If There Were No Islam

Combat operations in Iraq were officially completed this week. In Washington, Israeli and Palestinian leaders met to resume peace negotiations. The two events indicate a reduction in instability in the Middle East but are far from representing the end of conflicts in the region, which became the scene of major international wars in recent decades, leading public opinion in the West to point to Islam as the source of violence.

Civil War in Lebanon, the Iran-Iraq War, First Intifada, the Gulf War, the Second Intifada, the Lebanon War (Israel vs. Hezbollah), the Gaza War, the war in Iraq and genocide in Darfur are examples of clashes that supposedly have Islam as a backdrop. Other conflicts involving Muslims in Central Asia also contribute to this phenomenon, namely the two wars in Afghanistan: the first against the Soviets, and the second, which has taken place over the past nine years, led by the United States against the Taliban and al-Qaida.

There were also wars with the participation of followers of Islam in Kashmir, China, Algeria and even in Kosovo and Bosnia. Muslims are also involved in internal issues and situations of violence in the United States, Britain and Spain, where terrorist attacks were committed in the name of Islam. Denmark and the Netherlands have seen free speech clashes with Muslim immigrants. And French secularism has clashed with the use of the hijab.

And the question that many analysts ask is whether the world would be more peaceful if there were no Islam. Obviously, we would still have the war on drugs in Colombia and Mexico, the Georgian war, the Tamil separatism in Sri Lanka and civil conflicts in Congo, Rwanda and Burundi. But what about all the other conflicts, from Algeria to Indonesia, from France to Iran?

To try to understand how the world would be if Mohammed had never existed, or if the prophet failed to spread the word of God — which, according to Islamic tradition, he received through the angel Gabriel — we turn to the former vice president of the National Intelligence Council of the U.S. Government, Graham Fuller, who wrote the book “A World Without Islam,” published this week in New York. It is a joint exercise with intelligence services like the CIA, where he also worked. In his view, our world would not be very different now, except of course for not having any Islamic cultural influence — but the basis of the book is geopolitics. The difference in the world without Islam, he said, is that the West’s enemy would be the Orthodox Christianity, not Islam — as it was, in certain ways, during the Cold War with the Soviet Union, which is mostly Orthodox.

Christians Among Islam

The Orthodox world, considered a civilization apart of the West by political scientist Samuel Huntington in his book “Clash of Civilizations,” has been around for centuries in Constantinople — now Istanbul — the former capital of the Byzantine Empire. Orthodox civilization always saw Catholicism as the enemy of Rome, and Protestantism has joined its ranks in recent years. At the same time, the Orthodox have always lived with Muslims within the empire, dealing with Islam from the beginning. With the fall of Constantinople, Orthodox Christians were living under Islamic rule, and the heart of Byzantine civilization moved to Moscow.

All these centuries, the Orthodox always saw the Western world with caveats and vice versa. Just watch the greater difficulty of the Orthodox countries of the old Iron Curtain, such as Serbia, Romania and Ukraine, in joining the European Union — the Protestants and Catholics haven’t had many difficulties. The Orthodox civilization for centuries has emerged as antagonistic to the West. If there were no Islam, they probably would be at the forefront of Middle East conflicts.

Palestinian Christians

In some ways, they are already. The first separatist movements began with Palestinian Christians, like George Habash, from the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine. Many Palestinian terrorists in the 1960s and 1970s were baptized in the Orthodox Church. The biggest supporter of the Palestinian cause in academia for many years was Edward Said (an Orthodox converted to Anglicanism). Until now, in the dome of Fatah, there is a range of Christian authorities — Yasser Arafat’s wife and daughter follow Christianity in Paris. Arab citizens of Israel with Christian origin, with rare exceptions, do not serve in the Israeli army. They identify themselves as Palestinians and live among Muslims in the cities of Nazareth and Jaffa.

The rivalry between Orthodox and Catholics can even be observed in the Church of the Holy Sepulcher in Jerusalem. There are no representatives of the Vatican in what is probably one of the two holiest places of Christianity, beside the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem. The church is controlled by Eastern Christians, which includes the Orthodox, Copts, Chaldeans, Assyrians and other denominations. The Franciscans, who represent the Vatican in Jerusalem, can only enter during the procession of the Via Dolorosa on Fridays. The main Christian religious authority of the city is Orthodox, always closer to the Palestinian leadership than the Israelis.

Lebanese Christians

The Orthodox also identify with the Muslims in Lebanon. In the Civil War (1975-90), they always sought to keep neutrality in the conflicts involving Maronite Christians, who respect the Pope’s authority, and with some factions allied with Israel, as well as Shiites, Sunnis and Druze. Even now, the post of Foreign Minister of Lebanon is reserved for an Orthodox; they have always better understood the balance of power in a multi-religious country and how to deal with both Islamic and Western countries.

Israel currently is in a state of war with only two countries: Lebanon and Syria. The Egyptians and the Jordanians have signed peace treaties. Saudi Arabia, Iraq and even Iran do not have relations, but also do not have territorial disputes and are not engaged in conflict against the Israelis. Ironically, the regime in Damascus and Beirut’s government is not ruled by Islam.

Syria

Bashar al Assad, although officially Alawite Muslim, does not fast in Ramadan; the same goes for several of his ministers. He is a secular leader. His wife, who studied in the U.S., does not cover her head. The use of the hijab, as in Turkey, is not allowed in schools and public buildings. Radical Islam is considered an internal enemy and was the target of a massacre in Hama when his father, Hafez al Assad, was still alive. The conflict with Israel would exist even if there were no Islam, as the religion does not weigh on the decisions of the regime. Not to mention that the two countries (Israel and Syria) dispute the Golan Heights, inhabited by Syrian Druze, which is practically a religion separate from Islam.

In Beirut, the power is divided between religions, with Christianity historically taking advantage. The president is always a Maronite Christian; the prime minister, Sunni; and the president of Parliament, Shiite. Half of the cabinet members are Christian. Most of the generals, including the army chief, need to be Christians. Even Hezbollah has Christian allies in operations against Israel.

Christians and Arab Nationalism

Iraq was ruled by a laic regime of Saddam Hussein. His government was still based on Arab nationalism and his second in command was a Christian, Tariq Aziz. It was similar to the regime of Gamal Abdel Nasser in Egypt and other Arab nationalists who dominated politics in the region until the 1980s. As with the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO), Arab nationalists did not speak of Islam. One of the fathers of Arab nationalism was the Orthodox Christian Antoine Saadeh, who founded the Syrian Social Party in Lebanon and, curiously, lived in Brazil. His club, even today, is dominated by Orthodox Christians in Beirut and takes a radical stance against Israel, besides committing acts of violence.

Russia Would Lead Conflict against Israel and the U.S.

If there were no Islam, probably these Christians would be the leaders for actions against Israel, with support from Russia. Iraq and Egypt might have been secular regimes administered by Christian defenders of Arab nationalism — just like the Orthodox in Beirut and Damascus in the 1920s, or those in Sao Paulo in 1922 fighting for the establishment of an Arab identity. The Iran-Iraq War, certainly the bloodiest conflict in the Middle East in the 20th century, had no religious character. They were Shiite Persians from Iran on one side against Sunni Arabs, Shiites and Christians on the other. The Kurdish conflict involves neither religion — they are mostly Muslims who fight against Turks, Arabs and Kurds.

In Afghanistan, Islamic radicals were supported by the United States in the fight against the Soviets. The Americans wanted the Soviet Union away from that region regardless of Islam. There was no opposition to the mujahedeen of the West. The animosity between Hindus and Muslims has intensified after the partition, with removal of 14 million people from India to Pakistan and vice versa. Probably, if there were no Islam, the conflict would involve Zoroastrians and Hindus. The genocide in Darfur, in Africa, perhaps would exist even without the existence of Islam — just look at Rwanda’s and Congo’s cases.

Integration in the Occident

In the U.S., Muslims have always been well integrated, despite the worsening in relations after Sept. 11 2001, and especially this year, when Time magazine questioned whether Americans are Islamophobic. But Italians, Irish, Greeks, Jews and of course, Lebanese and Syrians of Orthodox Christian origin lived with the same problem when they immigrated and now they are integrated. Japanese and Russians, seen as the enemies decades ago are no longer targets. Latin Americans, including Brazilians, have become the target of attacks in recent years from the American right wing.

Europe is less used to immigration than Brazil and Argentina, which for 10 years was ruled by a Muslim Arab, Carlos Menem. The wave of immigrants in countries like Italy is still young. However, as Fuller says, immigrants from other countries also face problems of assimilation, including Africans in France and South Americans in Spain and Portugal.

Christian Terrorism

The suicide terrorism and al-Qaida are recent phenomena and cannot be restricted to Islam. The first Sunni Muslim to blow himself up in human history was a Hamas member in the early 1990s in Israel. A decade earlier, Iranian and Lebanese Shiites were also at the forefront of this form of attack. Without forgetting that, until the outbreak of the Iraq War in 2003, the Tamil Tigers, who are not Muslims, led the ranking of suicide bombings. As Robert Pape, a professor at the University of Chicago who compiled all the suicide bombings in the world since 1980, recalls, in Lebanon the suicide attacks were not restricted to Muslims. Among 41 attacks in the country in the 1980s, 27 were committed by communists and socialists, three by independent Christians and only eight by radical Muslims.

Al-Qaida had never been mentioned in any Western media outlet 15 years ago. The word “Muslim” or “Islam” was not used once throughout the Estadao [Brazilian newspaper] coverage during the Six Day War (1967) — not even a month before or one month later. The West, according to Edward Said in his famous book “Orientalism,” built the image of the East the way they wanted. In Brazil you can see the same changes. In the 1960s and 1970s, the image of Muslim women was that of the odalisque. Today it is that of the burqa. A reveler can be mistaken as a member of al-Qaida in a U.S. airport if he gets excited with the march “Allah Allah my good” on his iPod. Indeed, Allah means God in Arabic, even for the Orthodox Christians.

There are more crimes against women in Islamic countries. But many of these crimes, like the stoning of women, “is not practiced only among Muslims, nor did it begin with Islam.” Stoning is an ancient tribal tradition in some regions of Africa and Asia, Robert Worth wrote in a recent article in the New York Times. The Islamic world is as diverse as seeing a Muslim girl in a bikini on the beach in Beirut and another one using a burqa in Riyadh.

About this publication


1 Comment

  1. Islam is the continuation of divine guidance emanating from Adam. Says Koran: God exalted Adam and Noha and the House of Abraham and the House of Imran (father of Virgin Mary) on the peoples of the world. Denying Islam means denying God. The Koran comprises the entire texts of Torah and the Gospels reinforcing them with prayers. Jews are offered rewards double compared to the Muslims and Christians would better understand from Christ’s commandment that ‘you will be born again.” Islam’s thrust is on the authenticity of Resurrection and accountability on the Day of Judgment. A mere acknowledgment of the hereafter starts divine guidance from the grassroots to the level of saints. The fear of Shar’ia is merely a bugbear. There is no Shar’ia in practice. The Saudi model has done more harm to the Saudis than good. Shar’ia, if it does come, would start from a clean slate by God’s compassion and forgiveness of all sins. The pagan Arabs were no less stiff necked and stubborn than were the Jews of the time of Moses. Islam showered grace and blessings on the respondents to the Koran in such torrents that the believers created a culture and civilisation that, according to India’s leader Jawaharlal Nehru, became “one of the wonders of history.” He even admitted that if the Arab push in the province of Sindh by a young Arab warrior Bin Qasam had continued, India might have become similar in its culture and civilisation as Egypt and Syria. The Ottomans were invited by the Balkan Christians. Did the Ottomans impose Shar’ia on them? Shar’ia’s thrust is on promotion of virtue to such an extent that the evil forces are reduced to the bare minimal. Islam’s blessings comprise an eye-popping stimulus of 700 times (70,000 percent) on spending of charity in the love of God. Try it. The giver of this bounty is God.

Leave a Reply