Those Who Encourage ‘Decoupling’ Will Go Down in History as Sinners

Published in Guangming Daily
(China) on 23 August 2020
by Guo Yan (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Jo Sharp. Edited by Elizabeth Cosgriff.
The normalization of Chinese-American relations began in the 1970s. Today, China and the United States are deeply connected in many areas, including matters of economy, society and culture. These connections have brought huge mutual benefits to both countries: Trade between the U.S. and China has increased more than 200-fold since the establishment of diplomatic relations and bilateral investment has grown from almost nothing to nearly $240 billion. China’s high-quality but inexpensive goods have brought great benefits to U.S. consumers, and China’s vast market and favorable business environment have provided ample profits for American companies.

However, some U.S. politicians, for the sake of political self-interest and against the tide of history, frequently promote and encourage such fallacies as the “decoupling” of China and the United States in a vain attempt to cut off the flow of capital, technology, goods, industry and personnel. Their actions will harm the interests of people around the world, including the American people. As Joerg Wuttke, president of the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China, said: “If China and the United States continue to decouple, in the end, everyone will lose.”*

We must see that today’s China has enough confidence to deal with all kinds of “decoupling” petty tricks and suppression measures from some American politicians and that no power whatsoever can stop the rise and development of China. China is the world’s largest market and has the most comprehensive range of industries in the world. The country’s economy has withstood the severe test of a global pandemic and has shown ample resilience, motivation and potential.

It also allows the world to clearly see China’s global importance and that cooperation with China is bound to achieve mutual benefits and a win-win situation, and that “decoupling” is a very unwise choice. The BBC has reported that even with the global spread of the pandemic and difficulties in Chinese-American relations it is still hard to move completely away from reliance on Chinese supply chains. According to a recent survey, 87% of companies surveyed said that China is still one of their top three procurement locations. According to The Economist, the U.S. government’s executive orders against TikTok and WeChat as well as the so-called Clean Network program and other measures will hurt U.S. technology giants.

At the same time, many multinational companies, including U.S. ones, have expressed their views with each and every investment project in China.
The progress of globalization has created a trend, whereby, ties between countries have become increasingly close to the point that the rise of one is the rise of the other and losses felt by one are felt by all. As a beneficiary of and a contributor to globalization, China clearly sees that globalization is in its interests and in the common interests of the international community.

The same is true of Chinese-American relations. China’s attitude has always been very clear: Despite the current difficulties in bilateral relations, China and the United States still have many common interests and many needs for interaction. These are all important foundations for the stable development of Chinese-American relations. Resolutely maintaining and stabilizing Chinese-American relations and strengthening the ties between the two countries in all areas shows a respect for history and a responsibility to the future.

In 1972, then-President Richard Nixon undertook an ice-breaking trip to China, achieving a “handshake across the Pacific” and said in his speech at a welcome banquet at the Great Hall of the People, “I am here for the benefit of the American people.”

The historical developments of the past 50 years have not failed to meet the expectations and efforts of Chinese and American politicians and have repeatedly proved this fact: When China and the United States work together both benefit; when they fight, both are injured. Strengthening cooperation between China and the United States and insisting upon such cooperation and avoiding confrontation not only benefits the two countries, it also benefits the world.

*Editor’s note: This quote, accurately translated, could not be verified.


二谈维护和稳定中美关系
  上世纪70年代,中美关系正常化步伐开启。如今,中美两国在经济、社会、文化等诸多方面都已经深度联系在一起。这种联系为两国带来了庞大的共同利益:中美贸易额较建交之初增长了200多倍,双向投资从几乎为零增长到近2400亿美元。中国物美价廉的商品给美国消费者带来了极大实惠,中国广阔的市场和良好的营商环境为美国企业提供了丰厚利润。
  然而,一些美国政客为捞取政治私利,逆历史潮流而动,频频宣扬、煽动中美“脱钩”等谬论,妄图人为切断资金流、技术流、产品流、产业流、人员流。其所作所为将伤害包括美国人民在内的全世界人民的利益。正如中国欧盟商会主席伍德克所说:“若中美继续脱钩,最终所有人都将是输家”。
  我们必须看到,今天的中国有足够的底气应对一些美国政客的各种“脱钩”小动作和打压举措,没有任何一种势力能够阻挡中国的崛起与发展。中国是全球最大的市场,是世界上工业门类最齐全的国家。中国经济经受住了突发性全球疫情的严峻考验,展现出足够的韧性、动力和潜力。
  这也让世界清楚地看到中国之于世界的重要性,看到与中国合作必将实现互惠共赢,“脱钩”则是十分不明智的选择。英国广播公司在报道中认为,即使在疫情全球蔓延和中美关系面临困难的情况下,完全摆脱对中国供应链的依赖仍然很难。一项近期调查显示,87%的被调查企业表示,中国内地仍是他们3个首选采购目的地之一。经济学人杂志则称,美国政府针对TikTok和微信的行政命令以及所谓的“清洁网络”计划等措施,将使美国科技巨头成为受害者。与此同时,包括美国企业在内的众多跨国公司,用一个个在华投资项目表达了他们的态度。
  全球化发展造就了这样一个趋势:国与国之间的联系变得日益紧密,乃至达到了一荣俱荣、一损俱损的程度。作为全球化的受益者与贡献者,中国清楚地看到,全球化符合中国利益,也符合国际社会的共同利益。
  对于中美关系来说,亦是同理。中国的态度一贯十分明确:尽管目前双边关系陷入困境,中美之间仍有许多共同利益,仍有大量的交往需求,这些都是中美关系保持稳定发展的重要基础。坚定不移维护和稳定中美关系,加强两国在各方面的联系,是对历史的尊重,是对未来的负责。
  1972年,时任美国总统的尼克松对中国进行了“破冰之旅”,实现了“跨越太平洋的握手”,尼克松在人民大会堂欢迎宴会致词时表示,“我是为了美国人民的利益而来。”近50年的历史发展没有辜负中美两国政治家的期望和努力,也一再证明了这样一个事实:中美两国合则两利、斗则俱伤。中美两国加强合作,坚持合作,避免对抗,既造福两国,又利泽天下。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Japan: Expectations for New Pope To Mend Rifts among American People

OPD: 16 May 2025, edited by Helaine Schweitzer

Germany: Ukraine War: Cease-fire Still Out of Reach

Canada: Scorning Trump’s Golden Dome Would Be a Mistake

Russia: Will Trump Investigate Harris? Political Analyst Responds*

Topics

Germany: Trump for the Charlemagne Prize!

Canada: It Turns Out Trump’s Tariffs Were Illegal After All

Australia: Trump’s Tariffs Were Already Ever-Changing. Now, Court Fights Add to the Uncertainty

Austria: Soon Putin Will Have Successfully Alienated Trump

Canada: Scorning Trump’s Golden Dome Would Be a Mistake

Related Articles

Mexico: Trump and His Pyrrhic Victories

Canada: Trump Prioritizes Commerce over Shared Values in Foreign Policy Gamble

Hong Kong: The Lessons of World War II: The Real World Importance of Resisting Hegemony