre pasado en 50 naciones, en base a 50.261 entrevistas cubriendo cerca de dos tercios de la población mundial nos brinda información sobre cuál es la opinión sobre doce Jefes de estado o de gobierno: Alemania, Francia. Gran Bretaña, China, India, Israel, Turquía, Rusia, Estados Unidos Brasil, Arabia Saudita e Irán y además incluye al Jefe de la Iglesia Católica. Arroja resultados muy similares a la de un año atrás.
La primera conclusión es que es el Papa Francisco quien nuevamente concita las mejores opiniones en el ámbito global, siendo el único entre las trece personalidades medidas que encuentra una aprobación mayoritaria con 53% evaluándolo favorablemente versus 23% que opina desfavorablemente y un 24% que manifiesta que no conoce o contesta. Entre los 50 países medidos solo en seis, Francisco obtiene más opiniones negativas que positivas: Siria, Jordania, Irak, Serbia, Palestina y Pakistán. Cinco de ellos son de mayoría musulmana.
En los restantes países predominan las respuestas favorables.
El Papa Francisco obtiene calificaciones mayoritariamente positivas en los países de la Unión Europea, con un promedio de 64%, Latinoamérica 66%, África 51%, Estados Unidos 55% y Asia Oriental 51%. Que más de la mitad tenga imagen favorable del Jefe de la Iglesia Católica en el continente africano y en Asia Oriental, ratifica que se trata de una personalidad global, incluso entre quienes no profesan el catolicismo.
Le sigue luego Ángela Merkel, la jefa de gobierno mejor evaluada con 46% de opiniones a favor y 31% adversas. El tercer lugar lo ocupa el presidente de Francia Emmanuel Macron, con 40% de respuestas positivas y 33% de negativas.
Se trata de tres líderes con los cuales el presidente argentino se entrevistó en febrero de este año en su primera gira por los países de Occidente.
Cabe consignar que las tres figuras con mejor imagen en el ámbito global, no pasan por el mejor momento en el específico. El Papa no pudo avanzar con su idea de permitir la ordenación de hombres casados como sacerdotes en la Amazonia; Merkel se encuentra en la crisis política más difícil desde que asumió el gobierno, al aliarse su partido con la ultraderecha en Turingia y Macron viene de enfrentar la huelga más prolongada de la historia en su país.
Pese a ello, son los únicos tres sobre los trece medidos que tienen un net score positivo (diferencia entre opiniones positivas y negativas): el Papa +30, la Canciller alemana +15 y el Presidente francés +7. Los restantes diez dirigentes presentan scores negativos: el primer ministro de la India Modi -2, Boris Johnson -8%, el Presidente turco Erdogan -10, Putin -12, Xi Jimping -12; el Rey de Arabia Saudita también -12; Bolsonaro -14, el Presidente Rohuani -18; Netanyahu -20 Trump -27.
Los lideres de las dos potencias más importantes en Eurasia desde el punto de vista estratégico militar, tienen mejor imagen que el Presidente de E.EUU., que es el peor de los trece medidos. Es así como el que tiene mejor imagen es un líder espiritual de Occidente y el que tiene peor quien preside la potencia estratégica más importante de esta parte del mundo.
El presidente ruso Vladimir Putin obtuvo 37% de opiniones favorables y 48% de negativas. Las regiones donde es mejor visto, de acuerdo a la opinión positiva, son África (54%) y Asia Occidental (48%). En Rusia, las opiniones están divididas, con 32% a favor y 33% en contra, mientras en Estados Unidos, 52% está en contra y sólo 6% a favor, explicándose ello tanto por la herencia del antagonismo de la guerra fría, como por la disputa estratégica entre ambos países en el presente.
Nuevamente, quizás el dato más significativo, es que al igual que en la medición del año pasado, es Donald Trump quien obtuvo las opiniones más desfavorables ente los lideres medidos con 58% a nivel global de opiniones negativas y 31% de positivas. La crítica es más fuerte en Europa Occidental 78% y Medio Oriente 85%.
Los países en los que Trump tiene opinión mayoritariamente positiva son sólo 7 entre 50 medidos: Vietnam, Nigeria, Albania, Filipinas, Azerbaijan, Georgia, India y Armenia. Y las naciones donde el Presidente norteamericano tiene las opiniones más negativas son: Jordania, Alemania, Siria, Finlandia, Austria, Líbano, España, Palestina, Corea, Irlanda, Francia y México, en los que entre 8 y 9 cada 10 tienen opiniones negativas sobre el Presidente estadounidense.
A ello se suma la visión crítica de los ciudadanos frente a las grandes potencias. La mayoría en el ámbito global sostiene que las políticas internacionales de los Estados Unidos desestabilizan al mundo (54% y 31% piensan que estabilizan). También opina que Rusia desestabiliza un 49% contra 32% y se cuestiona la política de China, aunque algo menos (43% a 34%).
La única potencia bien conceptuada es la Unión Europea con 50% pensando que sus acciones y políticas estabilizan al mundo, contra 32% que piensa lo contrario. En un contexto de creciente confrontación y división en el mundo, Europa aparece como un foco de esperanza, aunque está en una situación muy difícil que requiere la unión de sus ciudadanos y dirigentes. La sociedad global es compleja y e incluso contradictoria. Como conjunto, busca un liderazgo caracterizado por la moderación y el equilibrio.


This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Turkey: Pay Up or Step Aside: Tariffs in America’s ‘Protection Money’ Diplomacy

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Ireland: Irish Examiner View: Would We Miss Donald Trump and Would a Successor Be Worse?

Australia: Australia Boosts Corporate Law Enforcement as America Goes Soft

Topics

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Ireland: We Must Stand Up to Trump on Climate. The Alternative Is Too Bleak To Contemplate

Canada: Carney Takes Us Backward with Americans on Trade

Related Articles

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Ireland: We Must Stand Up to Trump on Climate. The Alternative Is Too Bleak To Contemplate

Canada: Carney Takes Us Backward with Americans on Trade