South Korea’s Strategic Determination To Be Tested Under US Pressure

Published in Huanqiu
(China) on 21 May 2021
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Jaime Cantwell. Edited by Olivia Parker.
South Korean President Moon Jae-In, who is currently visiting the United States, is scheduled to meet with President Joe Biden in the early hours of Saturday morning Beijing time, and the parties will issue a joint statement. The Voice of America and other media have speculated that the issue of Taiwan will be mentioned, and they say that the strength of the language used by U.S. officials to discuss the issue will be no less than that of a joint statement by the U.S. and Japan.

One can imagine the urgent efforts by the United States to pull Korea into its united front against China, but we also believe that President Moon's administration will resist American pressure. This is because on the Taiwan issue central to Chinese national interests, giving support to the U.S. does not comport with Korea’s national interests, and amounts to Washington forcing Seoul to drink poison. We have also noticed how ambiguous the statements of American officials are, which reflects how their difficulty in working with President Moon.

Everyone knows that today's South Korea relies heavily on the U.S. for national security, and, therefore, Washington has leverage in influencing Korean diplomacy. However, China is South Korea's largest trading partner, and the volume of China-South Korea trade is greater than that of trade between the U.S. and South Korea and between Japan and South Korea combined. Additionally, China is key in deciding issues regarding the Korean Peninsula. It should be noted that, in the past few years, South Korea has generally made efforts to balance Chinese-U.S. relations. Its national influence is weaker than that of Japan, but its diplomatic wisdom is far greater than Japan’s.

As the Biden administration goes to extreme effort in pulling in allies to restrain China, President Moon's visit to the U.S. will be a new test of South Korea's diplomatic autonomy. The way the joint statement is written will be the touchstone of whether South Korea can stick to its fundamental principles under U.S. pressure.

The main subject of the U.S.-South Korea summit will definitely concern the Korean Peninsula, but President Biden is certain to be somewhat distracted, as he is now completely focused on China. As South Korea is a nation directly affected by issues on the peninsula, it receives American protection, but it has no way to determine how the U.S. implements this defense. Nowadays, the conflict between the U.S. and North Korea is particularly prominent, and Seoul often has to worry about how to promote peace between the U.S. and North Korea.

The crux of the issue is that the U.S. decided its Korean Peninsula policy based on its own national interests early on, and its consideration of Korean interests has gradually become marginalized. The Biden administration will prioritize the "China factor" in dealing with the Korean Peninsula, which may cause its peninsula policy to deviate from traditional consideration of denuclearization and long-term regional security, while shifting focus to the game between the great national powers.

In short, if it proves difficult to quickly denuclearize the peninsula, the Biden administration will find it more profitable to "Japanify" South Korea on the issue of China. This will focus on both soft power and hard work, and will fashion a strategic trap for South Korea.

South Korea has developed rather quickly in recent years, and this is obviously related to its relatively stable handling of relations with the two major powers of China and the U.S. It has neither over-echoed the U.S. strategy of pressuring China because of its competition with the country as it rises nor has it fully chosen sides in reaching for a phantom goal like the Taiwanese Democratic Progressive Party. The security situation that South Korea faces has always been quite complicated, and it will not be easy to achieve such a relative balance with China and the U.S. South Korea has endured much pressure, but it has also achieved many beneficial things.

In the future, South Korea will probably need to move forward steadily in the complex environment that is the game played by Northeast Asian powers, and refrain from taking extreme measures and sacrificing long-term benefits for short-term gain. Looking at the Indo-Pacific region as a whole, the U.S. has invested most in Northeast Asia. It regards this area as the most important strategic fulcrum for safeguarding its hegemony, as it hopes to mobilize the resources of the entire region to serve its interests. South Korea’s interest lies in interacting creatively with the U.S. superpower, maximizing its influence in shaping the relationship between South Korea and the U.S., and not letting itself be utterly used.




正在美国访问的韩国总统文在寅定于北京时间星期六凌晨与拜登总统会晤,之后将发表韩美领导人联合声明。美国之音等大肆炒作联合声明中将提及台湾问题的可能性,并称美国官员表示提及该问题的措辞强度将不亚于美日联合声明。

可以想见美国拉韩国加入“反华统一战线”的急迫努力,但我们也相信文在寅执政团队会对美方的胁迫进行抵制。因为在台湾这样的中国核心利益问题上跟随美国摇旗呐喊实在不符合韩国的国家利益,那相当于首尔受华盛顿的威逼喝下一杯毒药。我们也注意到,美方官员的实际表态含混不清,这反映了他们“做文在寅工作”的难度。

谁都知道今天的韩国在安全上首先倚重美国,华盛顿因此拥有影响韩国外交的杠杆。但中国是韩国的第一大贸易伙伴,韩中贸易量比韩美和韩日贸易量加起来还要多。而且中国是解决半岛问题的关键一方。过去几年应当说韩国总体上为在中美之间进行平衡做了努力,它的国力弱于日本,但它的外交平衡智慧则比日本突出得多。

这次文在寅访美发生在拜登政府极力拉拢盟友共同遏制中国的时候,对韩国外交的独立自主性形成新的考验。双方联合声明怎么写,将是韩国是否能在美国压力之下坚守原则底线的试金石。

美韩峰会的首要议题肯定是半岛问题,但拜登多少会有点心不在焉,因为这位美国总统如今满脑子都是“中国”。韩国作为半岛问题的当事国,虽然受到美国保护,但无法决定美方如何实施这种保护。如今美朝矛盾尤为突出,首尔经常要为如何促和美朝发愁。

问题的症结在于,美国早已按照本国的利益制定其半岛政策,对韩国利益的考量逐渐边缘化了。拜登政府处理半岛问题时会比特朗普政府更多考虑“中国”因素,从而可能让它的半岛政策偏离无核化以及地区长久安全这些传统考量,更多呼应其大国博弈的需求。

总之,当半岛无核化这个目标很难快速实现的时候,拜登政府会觉得把韩国在对华问题上“日本化”更加有利可图,它将致力于软硬兼施,为韩国量身定做一个战略陷阱。

韩国近年发展比较快,这与它相对稳健地处理了与中美两大国的关系显然有一定关系。它既没有像日本那样因为与中国崛起较劲而过度呼应美国的挤压中国战略,也不像台湾民进党当局那样为了一个虚幻目标而彻底选边站,韩国面对的安全形势本来是最复杂的,能够做到与中美的这种相对平衡应当说不容易,它承受了更多压力,但也赢得了更多利益。

韩国今后恐怕也需在东北亚大国博弈的复杂环境中稳健前行,不做任何极端的事情,不因图某个短期好处而牺牲长远利益。纵观整个“印太地区”,美国在东北亚投入的力量最大,它将这里当成了维护自己霸权最重要的战略支点,希望调动整个地区的资源为其利益服务。韩国的利益则在于创造性地与美国这个超级大国互动,并尽可能扩大对如何塑造韩美关系的话语权,而不是彻底为美国所用。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Poland: Ukraine Is Still Far from Peace. What Was Actually Decided at the White House?

Australia: Australia Boosts Corporate Law Enforcement as America Goes Soft

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Turkey: Pay Up or Step Aside: Tariffs in America’s ‘Protection Money’ Diplomacy

Canada: Carney Takes Us Backward with Americans on Trade

Topics

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Ireland: We Must Stand Up to Trump on Climate. The Alternative Is Too Bleak To Contemplate

Canada: Carney Takes Us Backward with Americans on Trade

Related Articles

Thailand: Appeasing China Won’t Help Counter Trump

Canada: Putin Is Negotiating Victory, Not Peace

Trinidad and Tobago: US, Venezuela and the Caribbean: Diplomacy First

India: Will New US Envoy Help to Repair Ties under Threat?

France: Global South: Trump Is Playing into China’s Hands