Stealth Wars

Published in El País
(Spain) on 28 December 2020
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Marta Quirós Alarcón. Edited by Margaret McIntyre.
The EU must not remain indifferent in the face of the largest cyberattack in history.

The United States government suffered a massive cyberattack by hackers connected to the intelligence services of the Russian Federation and it almost went unnoticed. The surge in the pandemic and the bumpy presidential transition, together with a defeated president who refuses to admit the outcome of the election and still hopes to alter the verdict of the polls, have relegated the largest cyberattack ever suffered by a U.S. administration to the background.

This is not just another episode in the controversial relationship between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump, but a troubling case of persistent cyber espionage concerning every country which Russia seeks to disrupt, including members of the European Union, most of which are also members of NATO. Together with poisoning attacks on members of the Russian opposition and former secret agents carried out inside Europe, these cyberattacks not only constitute a Cold War approach, are are asymmetric warfare.

The White House has failed to respond to this security crisis which affects five U.S. agencies including the Departments of Treasury, State, Homeland Security, Energy and Commerce, and even the country's nuclear defense system. The crisis also affects private companies. Trump, the defeated president, blamed the attack on China, directly contradicting information provided by his own administration. This is hardly surprising for this belligerent character whom the Republican Party is beginning to abandon, particularly after he refused to sign a bipartisan budget relief bill to aid citizens and businesses affected by the pandemic and lockdowns. In contrast, President-elect Joe Biden has declared cybersecurity a priority, and said he is ready to face this attack from Day One of his presidency.

Trump’s presidency will remain linked in history to the activities of Putin’s intelligence services. They helped him win the presidency in 2017 and are making the most of his last months in office to infiltrate the government and obtain strategic information, ranging from information about nuclear weapons to the COVID-19 vaccine. For at least the past nine months, the U.S. cybersecurity agency has detected gradual, sophisticated and well organized cyber infiltration activity which poses a great threat to local, state and federal governments, and which may also affect other countries, businesses and European institutions.

The European Commission recently published its cybersecurity strategy around the same time the attack became known. This strategy relates to aspects of digital transformation included in the post-pandemic economic recovery plan. From the moment Biden takes office on Jan. 20, the arrival of the new Democratic administration must be an opportunity for Washington and Brussels to strengthen their cooperation in the face of the growing threat of infiltration by Russian intelligence services. At the cybersecurity level, the trans-Atlantic bond should be inspired by the principle of NATO, which considers an attack against any of its members as a threat to everyone’s safety.


Guerras sigilosas

La UE no debe quedar indiferente ante el mayor ciberataque de la historia

Casi ha pasado inadvertido el ciberataque masivo que acaba de sufrir el Gobierno de Estados Unidos por parte de piratas informáticos vinculados a los servicios secretos de la Federación Rusa. La curva ascendente de la pandemia y la accidentada transición presidencial, con un presidente derrotado que se niega a reconocer los resultados electorales y espera todavía corregir el veredicto de las urnas, han dejado en segundo plano el mayor ataque informático sufrido por la Administración estadounidense en la historia.

No se trata de un episodio más en la polémica relación entre Putin y Trump, sino de un caso preocupante de persistente ciberespionaje que concierne a todos los países con los que Rusia sostiene una actitud disruptiva, como es el caso de los socios de la Unión Europea, en su mayoría miembros además de la Alianza Atlántica. Sumados a los ataques químicos a miembros de la oposición rusa y a antiguos agentes secretos, incluso en territorio europeo, estos ciberataques conforman un cuadro de sigilosa actividad propia ya no de una guerra fría sino de guerras asimétricas.

La Casa Blanca ya no se ha ocupado de esta crisis de seguridad, que afecta a cinco departamentos —Tesoro, Estado, Seguridad Nacional, Energía y Comercio—, e incluso al sistema de defensa nuclear, además de a empresas privadas. El presidente derrotado, Donald Trump, ha atribuido el ataque a China, en abierta contradicción con las informaciones suministradas por su propia Administración. No es de extrañar en este personaje atrabiliario al que está empezando a abandonar el partido republicano, sobre todo después de su denegación de la firma presidencial al acuerdo presupuestario bipartidista para proporcionar ayudas a los ciudadanos y a las empresas afectadas por la pandemia y los confinamientos. El presidente electo, Joe Biden, en cambio, ha declarado prioritaria la ciberseguridad y se ha mostrado dispuesto a enfrentarse a este ataque desde el primer día de su presidencia.

La presidencia de Trump quedará vinculada para la historia a la actividad de los servicios secretos de Putin. Le ayudaron a alcanzar la presidencia en 2017 y están aprovechando los últimos meses de su mandato para infiltrarse en la Administración y obtener información estratégica, desde las armas nucleares hasta la vacuna contra la pandemia. En los últimos nueve meses, al menos, la agencia pública de ciberseguridad de Estados Unidos ha detectado una paciente, sofisticada y muy bien organizada actividad de penetración informática que significa un “grave riesgo” para los Gobiernos locales, estatales y federal, y que también puede afectar a países, empresas e instituciones europeas.

En los mismos días en que se ha conocido el ataque, la Comisión Europea acaba de publicar su estrategia de ciberseguridad, vinculada a los aspectos de transformación digital incluidos en el plan de recuperación económica posterior a la pandemia. La instalación de la nueva Administración demócrata a partir de la toma de posesión de Joe Biden, el 20 de enero, debe ser la oportunidad para que Washington y Bruselas estrechen su cooperación frente a la amenaza creciente de los servicios rusos. También en el plano de la ciberseguridad, el lazo transatlántico debe inspirarse en el principio del Tratado Atlántico que considera el ataque a cualquiera de los socios como un atentado a la seguridad de todos.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Afghanistan: State Capitalism in the US

Topics

Afghanistan: State Capitalism in the US

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Related Articles

Afghanistan: State Capitalism in the US

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*