How Will Obama Tackle Sino-American Relations?

Published in Sina
(China) on 21 January 2009
by Cheng Yawen (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Ming Li. Edited by Louis Standish.
Obama’s inauguration on January 20th will start a new age of China-U.S. relations, which has witnessed rainbows and storms in the last 30 years. How will China and the U.S. get along with each other? This question is raising intense concern.

There is a rule of thumb to decide whether the relations between two countries are good or bad--the more common interests there are, the more pleasant the relations will be. Since the 1990s, China and America have had a relationship of conflict cum cooperation, which hasn't ended in a condition of pure competition. This relationship has been established both by inevitability and by chance. If the last 30 years can be used as a guide for the future, then one needs to be aware that there is no common strategic need on par with the past common need against the Soviet threat, regardless as if it is an economic or temporary anti-terrorism interest. Future China-U.S. relations will be uncertain if no new or solid common interest can be found.

However, a fresh and important bedrock for cooperation between China and America is coming from this century's aggravated world order. The decentralization trend of world politics, which came from economic growth in emerging countries and the renaissance of Europe, started in the second half of 20th century and is accelerating in this century. In the mean time, the damage to America’s national strength, which was caused by the U.S.’s rapid outward expansion, has shown a continuous fall of American hegemony in the 21st century. The U.S. is still currently the superpower with the most global influence and will be in the future, but the freedom of action beyond its home soil is impaired and restricted due to the abovementioned. These will force the U.S. retreat from some regions, just as Nixon's policies of strategic withdrawal did after the Vietnam War in the 1970s.

America’s thrust in other regions has caused friction and chaos, and its retreat might set off new problems. It is the friction and chaos people felt well during the last 8 years while Bush was president, and possibly, it will be the new problems people experience after Obama’s governance of America. America’s retreat from various regions will also increase world complexity and uncertainty and it will be the biggest security challenge ever faced by the world, not just by China and the U.S.

Political bodies like Europe, Japan and Russia have no capability to shape a new world order because they, as major political powers, are becoming more conservative and introversive due to their aggravated aging population, slow economic growth and domestic overburden, and do not have the national capability and will necessary for a country to dominate a new global order. In the foreseeable future, the U.S., which will have a relatively stable demographic, will have the leading economy in the world, and will have the strongest scientific and technological capabilities, will still have the urge to lead a new order, but will be focused locally, not globally.

To avoid the geopolitical turbulence and conflict caused by America’s withdrawal from some regions during its fall, China will have to bear an increasing security pressure in a certain period when the U.S. will lose in its national interests. So, the rooms for Chinese-American cooperation in supplying and creating public goods for the world will actually grow larger. Both the U.S. and China need help from each other. Cooperation with competition to a degree between China and the U.S. is key to help these two countries maintain good relations with other geopolitical powers and shape a stable system of world politics and economy.

Whether it is possible or not the growing common strategic interests shared by China and America will shape a closer cooperation between these two countries, is relying on a correct identification of the elements for cooperation by politicians in the two countries. It will be a misfortune for China and the U.S., even for the world, if these two countries, particularly the U.S., fail to grasp the chance to deal with the new and big security challenge they, also the world face now, but define utterly the role of the Sino-American relation as a “Challenge—Response” relation between an emerging country and a conservative one.

Cheng Yawen is a scholar based on Beijing


奥巴马会如何领悟中美关系

  作者:程亚文

  奥巴马已于20日上任,30年来彩虹与风雨并存的中美关系,也将面对新的开局。中美未来将如何相处,正引来人们的强烈关注。

  国家间关系是好是坏,其实有它的定则,那就是有无共同利益,共同利益越多,关系就可能越顺畅。中美在上世纪90年代以来既冲突又合作的关系形态,没有最后破局为纯粹的竞争关系,有必然性,也有偶然性。从过去30年看未来,要意识到的是,无论共同经济利益、还是暂时性的反对恐怖主义需要,都不足以与当年共同面对苏联威胁的战略需求相提并论。在此情况下,未来如果没有新的更为厚实的共同利益基础,中美关系仍将具有不确定性。

  中美新的重要合作基础恰恰正在出现,这就是新世纪以来世界无序化的加剧。20世纪下半叶以来因许多后发国家经济发展、欧洲复兴而带来的世界政治权势分散化趋势,在新世纪以来进程加速,与此同时美国无度对外扩张而给自身国力带来的损耗,已使21世纪初的世界,正面临美国霸权的持续衰落。美国在现在和未来较长时间内,虽然都还将是全球最有影响力的超级大国,然而,美国在其国土之外的行动自由,已因上述因素而遭到削弱和抑制。这将使美国再次选择从一些地方退却,就如上世纪70年代越南战争后尼克松实施战略收缩政策一样。

  美国向世界其他地方的强行推进会引来磨擦和混乱,美国从世界其他地方的退出也可能带来新问题。在最近八年布什担任总统期间,人们充分感受到的是前一点,而在奥巴马即将上台主政美国后,人们可能体验的将是后一点。美国从世界其他地区退出,也会给世界带来复杂和不确定性的增长。这将不仅是美国和中国,同时也是整个世界所面临的最大安全挑战。

  欧洲、日本、俄罗斯等政治实体还没有实力创造世界新秩序,这几个重要政治力量,都因人口老龄化程度加重、经济增长放缓、国家负担过重而日益保守内向。而主导全球性新秩序,所需要的乃是国家实力和志向。在可见的未来,美国因其相对合理的人口结构、世界第一的经济规模和最为强大的科技实力,仍会有这样的冲动,与此同时,美国同样也越来越多表露出美洲地方性而淡化其全球性。

  在美国相对衰落的过程中,中国要防止美国从其他地区退出引发的地缘政治动荡和冲突,将在一定时期内加重中国的安全压力,美国的国家利益也将受到损害。因此,在提供和创造全球生活公共品方面,中美未来的合作空间实际上将会加大。美国需要中国的帮助,中国的发展也离不开美国。中美之间有一定竞争的合作,是这两个国家与其他重要地缘政治力量保持良好关系、也是世界政治经济形成稳定秩序的关键。

  中美正在加强的共同战略利益能否转化为双方的紧密合作关系,有赖于两国政治家对相互之间合作基础的准确体认。尤其对美国来说,如果不能敏锐把握两国、同时也是世界所面对的新的巨大安全挑战,而将中美关系绝对化为所谓新兴者与守成者间的“挑战—应战”关系,这将不仅是中美两国乃至整个世界的不幸。

  □程亚文(北京 学者)
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Thailand: Donald Trump Buys Time with Weapons for Kyiv

Ireland: US Tariffs Take Shine Off Summer Economic Statement

Canada: Negotiating a Business Deal without Trust

Australia: What’s Behind Donald Trump’s Latest Crypto Adventure?

Topics

Russia: The Issue of Weapons Has Come to the Forefront*

Colombia: How Much Longer?

Germany: Tariffs? Terrific!

Spain: The New American Realism

Mexico: Trump vs. Cuba: More of the Same

Ireland: US Tariffs Take Shine Off Summer Economic Statement

Israel: Epstein Conspiracy: When the Monster Has a Life of Its Own and Rises Up

Related Articles

Germany: Trump’s Tariffs: China Acts, Europe Reacts

Australia: As Trump Turns His Back on Renewables, China Is Building the Future

Indonesia: US-China: Tariff, Tension, and Truce

China: US Chip Restrictions Backfiring

Thailand: US-China Trade Truce Didn’t Solve Rare Earths Riddle

Previous article
Next article