Edited by Harley Jackson
Obama’s policies of backing internal, subversive groups caused protesters to rely too much on his support. A protest was held before Aban 13th, a day on the Iranian calendar, in which the coordinating headquarters used the slogan “Obama, either with them or with us” as its primary theme. The protesters are asking for help from White House senior officials by calling upon the president of the United States of America, a country that has proven its 30-year-old hostility against the people and leaders of the Islamic Republic of Iran. This is after the supreme leader of Iran, in his meeting with students, admonished the dualistic policies of the U.S. president and said: “Whenever Americans have smiled, it has been revealed that they had a sword hidden behind them”. But the seditious Green movement has long demonstrated their distancing from the Iranian regime and revolted by committing a variety of acts. They have taken the lead in serving America compared to other anti-regime, dissident, and miscellaneous groups.
In contrast, Barack Obama, by adopting a dual policy in front of the Islamic Republic, hits the nail of renewing relations with Iran with the hammer of change in different instances, including his recent statement issued about the 30-year anniversary of seizing the American Embassy in Iran and the so-called espionage den in Tehran. He blatantly supported the rebellion. Following the presidential elections in Iran, U.S state-run spying and political apparatuses have been busy instigating the protesters and sending information to them in order to let America fully influence and control the Green movement in Iran.
Naturally, asking Obama to stay beside them, the Green puppets, in their hearts and minds, shout his name in the streets of Tehran, a predominant hub for fighting world arrogance, particularly the arrogance of America. Of course, the external collaborators, including Mirhossein Mousavi’s envoy abroad and Mohsen Makhmalbaf, clad in green, are busy conspiring to assemble in front of the U.S embassies in some European countries on the anniversary of the U.S. embassy’s capture in Tehran. By awarding apology to deputies of America, they officially prove they are dependent on the U.S. The question is why Mr. Mousavi claims such actions are of a self-generating movement of the people and blames everyone of reversing this fact.
The Green protesters call on Obama for aid, apologizing to U.S. embassies on behalf of millions. Isn’t this sufficient proof that U.S. leaders are provoking these acts?
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.