Arrival of U.S. Aircraft Carrier Will Escalate Sino-American Tensions

Published in Wenhui Daily
(China) on 16 July 2010
by He Liangliang (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Yalin Yuan. Edited by Benjamin Beeghly.
It is not known whether the U.S. was involved in the Cheonan incident.* Maybe it will never be known, but either way, the U.S. has delayed the return of South Korea’s military command. Whether Japanese Prime Minister Hatoyama’s resignation was forced after disagreements with the U.S. is also unknown. It’s impossible that the U.S. would launch a war against China because of the Cheonan, but the prospect of U.S. aircraft carriers in the Yellow Sea will certainly worsen Sino-American relations. As a superpower, the U.S. is used to showing force. However, this is neither a clever nor effective way to treat its major trade partner and biggest creditor, China.

Picture a monster, the U.S. Navy’s nuclear-powered aircraft carrier U.S.S. George Washington, appearing in China’s gateway, the Yellow Sea. One can imagine what a great threat it would be to China’s national security and the alarm it would cause the Chinese army and people.

When the carrier enters the Yellow Sea, and even if it remains close to South Korea, the Chinese military would certainly monitor it closely, a rare opportunity. The Chinese military — Army, Air Force, Navy — hasn’t experienced actual combat in many years. They have made great strides in the last decade, but remain untested by live combat. It is difficult to predict collisions or other emergencies. But since the ship is entering China’s gateway, it surely has prepared accordingly. The military must be ready and very aware of the U.S. aircraft carrier on its own doorstep.

Are the Chinese afraid of U.S. force? You will find the answer in the Korean War, 60 years ago. Poverty-stricken China, facing a war close to its own territory, decided to send troops to North Korea without hesitation. Despite the heavy price, it didn’t lose to the U.S., which was much stronger than China. Americans cannot forget the war.

What would Americans think if Chinese aircraft carriers appeared near Los Angeles or even New York? The problem is that Americans would never consider others’ feelings. There will be serious consequences if the U.S. ignores China’s.

Who would benefit from the Cheonan incident? Becoming the enemy of 1.3 billion Chinese people is different from imposing sanctions on Cuba, North Korea and Iran. The aircraft carriers appear in China’s gateway. Regardless of explanations from the U.S. and South Korea, it would inevitably arouse anti-American and anti-Korean sentiment. It is not China provoking the U.S. and South Korea; rather, it is the other way around.

Since South Korea and the U.S. insist that North Korea attacked the Cheonan, they should not toy with getting revenge on North Korea. The U.S. has already opened two wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and a war against Iran is always possible, lacking only Obama’s orders. The U.S.-South Korea military alliance has been operating for many years, and the attack plans for North Korea are updated annually. Since they insist that North Korea was responsible for the Cheonan, why don’t they attack now? Is the U.S. afraid of North Korea’s crude nuclear weapons? Of course not. So, what are they waiting for?

In 1898, the U.S.S. Maine exploded and sank in Havana harbor, off the coast of Cuba. The U.S. insisted that Spain was to blame, and launched the Spanish-American War, eventually winning control of the Philippines and other Spanish territories. Research performed by American scientists in 1975 showed that the Maine exploded because of an overheated boiler, but who still cares?

In August 1965 the U.S. accused North Vietnam of attacking U.S. warships in the Gulf of Tonkin with PT boats. With this excuse, the U.S. escalated the Vietnam War and began bombing North Vietnam ground targets.

When the U.S.S. George Washington appears in the Yellow Sea, it is assumed that Chinese early warning aircraft will pass over the ship, a variety of warships will appear nearby, and submarines will monitor the carrier from below. This is a confrontation between China and the U.S. military. To the Chinese forces, this confrontation is close to real combat exercises. It is unlikely that this would intensify to full-scale war, but the confrontation does show the tension of the G2 between a superpower and a rising power. The confrontation is not only about hard power; it is also a contest at the strategic level. The contest is only one aspect of Sino-U.S. relations. Even if the George Washington doesn’t enter the Yellow Sea, strain would appear in other forms in the future. If events like the Yinhe incident** and the bombing of the Chinese embassy*** happen again, the consequences would not be the same as in the 1990s. China will no longer swallow such insults.

Editor’s notes:
* On March 26, 2010, an explosion sank the ROKS Cheonan. North Korea was implicated by the South Korean government and others.
** In July of 1993, the U.S. government alleged that a Chinese container ship, the Yinhe, was delivering chemical weapons to Iran. A complete inspection revealed no weapons.
*** On May 7, 1999, during the Kosovo War, five U.S. bombs hit the Chinese embassy in Belgrade, killing three Chinese citizens.


冷眼向洋:如果美國航母出現在黃海
http://paper.wenweipo.com [2010-07-16] 我要評論(12)

何亮亮 鳳凰衛視評論員

 「天安」號事件是否美國製造,不得而知,可能將成為懸案。不過美國已經因此推遲了交還韓國的軍事指揮權;日本的鳩山首相辭職,是否因疏遠美國而導致,也不得而知。美國也不可能以「天安」號事件發動對中國的戰爭,然而美國航母出現在黃海,卻肯定會惡化中美關係。美國習慣於作為超級大國,動輒炫耀武力,但是用這種方式對待其主要貿易夥伴和最大債權國,卻肯定是不聰明而且無效的,而且只能激發中國的鬥志。

 設想一個龐然大物,亦即美國海軍的「喬治.華盛頓號」核動力航空母艦戰鬥群,出現在中國的門戶黃海,其對中國國家安全的威脅、對中國軍隊和民眾的震撼,都是可以預計的。

航母出現黃海是挑釁中國

 華盛頓號一旦進入黃海水域,即使是靠近韓國一側,中國軍方肯定全方位予以監測,這也是送上門的難得機會。中國軍隊,無論是陸軍還是空軍、海軍都已多年沒有實戰,近十幾年來中國的軍力在品質方面大有進展,不過還沒有經過實戰的考驗。至於會不會因此發生碰撞或者其他突發事件,誰也不敢預言,不過美國的航空母艦既然進入中國門戶,想必會做好相應的準備,而中國軍方必然嚴陣以待,不可能對家門口的美國航空母艦視而不見。

 中國人怕美國的武力嗎?看看60年前的朝鮮戰爭就知道了。一窮二白的新中國,在戰火燒近家門的時候,毅然出兵朝鮮,與實力遠強於自己的美國打了個平手,雖然也付出了極為沉重的代價。美國人應該沒有忘記這場戰爭。

 如果中國的航空母艦出現在洛杉磯附近甚至紐約附近的公海,美國人會做何感想?問題是美國人從來不會考慮別人的感受。但是這一次,不考慮中國的感受,會產生嚴重的後果。

誰從「天安」號事件得益

 與13億中國人為敵,是與制裁古巴、朝鮮、伊朗完全不同的事情。航母出現在中國的門戶,不管美國和韓國如何解釋,必然引起中國人的反美與反韓情緒。不是中國在挑釁美國和韓國,而是相反。

 韓國和美國一口咬定朝鮮襲擊了「天安」號,那就不要演戲,就報復朝鮮。美國已經在伊拉克、阿富汗開闢了兩個戰場,對伊朗的戰爭也早已部署完畢,只待奧巴馬一聲令下;美韓軍事同盟已經經營多年,攻打朝鮮的計劃也在每年更新。如今咬定是朝鮮製造了「天安」號事件,那為什麼不打朝鮮呢?美國難道害怕朝鮮簡陋的核武器嗎?當然不。那還等什麼呢?

 1898年美國軍艦「緬因」號在古巴的哈瓦那港爆炸沉沒,美國一口咬定是西班牙所為,以此為藉口發動了美西戰爭,一舉從西班牙奪走了菲律賓;1975年美國科學家的研究表明,「緬因」號是鍋爐過熱引發爆炸,但誰還關心呢?

 1964年8月美國指控北越魚雷快艇在東京灣(北部灣)襲擊美國軍艦,以此為由全面升級越戰,開始對北越的地面目標狂轟濫炸。

 「天安」號事件是否美國製造,不得而知,可能將成為懸案。不過美國已經因此推遲了交還韓國的軍事指揮權;日本的鳩山首相辭職,是否因疏遠美國而導致,也不得而知。美國也不可能以「天安」號事件發動對中國的戰爭,然而美國航母出現在黃海,卻肯定會惡化中美關係。

對峙超強激發中國鬥志

 當「喬治.華盛頓」號航母出現在黃海,中國的預警機掠過航母上空,各種海軍艦艇出現在航母周圍,中國潛艇在水下監視航母,都可以預見的。這將是中美軍隊之間的一次對峙,這種對峙對於中國軍隊,是一種接近實戰的演練,雙方不可能發生全面戰爭,但是這種對峙本身,卻顯示了G2的另一面,即一個超級大國與一個新興大國之間的對峙,對峙不僅是雙方硬實力的較量,也是雙方在戰略層面的較量,這種較量只是中美關係的一個方面,即使「喬治.華盛頓」號不開到黃海,這種較量今後也將以別的形式出現。可以預言,今後如果再發生類似「銀河」號事件或中國大使館被炸事件,其後果肯定與90年代的同類事件結果不同,中國不會再忍氣吞聲。

 美國習慣於作為超級大國,動輒炫耀武力,但是用這種方式對待其主要貿易夥伴和最大債權國,卻肯定是不聰明而且無效的,而且只能激發中國的鬥志。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Austria: If This Is Madness, There is a Method to It

Poland: Marek Kutarba: Donald Trump Makes Promises to Karol Nawrocki. But Did He Run Them by Putin?

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Germany: Donald Trump’s Failure

Germany: It’s Not Europe’s Fault

Topics

Austria: The US Courts Are the Last Bastion of Resistance

       

Poland: Marek Kutarba: Donald Trump Makes Promises to Karol Nawrocki. But Did He Run Them by Putin?

El Salvador: The Game of Chess between the US and Venezuela Continues

Austria: Donald Is Disappointed in Vladimir

Austria: If This Is Madness, There is a Method to It

Germany: It’s Not Europe’s Fault

Germany: Donald Trump’s Failure

Canada: No, the Fed Was Not ‘Independent’ before Trump

Related Articles

Germany: It’s Not Europe’s Fault

Spain: State Capitalism in the US

Thailand: Appeasing China Won’t Help Counter Trump

India: Will New US Envoy Help to Repair Ties under Threat?

France: Global South: Trump Is Playing into China’s Hands