Standing Before Hillary

Published in O Globo
(Brazil) on 3 March 2010
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Haitham Jendoubi. Edited by Laura Berlinsky-Schine.
Today was Brazil’s turn to receive Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who has been on a tour of Latin America since Monday. This is no ordinary visit. For the past decade, Brazil, one of the world’s emerging economies alongside China and India, has seen its power grow, strengthening its position in discussions with the United States on international matters.

One of Brazil’s legitimate goals is to secure a permanent seat in the United Nations Security Council, which still reflects the state of the world at the end of World War II. But the fact that Brazil often bases its foreign policy on that goal often leads to inopportune outcomes — for example, its abstention on the Security Council on votes to condemn the notoriously genocidal government of Sudan. Brazil wanted to make sure not to lose Arab votes in any future Security Council reform, but it’s not worth the price.

At the moment, Brazil is at odds with the United States on a critical subject: Iran’s nuclear program. The Obama administration, faced with Iran’s rapid progress in the field of nuclear technology, is appealing for a new round of sanctions with the support of allies and of Russia. In an obsessive bid for international approval, President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva’s administration (which set out on a determined course of rapprochement with Tehran), has even begun defending China’s position against sanctions and in favor of continuing negotiations — heedless of how much the Iranians defy the West by ramping up their uranium enrichment, bringing them closer to creating a nuclear bomb. President Lula has said that engaging the Iranian regime in dialogue is more effective than adopting sanctions, which would drive it into a corner. His government also questions the legitimacy of nuclear powers, such as the United States, Great Britain, France and Russia, calling for nuclear disarmament by other nations. But the Iranian regime, especially after the fraudulent reelection of President Ahmadinejad, is looking more and more like a military, theocratic dictatorship. It is not trustworthy in the least. The Obama administration is already hard at work revising U.S. nuclear policy in order to reduce its arsenal by thousands of warheads. According to the New York Times, the administration is considering a system that will deter attacks without resorting to nuclear weapons. Lula's already ridiculous argument is falling apart.

Hillary will use her visit to ask Brazil to support sanctions against Iran. Lula’s administration should break free of its ideological chains, which come from ignorant anti-Americanism. It should have some sense and help to contain Ahmadinejad’s ravings; such a position would enhance Brazil’s respectability.


No giro da secretária de Estado Hillary Clinton pela América Latina, iniciado segunda-feira, hoje é a vez do Brasil. Não é uma visita como qualquer outra. Na última década, cresceu a projeção do país, que integra o grupo dos emergentes ao lado de China e Índia, e isto reforça a posição do Brasil em discussões sobre temas da agenda internacional com os EUA.

Um dos objetivos legítimos da diplomacia brasileira é obter um assento permanente no Conselho de Segurança da ONU, que ainda reflete uma realidade do fim da Segunda Guerra Mundial. Mas o fato de Brasília muitas vezes subordinar sua política externa àquele objetivo produz situações descabidas, como, por exemplo, a abstenção no Conselho de Segurança em votações para condenar o governo do Sudão, notoriamente genocida. A preocupação é não perder votos de países árabes numa futura reforma do Conselho. Não vale o preço.

No momento, o Brasil diverge dos EUA num assunto crucial: o programa nuclear do Irã. O governo Obama, com o apoio de aliados e da Rússia, defende uma nova rodada de sanções diante da rápida evolução iraniana no domínio da tecnologia nuclear. O governo Lula, que iniciou uma firme aproximação com Teerã, numa busca obsessiva por afirmação internacional, passou a defender a posição da China, contra sanções e a favor de se continuar negociando, por mais que os iranianos desafiem o Ocidente com maior teor de enriquecimento de urânio, o que os deixa mais perto da arma nuclear.O presidente Lula tem dito que é mais proveitoso conversar com o regime iraniano do que adotar sanções, que o colocariam contra a parede. E setores de seu governo questionam a legitimidade de detentores de armas atômicas - como EUA, Grã-Bretanha, França e Rússia - defenderem o desarme nuclear de outras nações. Mas o regime iraniano, principalmente depois da reeleição fraudada do presidente Ahmadinejad, aproxima-se de uma ditadura militar teocrática. Não é minimamente confiável. Já o governo Obama está empenhado na revisão da política nuclear americana, de modo a reduzir o arsenal em milhares de ogivas. Segundo o "New York Times", está em estudo um sistema para dissuadir ataques sem recorrer a armas nucleares. Risível por si só, cai por terra o argumento lulista.

Hillary vai aproveitar a visita para pedir ao Brasil que apoie as sanções ao Irã. O governo Lula deve se livrar das amarras ideológicas derivadas de um antiamericanismo atávico, ter bom senso e ajudar a conter desvarios de Ahmadinejad. Tal postura aumentará a respeitabilidade do país.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Turkey: Blood and Fury: Killing of Charlie Kirk, Escalating US Political Violence

Poland: Marek Kutarba: Donald Trump Makes Promises to Karol Nawrocki. But Did He Run Them by Putin?

Canada: No, the Fed Was Not ‘Independent’ before Trump

Israel: Antisemitism and Anti-Israel Bias: Congress Opens Investigation into Wikipedia

Germany: When Push Comes to Shove, Europe Stands Alone*

Topics

Turkey: Blood and Fury: Killing of Charlie Kirk, Escalating US Political Violence

Thailand: Brazil and the US: Same Crime, Different Fate

Singapore: The Assassination of Charlie Kirk Leaves America at a Turning Point

Germany: When Push Comes to Shove, Europe Stands Alone*

Guatemala: Fanaticism and Intolerance

Venezuela: China: Authoritarianism Unites, Democracy Divides

Israel: Antisemitism and Anti-Israel Bias: Congress Opens Investigation into Wikipedia

Spain: Trump, Xi and the Art of Immortality

Related Articles

Thailand: Brazil and the US: Same Crime, Different Fate

Sri Lanka: Trump Is Very Hard on India and Brazil, but For Very Different Reasons

Colombia: US Warships Near Venezuela: Is Latin America’s Left Facing a Reckoning?

Germany: Learn from Lula