Obama Unlikely To Cross Swords With Putin over Ukraine

Published in Huanqiu
(China) on 8 March 2014
by Wang Xianju (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Nathan Hsu. Edited by Brent Landon.
The Ukrainian crisis is now unfolding at a rapid pace, and Russia has visibly tightened its control over the situation in Crimea. The U.S. government has announced measures enabling sanctions against Russian officials and warned of possible economic sanctions. The EU has also issued a statement that they are considering "a three-step process" to ramp up action against Russia. But few people truly believe that the U.S. and EU sanctions will achieve much. Putin himself is of the opinion that they will hold little more than symbolic value, much less break Russia's resolve.

Events in Ukraine intersect with Russia's core interests, and the indomitable Putin is not given to equivocating on such matters. Meanwhile, to the U.S., Ukraine is but a peripheral interest; one for which it would be unthinkable for Obama to cross swords with Putin. In the game of international relations, divergent outcomes are often determined by such strengths or weaknesses of will. Furthermore, Putin has some basis for justifying his actions in terms of international convention, while the U.S. and EU have yet to find solid footing. Within the unrest, the opposition faction that the West is backing has many weaknesses that can be exploited. This most recent Ukrainian crisis is no more than an attempt by the U.S. and EU to undermine Russia, but they have fallen far short of their goals.

Putin will lose little sleep over the threat of sanctions from the U.S. and EU. For quite some time now, the U.S. has been enacting discriminatory trade policies toward Russia and passed multiple bills restricting the development of economic ties between U.S. firms and Russia, with the result that annual trade between the two countries only totals $30 billion. The volume of trade between Russia and the EU is somewhat larger, amounting to roughly $400 billion per year. But the EU is divided on sanctions. Its 28 member states have fractured opinions on the issue, with some of them being unwilling to blindly follow the lead of the U.S., having experienced firsthand how Washington sows the seeds of misfortune and waits to reap the benefits. Maintaining normal trade relations with Russia remains of particular importance to Germany, France and other leading nations in the EU due to flagging efforts to revitalize the economy since the 2008 financial crisis. As an example, over 6,000 German companies operate within Russia — a figure corresponding to 300,000 jobs — and almost 40 percent of Germany's crude oil and natural gas is of Russian origin. Consequently, sanctions on Russia from the U.S.-led West are far from being realized. A March 6 summit was held precisely because of divided European positions on the issue.

As all well know, Russia is rich in natural resources and has access to every element on the periodic table. It is also one of the world's largest exporters of oil and natural gas. This independent, self-sufficient industrial economy would enable Russia to survive any amount of economic sanctions. Moreover, the Russian people possess a stalwart character and strong solidarity. Their mettle and courage shine at the critical junctures that determine the fate of their race, and they are not easily cowed by their enemies.

Even if Russia is confronted with Western sanctions and efforts to isolate it, its economic cooperation with the outside world will not simply cease. For one, the Russian-backed process of integrating the economies of the Commonwealth of Independent States has not been put on halt because of the Ukrainian crisis or Western sanctions. On March 6, the supreme council of the Eurasian Economic Commission, which was formed by Russia, Kazakhstan and Belarus, voted to move forward with plans to establish a Eurasian Economic Union. They also drafted an agreement regarding Armenia's inclusion into the union. Additionally, Russia has long-standing and extensive trade ties with fellow BRICS nations China, India, Brazil, and South Africa. Being snubbed by the West would undoubtedly lead Russia to further expand cooperation with those nations, as well as those of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, the wider Asia-Pacific region and even developing countries in Africa and Latin America, marking another key reason why Russia has little fear of U.S. and EU sanctions.

The author is vice director of the PRC State Council Development Research Center's Euro-Asian Social Development Research Institute.


 乌克兰危机正在快速演变,俄罗斯对克里米亚局势的控制明显加强。美国政府在扬言对俄罗斯一些官员实行签证制裁的同时,又威胁要对俄实行经济制裁。欧盟也称考虑“分三阶段制裁俄罗斯”。但对欧美发动的制裁,很少有人认为会起到多大作用,它被普遍认为只能起到“象征性”作用,更不用说能压垮俄罗斯。

  乌克兰涉及俄罗斯的核心利益,强势的普京更不会在核心利益上有任何含糊。而乌克兰对美国来说属于外围利益,奥巴马不可能为了“外围利益”和普京拼刺刀。在国际博弈中,意志力强弱往往造成不同的结果。从国际道义上,普京也有他的依据,美欧没有占到绝对的理。在乌克兰乱局中,西方所支持的反对派有各种各样的小辫子可以抓。这次乌克兰危机,实际是欧美想挖俄罗斯的墙角,结果偷鸡不成蚀把米。

  对美欧的制裁,普京不会放在心上。美国长期以来对俄罗斯实行贸易歧视政策,通过多项法案限制美国企业同俄发展经贸关系,至今美俄年贸易额仅300多亿美元。欧盟和俄罗斯的贸易额虽大,每年约4000亿美元。但欧盟对制裁俄罗斯三心二意,28个成员国不是铁板一块,一些国家对华盛顿嫁祸于人和渔翁得利的伎俩早有所领教,不愿盲目跟随。尤其是欧盟经济自2008年以来一直复苏乏力,保持与俄罗斯正常的经济贸易关系,对德国、法国等主要成员国有重要意义。例如,德国有6000余家企业在俄经营,有30万个工作岗位与此有关,有将近四成的原油及天然气来自俄。因此,以美国为首的西方国家对俄罗斯制裁根本是不现实的,而6日举行的欧盟峰会就是因为各国意见分歧,没能就对俄实行经济制裁达成一致立场。

  众所周知,俄罗斯资源丰富,拥有门捷列夫化学元素周期表上所有元素的矿产资源,也是世界上最大的石油和天然气出口国之一;独立、自给自足的工业经济体系使俄罗斯能够在外国经济制裁的情况下渡过难关,绝处逢生。更何况俄罗斯民族具有一种坚强的性格和凝聚力,在决定民族命运的关键时刻,这个民族具有一股大无畏的气概和勇气,不会被敌人压倒。

  此外,即便是遭遇西方孤立和制裁,俄罗斯的对外经济合作也不会因此停止。一方面,俄罗斯力推的独联体地区经济一体化进程并没有因为乌克兰危机、西方制裁而停止。6日,俄罗斯、哈萨克斯坦和白俄罗斯组成的欧亚经济委员会最高理事会仍然决定按既定计划建立欧亚经济联盟,并决定起草关于亚美尼亚加入欧亚经济联盟的条约;另一方面,俄罗斯一直与中国、印度、巴西、南非等金砖国家有广泛的经济和贸易联系。如果西方制裁俄罗斯,俄必将进一步扩大与金砖国家、上海合作组织、亚太地区乃至非洲和拉美等发展中国家的合作,这也是俄不惧怕美欧制裁的重要原因之一。▲(作者是国务院发展研究中心欧亚社会发展研究所副所长、研究员)
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Spain: How To Burst the MAGA Bubble*

Israel: Epstein Conspiracy: When the Monster Has a Life of Its Own and Rises Up

Spain: The New American Realism

Ireland: US Tariffs Take Shine Off Summer Economic Statement

Topics

Spain: How To Burst the MAGA Bubble*

Russia: The Issue of Weapons Has Come to the Forefront*

Colombia: How Much Longer?

Germany: Tariffs? Terrific!

Spain: The New American Realism

Mexico: Trump vs. Cuba: More of the Same

Ireland: US Tariffs Take Shine Off Summer Economic Statement

Related Articles

Germany: Trump’s Tariffs: China Acts, Europe Reacts

Australia: As Trump Turns His Back on Renewables, China Is Building the Future

Indonesia: US-China: Tariff, Tension, and Truce

China: US Chip Restrictions Backfiring

Thailand: US-China Trade Truce Didn’t Solve Rare Earths Riddle