The Invasion of Ukraine: Make Russia Pay for Its Violence

Published in Yomiuri Shimbun
(Japan) on 25 February 2022
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Owen Hester. Edited by Laurence Bouvard.
A Serious Challenge to the UN Charter

Russia has launched a military attack on Ukraine. This is an invasion that clearly tramples on the sovereignty and territory of another country. It is an outrageous act in violation of international law.

It overturns the principles of respect for sovereignty, territorial integrity, and peaceful settlement of disputes enshrined in the United Nations Charter and destroys the international order that has existed since World War II. The international community must impose firm sanctions on Russia and make it pay a heavy price.

Mr. Putin's Selfishness

Russian President Vladimir Putin has ordered the Russian armed forces to launch a military operation under the guise of protecting the pro-Russian population in eastern Ukraine. He also stressed his intention to pursue the demilitarization of Ukraine.

The Russian Defense Ministry said it plans to carry out attacks to neutralize Ukrainian military facilities and airfields.

Missiles were reportedly used to attack government military facilities in Kiev, the capital of Ukraine, and major cities in the east, as well as Odessa in the south facing the Black Sea. Cyber attacks on government institutions have also been confirmed.

In light of the fact that the Russian military has been gathering and reinforcing its forces around Ukraine since the end of last year, it is likely that Putin had already made up his mind to invade.

Russia has been seeking assurances from the United States that it will not allow Ukraine to join the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the U.S.-European alliance. However, from the beginning, Russia had no intention of concluding negotiations and probably just wanted to create an excuse to justify the invasion.

In 2014, Russia annexed Ukraine's Crimean Peninsula using military pressure. This was triggered by the fact that Ukraine, a former Soviet Union constituent state, had turned pro-Western.

Putin has been emphasizing the historical and cultural unity of Russia and Ukraine. However, Ukraine has been moving further and further away from Russia in reaction to the annexation of Crimea, and a pro-Western oriented government was formed in 2007.

There is no doubt that Putin's real intention is to put a stop to these developments and bring Ukraine under Russia's sway by force.

The true purpose of the military operation will also be to weaken the Ukrainian military while expanding the scope of Russian military activities and force the current government to step down. The protection of the eastern population is just a pretext; there is no justification for the military action.

If the invasion continues, a clash with the Ukrainian military is inevitable. There will be many casualties on both sides, including the residents of Ukraine. Once again, we are outraged by Putin's inhumane decision.

The U.N. Charter stipulates the territorial integrity and political independence of nations and prohibits the use of force or military threats over territorial disputes. Russia has violated the U.N. Charter even though it is a permanent member of the U.N. Security Council, which has a greater responsibility for world peace and security.

The Existence of the Security Council is Questioned

Since the inauguration of the United Nations, the permanent members of the Security Council (the United States, Britain, France, China, and Russia) have been given veto power, which allows them to bury a draft resolution if even one country opposes it. The Security Council has become dysfunctional, with Russia attempting to avoid a resolution of condemnation on this basis.

Putin's unilateral condemnation of NATO's expansion after the collapse of the Soviet Union and his attempt to reorganize the global security order in a way that is convenient for Russia is a denial of the achievements of the postwar U.N. system.

In the first place, the choice or change of alliance is a matter for each country to exercise its sovereignty and decide of its own free will. NATO's enlargement was achieved as a result of new members from Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union which sympathized with democracy and the rule of law and wanted to strengthen their own security.

Russia's outrage is nothing less than a challenge to the postwar order. Japan, which has held up "U.N.-centeredness" as one of the basic axes of its diplomacy, should take the lead in advocating this at the UN General Assembly and elsewhere.

 Effective Sanctions

U.S. President Joe Biden said, "The world will hold Russia accountable," and stressed, "the United States and its Allies and partners will respond in a united and decisive way.”
[https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/02/23/statement-by-president-biden-on-russias-unprovoked-and-unjustified-attack-on-ukraine/]

At the time of Crimea's annexation, Japan, the United States, and Europe were unable to impose effective sanctions against Russia. Based on the lessons learned, it is important that the Group of Seven countries work together this time to come up with effective sanctions.

The U.S. is considering tightening financial sanctions to bar Russian banks and other institutions from dollar settlements and restricting the export of advanced technology to Russia. Germany has decided to suspend the operation of a new pipeline with Russia. Japan must also take a firm stance.

The support of Japan, the U.S., and Europe will be essential to ensure that Ukraine does not succumb to Russia's threats. Without the removal of Russian troops, negotiations with Russia cannot be expected. Pressure for their removal should be drastically intensified.


国連憲章踏みにじる重大な挑戦◆

 ロシアがウクライナに対する軍事攻撃を開始した。他国の主権と領土を踏みにじる明らかな侵略である。国際法に違反する暴挙だ。

 国連憲章でうたわれた、主権と領土の尊重や紛争の平和的解決の原則を根底から覆し、第2次世界大戦後の国際秩序を破壊するものだ。国際社会はロシアに断固たる制裁を加え、重い代償を払わせねばならない。

 ◆プーチン氏の身勝手

 プーチン露大統領は、ウクライナ東部の親露派住民を保護すると称し、ロシア軍に軍事作戦の開始を指示した。ウクライナの非武装化を追求する考えも強調した。

 露国防省は、ウクライナ軍の施設や飛行場を無力化するための攻撃を行う方針を示したという。

 ウクライナの首都キエフや東部の主要都市の政府軍施設をミサイルで攻撃し、黒海に面する南部オデッサも攻撃を受けたと伝えられる。政府機関に対するサイバー攻撃も確認されている。

 ロシア軍が昨年末以降、ウクライナ周辺に部隊を集結、増強させてきた経緯を踏まえれば、プーチン氏はすでに侵攻する決意を固めていたのだろう。

 ロシアは米国に対し、米欧同盟の北大西洋条約機構(NATO)にウクライナを加入させないことの確約を求めてきた。だが、交渉をまとめる意図など最初からなく、侵攻を正当化する口実を作りたかっただけではないか。

 ロシアは2014年にもウクライナのクリミア半島を軍事的圧力を使って併合している。旧ソ連構成国のウクライナが、親欧米に傾いたことがきっかけだった。

 プーチン氏は、ロシアとウクライナの歴史的、文化的な一体性を強調してきたが、ウクライナはクリミア併合に反発して、ロシアからますます離れている。19年には親欧米志向の政権が発足した。

 こうした動きに歯止めをかけ、ウクライナを力ずくでロシアの勢力下に置くことが、プーチン氏の本音であることは間違いない。

 軍事作戦の真の目的も、ロシア軍の活動範囲を拡大しながらウクライナ軍を弱体化させ、現政権を退陣に追い込むことだろう。東部住民の保護は口実にすぎず、軍事行動の正当性はどこにもない。

 侵略が続けば、ウクライナ軍との衝突は避けられない。住民を含め、双方に多数の死傷者が出ることになる。非人道的なプーチン氏の決定に改めて憤りを覚える。

 国連憲章は、国家の領土保全と政治的独立を定め、領土問題を巡る武力行使や軍事的な威嚇を禁じている。ロシアは、世界の平和と安全により重い責任を持つ国連安全保障理事会常任理事国であるにもかかわらず、これを破った。

 ◆安保理の存在問われる

 国連発足以来、米英仏中露の安保理常任理事国には、1か国でも反対すれば決議案を葬ることができる拒否権が与えられている。ロシアはこれを基に非難決議を回避しようとするなど、安保理が機能不全に陥っている。

 ソ連崩壊後のNATO拡大を一方的に非難し、世界の安全保障秩序をロシアに都合の良い形で改編しようとするプーチン氏の試みは、戦後の国連システムの成果を否定するものである。

 そもそも、同盟の選択や変更は各国が主権を行使し、自由意思で決める問題だ。NATO拡大は、東欧や旧ソ連の新規加盟国が民主主義や法の支配に共鳴し、自国の安全保障を強化しようとした結果、実現した経緯がある。

 ロシアの暴挙は、戦後秩序への挑戦にほかならない。「国連中心主義」を外交の基本軸の一つとして掲げてきた日本は、国連総会の場などで、こうした主張を先頭に立って展開すべきだ。

 ◆実効性のある制裁を

 バイデン米大統領は「世界はロシアの責任を追及していく」と述べ、「同盟国とともに断固とした措置をとる」と強調した。

 クリミア併合の際は、日米欧ともに効果的な対露制裁を科すことができなかった。この教訓を踏まえ、今回は先進7か国(G7)が足並みを 揃 えて実効性のある制裁を打ち出すことが重要である。

 米国は、ロシアの銀行などをドル決済から締め出す金融制裁の強化や、ロシアへの先端技術輸出の規制を検討している。ドイツは、ロシアとの新たなパイプラインの稼働停止を決めた。日本も 毅然 とした態度を示さねばならない。

 ウクライナがロシアの威嚇に屈することがないよう、日米欧の支援が不可欠となる。露軍の撤収なしでは、対露交渉は見込めない。撤収への圧力を強化すべきだ。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Topics

Afghanistan: State Capitalism in the US

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Related Articles

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Thailand: Appeasing China Won’t Help Counter Trump

Poland: Ukraine Is Still Far from Peace. What Was Actually Decided at the White House?

Luxembourg: Thanks, Daddy: Trump Is Imposing Putin’s Will on Europe