Biden Is Congratulated upon Winning Presidency

Editor’s note: This article contains information that is not true and cannot be verified, as indicated.

A variety of American news sources and politicians announced the name of the winner of the U.S. presidential election. Joe Biden and his associates are actively being congratulated by foreign leaders and even members of the Republican Party, which Donald Trump belongs to. But isn’t it too early for them to write off the current U.S. president?

American liberals began a large-scale psychological attack on President Donald Trump, his supporters and the naive people who still believe in democracy and the law.

On Nov. 7, four days after the presidential election, many American media outlets published cheerful headlines about Joe Biden’s victory. “America Won. Voters stopped an authoritarian populist from destroying the country’s democratic institutions,” is the title of a main article on the website of The Atlantic. Some announcing Biden’s triumph — like commentator Van Jones on CNN, for example — even burst into tears of joy. So, naturally, the first lines of the song “Cry Me a River” by Justin Timberlake: “You were my sun, you were my earth” — immediately came to mind.

In fact, Biden is American leaders’ current sun, dispelling the gloom of Trump’s government. And when the sun didn’t come out from behind the cloud immediately after voting was over and counting started (simply because Trump won all of the contested states and was confidently heading toward victory*), then panic among Democrats ensued.

However, liberal elites had a Plan B.* Mass stuffing of suspicious postal ballots played a role. They sent falsified votes from already dead voters to sites after Election Day and simply added bundles of pre-made ballots during the counting process* (which explains the sudden jump in votes for Biden in Michigan and Wisconsin. The chart showing this surge has already become the unofficial symbol of this election).*

In turn, local election commissions constantly delayed the counting of real votes in order to make it easier for forgers to do their job:* They arranged breaks, weekends and smoke breaks.* When all the necessary votes were “delivered,” Trump’s 700,000 vote advantage in Pennsylvania with 5 million counted votes turned into a 35,000 vote advantage for Biden once all 6.6 million votes were counted. After that, the state, from the liberals’ point of view, was a Democratic win, and Biden earned the necessary number of electors to win.

In order to drown out skeptics’ voices that were already talking about fraud and ballot stuffing, the liberal majority of the Western media (Reuters, CNN, The New York Times and the rest of the news cohort) began to congratulate Biden as loudly as possible and on all corners.* To congratulate him and to drive his victory into everyone’s heads as an absolute and irrefutable fact. This is psychological legitimization.

Naturally, journalists were not at all bewildered that the official election results have not yet been tallied up. Not only were they not baffled, but also many foreign leaders began to congratulate Biden on his victory. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau of Canada, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, his Japanese counterpart Yoshihide Suga, the heads of Western states — and even Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and the self-proclaimed president of Belarus, Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya, congratulated him. In general, the entire Democratic army has done so.

They Clapped Poorly

Behind the wave of congratulations from foreigners, someone saw the outline of a world government. Some allege that “world leaders only accepted CNN’s election declaration so quickly and decided to quarrel with Trump because these actions had been prearranged in a conspiracy behind the scenes.” However, this is not entirely true.

Yes, foreign leaders actively participated in the creation of an informational campaign, proclaiming Biden’s victory and destroying everyone’s doubts about its legitimacy. Yet their participation and collective recognition of Biden is not the result of mass broadcasting from a “global president” or “board of directors,” but the result of their own banal interests.

Many of them had conflicts with Trump, so they were happy to join the game to “secure Biden’s uncontested victory.”*

All of these congratulations are helping Democrats to assure Republicans that their candidate’s defeat is a done deal. And also to explain that if the conservatives protest this, then they will be speaking out against U.S. allies abroad.

In addition, those who congratulated Biden based on CNN and The New York Times pronouncements simply didn’t want to spoil relations with the favorite in the presidential race. Waiting for the official results to celebrate a victory while others are already celebrating could look like a show of loyalty to Trump and elicit a cold attitude from the Biden administration. If people think that only in North Korea people can be shot for “not actively clapping enough,” then they would be wrong. American liberal society is quickly catching up with the Kim Jong Un fiefdom in terms of fundamentalism and contempt for free speech (we recall the Twitter censorship of Trump’s posts about election fraud, as well as Facebook’s “explanations” under all posts with images of vote counting graphs in Wisconsin and Michigan).

Finally, some people really wanted to establish themselves with the Democrats in the hope of swaying their policies in their favor — for example, the leader of the Republican People’s Party of Turkey, Kemal Kilicdaroglu. The Turkish opposition hopes that Biden will keep his promise given earlier and will take a much tougher line against President Recep Erdogan — including actions to change the regime in Ankara.

He Won’t Go Quietly

Yet the question is, did they rush to write off the current U.S. president? For four years Trump resisted all attacks, slander, pressure and blackmail from the liberal side of society. Now, apparently, he does not intend to give up. The head of state has already stated that he considers himself the winner of the election and intends to pursue the truth in the courts. It has gone all the way to the Supreme Court, which has already required that ballots received after Nov. 3 in Pennsylvania be counted separately, in case they decide to cancel these ballots. If they are canceled, then some mail-in ballots could be canceled in other states in the same way (in the United States, there is the principle of precedent).**

That’s not to mention the fact that a simple physical recount of the votes cast may show a slightly different result than the one given by the voting machines.*

Naturally, liberals are unhappy with the president’s approach. They consider his actions an “attempted coup” and practically promised him there would be street fighting in Philadelphia (the capital of Pennsylvania).*** CNN calls Trump’s claims “a brazen attack on our democracy.”

“Every legally cast vote should be counted. Every illegally cast vote should not. This should not be controversial. This is not a partisan statement — free and fair elections are the foundation of our democracy.” Ivanka Trump explains the meaning of democracy to liberal journalists.

Formally, Trump has a chance to win. In the same Supreme Court, six justices out of nine are Republicans,**** and of these six, three were personally nominated by the president. However, much will depend on whether Trump will enter this fight alone or whether the Republican Party will stand behind him.

Madness of the Brave?

Some people think that this should not be a question — Republicans must defend their victory. As former House Speaker Newt Gingrich noted, “This is about whether or not we as Americans are willing to look the other way while a system of elite left-wing corruption undermines our Democracy.” They should not, as conservative journalists write, allow the liberal media to choose the U.S. president. They have no right to disappoint their electorate, which dotes on Trump. They have no right to allow the left-wing elites of the Democratic Party to occupy the White House and begin their “progressive” reforms, which involve fighting conservative values, legalizing radical left-wing movements and their violent methods, expanding the Supreme Court (to dilute the Republican majority there), and so on.

Finally, they do not have the right to throw away the opportunity to prove election fraud and thus plunge the Democratic Party into a scandal worse than Watergate. Such a scandal would allow Republicans to retain power for several future election cycles. In fact, this is their only opportunity to preserve this power. Demographic trends in the United States show an increase in the Democratic electorate, including in the most important Republican stronghold — Texas.

That is why a Republican member of the House of Representatives, Kevin McCarthy, is confident that his party members “will not back down.”

However, the Republican Party has no definitive position yet. Some Republicans — for example, Trump’s biggest opponent, Mitt Romney — already acknowledged that the election is fair and that Trump’s claims of fraud are false. It is possible that others will follow Romney. Despite all of the bonuses from a possible victory, Republicans could be afraid to rock the boat and finally undermine Americans’ faith in American democracy. “It will seriously undermine the credibility of the most important institution of democracy, one of the foundations on which the entire political system of America is based. The legitimacy of the country itself will be undermined. And this is much more serious and fraught with the biggest of problems,” explains the famous Russian expert on America, Mikhail Taratuta.

So what will the Republicans ultimately choose? Their decision will now not only determine the name of the future U.S. president, but also the preservation of America’s image as a law-abiding country. A country whose president is elected not just by American liberals, but by the entire people.

*Editor’s note: This statement is not true and cannot be verified.

** Editor’s note: Republicans asked the U.S. Supreme Court to ensure county election officials were segregating mail ballots delivered after Election Day. On Nov. 6, Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., temporarily ordered county boards to comply with state guidelines to keep the late ballots separate.

***Editor’s note: Philadelphia is the largest city in the state of Pennsylvania, but the state capital is Harrisburg.

****Six current Supreme Court members were nominated by Republican presidents, including three by President Trump.