American Police Force Bills Crazy Pastor for Security?

Published in Zaobao
(Singapore) on 21 September 2010
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Stacy Wong. Edited by Gheanna Emelia.
A while ago, American Pastor Terry Jones initiated a plan to burn the Quran. This led to protests by Muslims worldwide, and greatly threatened the pastor’s personal safety.

In view of this, local police provided a high-level protection plan for the pastor.

On the eve of Sept. 11, Pastor Jones terminated his plan following the intervention of President Obama and associated people. Although the act of burning scriptures has occurred in many places in the United States, the place where Pastor Jones resides has already been calmed.

Jones will definitely not be sending a thank you card to the local police, nor will he be presenting a plaque, because from the public’s perspective, it is taken for granted that the American police force should protect Jones’ safety. After all, the American police force is supported by taxpayers!

Surprisingly, after the incident passed, Jones received an $180,000 bill from the local police.

According to the media, the Gainesville Police Department said that it spent more than $100,000 while the Alachua County Sheriff’s Office spent an estimated $80,000 to prevent any demonstrations from happening. However, Pastor Jones claimed that the church was not aware that they will be billed for security, and the police have been accused of overreacting.

Jones was undeniably stunned by the $180,000 bill. According to him, he had not specifically requested security from the police, and he did not receive any threats during the time he received protection.

So, should the American police force bill Pastor Jones for security?

This is indeed ridiculous at first sight. The American police force is supported by taxpayers and should provide security services for citizens, so how can policemen act like businessmen and claim costs for security? How is this any different from a firm? The American police force belongs to the public administration department, so how can it be corporatized?

But when we think about this issue more carefully, we realize that the American police force has its own reasons for doing so.

Since American policemen receive high wages and many benefits, the United States is stricter with its expenditure on the police force, resulting in the restricted number of policemen available. If the American police force does not charge for providing services to the public, it may not be able to support itself financially, and may resort to abusing its power.

This results in the phenomenon that the police servicing a rich area is stronger, making that area safer; while the police servicing a poorer area is weaker, making that area less safe. The fact that the American police force bills its citizens for security shows that any public service has its costs.


美国警察向疯狂牧师收保护费?

前段时间,美国牧师琼斯,发起焚烧穆斯林圣典《可兰经》计划,引发全世界穆斯林抗议的同时,其人身安全也面临很大威胁。

  为此,当地警方为牧师提供了高水准的安保计划。

  911前夕,琼斯牧师在总统奥巴马等人的干预下,终止焚经计划。尽管美国各地发生多起焚经行为,但琼斯本人所在地已经风平浪静。

  琼斯当然不会给当地警察寄感谢信,或者送块安民匾,以一般人的看法,美国警察保护琼斯安全,天经地义。毕竟,美国警察是靠纳税人养的嘛!

  让人想不到的是,焚经事件平息以后,琼斯本人竟然收到了当地警方寄来的18万美元的账单。

  据媒体报道:

  “盖恩斯维尔市警察局表示,为了防止抗议事情发生,他们花费了10万美元部署警力,当地阿拉楚阿镇的警察局也投入了8万美元。但牧师琼斯表示,其教会并不知道他们需要支付安保费用,警方已被指责反应过度。”

  对这18万元账单,琼斯本人肯定感觉错愕,对于琼斯本人来说,他并没有请警方安排特殊的保护,而且保护期间也没有遭遇到特别的意外威胁。

  那么,美国警察该向牧师琼斯收保护费吗?

  乍看一下,当然是岂有此理。美国警察由美国纳税人养活,向公民提供安保服务,怎么可能像个商人一样,收取安保成本呢?这跟一个普通的商业机构有何区别呢?美国警察属于公共管理部门,怎么能如此商业化呢?

  不过,仔细一想,美国警察这样做也有他们的苦衷。

  由于美国警察的工资待遇较高,美国对警察方面的财政开支审查又比较严,导致美国警察数量有限。如果美国警察不计成本为公民提供安保,一则财力上无法支持,二则会导致一些人产生滥用警力的做法。

  这就导致了一种现象,就是富人区的警方力量比较强,富人社区也比较安全;低收入社区的警力则比较弱,相应社区也比较危险。美国警察向公民收保护费的事实证明,任何公共服务都是需要成本的。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Spain: State Capitalism in the US

El Salvador: The Game of Chess between the US and Venezuela Continues

Austria: The US Courts Are the Last Bastion of Resistance

       

Austria: Donald Is Disappointed in Vladimir

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Topics

Sri Lanka: Qatar under Attack: Is US Still a Reliable Ally?

Taiwan: Trump’s Talk of Legality Is a Joke

Austria: The US Courts Are the Last Bastion of Resistance

       

Poland: Marek Kutarba: Donald Trump Makes Promises to Karol Nawrocki. But Did He Run Them by Putin?

El Salvador: The Game of Chess between the US and Venezuela Continues

Austria: Donald Is Disappointed in Vladimir

Austria: If This Is Madness, There is a Method to It

Germany: It’s Not Europe’s Fault

Related Articles

Singapore: Trump’s America Brings More Chaos, but Not Necessarily More Danger

Singapore: No Ukraine Cease-fire – Putin Has Called Trump’s Bluff

Singapore: Lessons from the Trump-Zelenskyy Meltdown – for Friends and Foes

Singapore: In Trump and Musk’s America, Echoes of China’s Past Emerge

Previous article
Next article