A Free Ride? Does Oliver-ssam Envy Korean Health Care?

Published in Yonhap News
(South Korea) on 30 December 2025
by Kim Jae-hyeon (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Ruthie Yarbrough. Edited by Michelle Bisson.
In South Korea, going to the hospital is faster than going to work. If a doctor says, “Let’s take a CT,” a CT scan is done immediately, and if a doctor says, “Let’s go into surgery now,” the patient is admitted promptly. No matter how expensive the diagnostic costs are said to be, they are nothing compared to those in the United States, which are high enough to cripple a household.

South Korea’s low-cost, high-efficiency system began in 1977, when Park Chung Hee’s administration implemented compulsory health insurance. During that time, the medical world resisted, saying it was a socialist idea for the government to control prices, and even bringing up Park’s past ties to the South Korean Workers’ Party. Despite the pushback, the government’s first action was to force workplaces with 500 employees or more to enroll in health care coverage. In return, to compensate hospitals for lowered medical fees, the government allowed the hospitals to set their own prices and profit from services that were not covered.

South Korea’s health care system, created through government coaxing and appeasement, evolved under the principle of “basic health care,” allowing any citizen to receive treatment. In 1989, the Roh Tae Woo administration expanded eligibility to the entire nation, even the self-employed. Then, in 2000, Kim Dae Jung eliminated inequity among patients by consolidating hundreds of medical insurance unions into the National Health Insurance Service. As a result, South Korea became a nation where patients could seek medical care with fewer concerns about costs.

The U.S. health care system, which Korean doctors call ideal, is the complete opposite of South Korea’s system. Insurance companies reign supreme over patients. Even when the doctor calls for an MRI, the insurance company insists on pre-approval. If the insurance company says to wait, everything comes to a halt. While the insurance provider crunches the numbers, the patient’s illness worsens and the “golden hour” slips away, frequently resulting in the patient’s death.

Oliver Grant, 37, a former native English teacher and YouTuber whose site is known as “Oliver-ssam,” became a hit after exposing the harsh reality of the U.S. health care system. Oliver-ssam said that, despite paying a monthly insurance premium close to 4 million won, or $3,000, his father was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer only after the cancer had become terminal. His heart-wrenching story prompts reflection. Without the implementation of Park’s “basic health care,” Roh’s nationwide medical insurance, and Kim’s medical consolidation, the current landscape of South Korea’s hospitals would not be that different from that of the United States.

Even so, it is doubtful that Oliver-ssam would envy Korea wholeheartedly. This is because doctors have recently been avoiding essential medical work so that they can pursue their own well-being. However, you cannot assign blame only to money-grubbing doctors. Since most people can make a living without fear of starving, isn’t society as a whole just avoiding the more demanding paths, from public service to corporate jobs to convenience store part-time work? If this trend continues, there is no guarantee that society will not revert to how it was before 1977 when people died from appendicitis.

In response to government efforts to increase the number of doctors, an unprecedented, coordinated strike is unfolding, involving everyone from first-year medical students onward. As the public appeals to professional ethics and considers doctors money-driven, a zero-sum game emerges. Oliver-ssam’s remark that he is “giving up eight years of life in the United States”* because of lagging health care has caused misunderstanding,, with many asking whether he intends to free-ride on South Korea’s health care system. This raises the question of whether he truly knows what has transpired in this country over the last eight years.

*Editor's note: This quote, accurately translated, could not be independently verified.


한국에서 병원 가는 일은 회사 출근하는 것보다 빠르다. 의사가 "CT 찍자" 하면 바로 찍을 수 있고, "빨리 수술하자" 하면 곧바로 입원 수속이 가능하다. 검사비가 아무리 비싸다고 해도 미국처럼 살림을 거덜 낼 정도는 아니다.

이런 저비용, 고효율 체계는 1977년 박정희 정부가 도입한 강제 의료보험에서 시작됐다. 당시 의료계는 '국가가 가격을 통제하는 것은 사회주의적 발상'이라며 박정희의 과거 남로당 이력까지 들먹이며 반발했지만, 정부는 500인 이상 사업장을 시작으로 가입을 강제했다. 정부는 대신, 낮게 책정한 진료비(저수가)로 인한 병원의 손실을 보전해주기 위해 병원이 스스로 가격을 정해 수익을 낼 수 있는 '비급여' 항목을 허용했다.

이렇게 정권이 어르고 달래며 만들어진 한국의 의료 체계는 국민 누구나 치료받을 수 있는 '기본 의료'의 원칙 아래 진화를 거듭했다. 1989년 노태우 정부는 자영업자까지 포함해 가입 대상을 전 국민으로 넓혔고, 2000년 김대중 정부는 수백개의 의료보험 조합을 국민건강보험공단으로 통합해 환자 간 불평등을 없앴다. 그 덕분에 한국은 환자가 돈 걱정 덜 하고 병원 문턱을 넘을 수 있는 나라가 됐다.

한국 의사들이 '이상형'으로 꼽는 미국은 정반대다. 보험사가 환자 위에 군림한다. 의사가 "MRI 찍자"고 해도 보험사가 사전승인제를 내세워 "기다려라" 하면 모든 게 멈추는 곳이다. 보험사가 계산기를 두드리는 동안 환자의 병은 깊어지고 골든타임을 놓쳐 목숨을 잃는 일이 빈번하게 일어난다.

영어 원어민 교사 출신 유튜버 올리버쌤(37·본명 올리버 그랜트)이 미국 의료의 민낯을 고발해 화제다. 그는 한화로 매달 400만원에 가까운 보험료를 내고도 부친이 췌장암 말기에 이르러서야 진단을 받았다고 했다. 그의 딱한 사연을 접하다 보면 문득 한 줄기 생각이 스친다. 박정희의 '기본 의료' 도입부터 노태우의 전국민 의료보험, 김대중의 의보 통합이란 결단이 없었다면, 오늘날 한국의 병원 풍경도 미국과 별반 다르지 않았을 것이란 사실이다.

그렇다고 올리버쌤이 한국을 마냥 부러워할지 의문이다. 요즘 의사들이 웰빙을 좇아 필수의료를 기피하고 있어서다. 하지만, 이를 단순히 '돈 밝히는 의사' 탓으로만 돌릴 수 없다. 국민 모두 굶지 않고 먹고살 만하니 공직부터 기업, 편의점 아르바이트까지 사회 전반이 성가신 길을 피하고 있지 않은가. 이런 흐름이 이어진다면, 맹장염으로 목숨을 잃던 1977년 이전 상황으로 되돌아가지 말라는 보장도 없다.

의사 수를 늘린다고 의대 신입생부터 전 세계 유례 없는 동맹 파업에 들어가고, 국민은 또 그들을 돈의 노예 보듯 하며 직업윤리를 호소하는 제로섬 게임이 벌어지고 있다. 낙후된 의료 환경 때문에 "8년간의 미국 생활을 포기한다"는 올리버쌤의 발언이 "한국 의료에 무임승차하겠다는 거냐"는 오해를 사고 있는데, 지난 8년 사이에 이 땅에서 무슨 일이 벌어졌는지 제대로 알고 하는 말인지 궁금하다.

This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Taiwan: As US-China Discuss New World Order, What Deterrence Can a Hollowed-Out Taiwan Find?

Austria: Trump’s 28-Point Plan Is the Original Sin of Current Diplomacy on Ukraine

Spain: What’s Dying in Caracas

Kenya: US Onslaught on Venezuela Targets Its Large Oil Resources

Poland: Attack on Venezuela. Donald Trump Crosses the Rubicon

Topics

China: Military Strike on Venezuela: US Hegemonic Actions Spark Global Wave of Protests

Mexico: Never with the Aggressors, Always with the Bolivarian Revolution

India: ‘Make America Great Again’ Not Just Election Slogan — It’s Trump’s Firm Resolve

Germany: Trump’s Audacious Show of Strength*

Spain: What’s Dying in Caracas

Austria: Trump’s 28-Point Plan Is the Original Sin of Current Diplomacy on Ukraine

Poland: Attack on Venezuela. Donald Trump Crosses the Rubicon

Related Articles

Austria: The Agreement on the US Budget Is a Defeat for the Democrats

Germany: The Democrats’ Missed Chance

Japan: US Shooting: We Must Also Turn an Eye Toward Inequality

Mexico: A Folklore Hero

Switzerland: Heroization of New York Murderer: Victim-Perpetrator Role Reversal Charts a Fatal Course*