Secrecy is the soul of business, and there is no business more secret than war. Or at least that was the case before the online organization WikiLeaks made 90,000 secret documents concerning the war in Afghanistan available to the public. The WikiLeaks website specializes in telling secrets; it is the Deep Throat* of the Internet age. WikiLeaks has already suggested to the government of Iceland that the Nordic island serve as a sanctuary for journalists and their confidential sources, with laws to protect the leak of information like the Cayman Islands protect tax evaders.
This week WikiLeaks and its founder, Australian journalist Julian Assange, provoked Washington. The ease with which WikiLeaks obtained and circulated information from a situation that requires secrecy proves that these organizations are here to stay — at least in democratic countries. (After all, soldiers are addicted to social networking websites and walk around armed with mobile phones that have recording devices.) Countries that ignore this can only continue to rely on their soldiers’ oath of loyalty and silence. Because leaks are unavoidable, democracies have no alternative but to teach their troops not to disappoint and their citizens not to assume that wars are invitations to tea. This last battle is almost impossible to win.
*Translator’s Note: Deep Throat was the secret informant in the Watergate case.
O segredo é a alma do negócio e não há negócio mais secreto que a guerra. Ou, melhor, era assim, já não é. Calculem os estragos que o site Wikileaks fez ao tornar públicos 90 mil documentos secretos da guerra do Afeganistão… O site especializou-se em contar segredos, é a Garganta Funda (o informador do caso Watergate) da era da Internet. Até já propôs ao Governo islandês converter a ilha nórdica num santuário para as fontes sigilosas e para os jornalistas, com leis que protegeriam as fugas de informação como as ilhas Caimão protegem as fugas ao fisco. Esta semana, o Wikileaks e a sua face mais visível, o jornalista australiano Julian Assange, fizeram uma formidável provocação a Washington. Em todo o caso, a facilidade de se obter e pôr a circular informações mesmo em cenários que exigem sigilo - os soldados andam armados com telemóveis que filmam e partem para a frente viciados nas redes sociais - garante que sites tipo Wikileaks vieram para ficar. Pelo menos em países com democracia. Países que prescindem desta podem continuar a confiar no juramento de fidelidade e silêncio dos seus soldados. Sendo as fugas de informação inevitáveis, cabe às democracias ensinar duas coisas: às suas tropas, que não metam o pé na argola, e à sua opinião pública, que as guerras não são convites para tomar chá. Esta última batalha é quase impossível de vencer.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
The madness lies in asserting something ... contrary to all evidence and intelligence. The method is doing it again and again, relentlessly, at full volume ... This is how Trump became president twice.
The madness lies in asserting something ... contrary to all evidence and intelligence. The method is doing it again and again, relentlessly, at full volume ... This is how Trump became president twice.
In an election that is shaping up to be a fierce contest, 1% or 2% of the vote in the most critical battleground states can make all the difference between winning and losing[.]