2021 Olympics Amid a US-China Political War?

Published in Nikkei
(Japan) on 14 November 2020
by Hiroyuki Akita (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Toya Jackson. Edited by Gillian Palmer.
COVID-19 continues to rob countless people around the world of their livelihoods. While it also depends on when a vaccine or miracle drug is developed, it would not be an exaggeration to say that this pandemic is a once-in-a-century phenomenon.

What we need to be even more cautious of now is COVID-19's potential to also endanger the world’s peace and security. As the infection spreads, the world’s economy is stagnating and people are losing their jobs. In order to survive domestic crises, we may begin to see countries implement strict measures against the outside world, and leaders may begin to incite nationalistic ideals. In other words, there is a risk that COVID-19 could further lead to the spreading of a “virus of conflict.”

The most apparent manifestation of that risk is the current tension between the United States and China. U.S.-China relations have continued to deteriorate since the beginning of the Donald Trump administration, but before the pandemic, tension centered around each country’s action and reaction in the fields of trade, technological hegemony and oceanic hegemony.

Increased Belief in the Communist Party’s Inherent Evil, and the Reimaging of that 'Evil' under COVID-19

As mentioned earlier, this is indeed a serious problem; however, if the blowback of U.S.-China tensions was strictly limited to those three areas, then it would have still been possible for the two nations to reach to some kind of agreement. Yet thanks to the COVID-19 pandemic, it is no longer that simple. To put it briefly, the U.S. and China are no longer engaged in a mere conflict of interests. Instead, the conflict has progressed to a visceral one in which the two countries now even condemn and refute the character and nature of the other’s philosophy. Specifically, since the crisis began, the U.S. government and Congress have assumed a new perspective toward China, one that regards the Communist Party as “inherently evil.” In simpler terms, it is the opinion that the culprit behind China’s continued violation of human rights and international order is none other than the authoritarian ideals of the Communist Party.

What caused U.S. distrust and suspicion of China to intensify to this extent? Regarding technological and oceanic hegemony, there was undoubtedly an undercurrent of accumulated dissatisfaction even before the pandemic. Nevertheless, COVID-19 was the straw that broke the camel’s back.

In the United States, a tremendous number of lives have been claimed by the pandemic. The American people are undeniably experiencing a level of grief and frustration unimaginable to the Japanese. Moreover, the current economic slump brought on by the virus is quite severe. The country is overflowing with people who have lost their jobs and have been forced to rely on unemployment benefits.

Filled with anger and no clear target at which to direct it, the people are taking it out not only on Trump for his mishandling of the situation, but on China. Because the Chinese Communist Party does not recognize a free media or freedom of speech, information regarding the virus during the early days of the pandemic was suppressed, and the infection ended up spreading to the rest of the world. This is all the fault of Chinese authoritarianism.

The future of U.S. policy toward China will focus more on addressing this “inherent evil” of the Communist Party.

Even the Incoming Biden Administration Cannot Change the Tide

It is unlikely that the trend in U.S. diplomacy with China will change even under the administration of former Vice President Joe Biden, who won the presidential election in November. Since the summer, Biden administration aides who are working on Biden’s plan for foreign policy and national security have been more persistently promoting the idea of “Biden diplomacy” at the online events of U.S. think tanks. Even within the team, the two individuals who held the biggest influence over Biden’s campaign pledges were Antony Blinken, former deputy secretary of state under the Barack Obama administration, and Jake Sullivan, currently one of Biden’s close advisers.

There are three key points that these two figures emphasize regarding the future of U.S. policy on China. The first point is that, even under the much anticipated Biden administration, the U.S. must not reduce the amount of pressure it is putting on China in order to pursue a more conciliatory approach. The second point is that, unlike what we saw during the Trump administration, going forward, it will be crucial that the U.S. strengthens its cooperation with allies such as Japan, Australia and Europe. The third point is that, also unlike President Trump, who made light of human rights and the situation in Hong Kong, Biden will address the issue head-on and work toward improvement.

Since it would be counterproductive for Biden to be seen as weak against China, there are times when he intentionally assumes a tough and unyielding stance. However, as the Biden administration has expressed its desire to work together with China to address the issue of climate change, there is some skepticism as to the extent Biden will maintain his tough facade. In any case, it is unlikely that the Biden administration will ever set U.S.-China relations as far back as the Obama administration did during its first term.

What is problematic is that we are not sure if, in the future, the tension between the two countries will remain limited to diplomacy and politics, or if there is a possibility that things could escalate into a military confrontation. The answer to this cannot be found by observing U.S. policy on China alone. We must also look at things from Beijing’s perspective and consider the damages and the changes in China’s policy on the United States due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Xi Jinping’s administration has announced that it has put a stop to the infection's spread. However, despite this victory declaration, the resulting damage the country is facing due to the virus is serious — the biggest impact of all being the effect on the economy. While the country’s gross domestic product has increased, that same prosperity is not reflected in the country’s employment rates. The retail, food service and hotel industries — the industries most in need of employment assistance — still show no signs of recovering.

It will be longer yet until restaurant, hotel and retail businesses return to their pre-COVID glory, and the country is currently experiencing its highest rate of unemployment since China began its reform and opening-up policy in 1979. It is undeniable that Chairman Xi and top Chinese officials are more than anxious over this fact, considering that before long, the anger and dissatisfaction of the unemployed could turn into fervent criticism of the Communist Party.

The increased criticism from the U.S. and other leading countries as to China’s responsibility in the outbreak is another strike against the party’s authoritarianism. Until now, Chairman Xi promised that China would become a superpower and surpass the U.S. by 2050, and he tried to garner the Chinese people’s respect and affirmation as a “great leader.” If the world blames him for the COVID-19 pandemic, then all of his efforts would have been in vain.

The Possibility of Military Escalation

What is concerning going forward is the risk that the U.S. and China’s back-and-forth exchange of hard-line measures will escalate and cause a military confrontation. If such a thing were to happen, the issue would likely be one concerning the South China Sea or the Taiwan Strait. If the confrontation is over the South China Sea, then, even if China and the U.S. resort to military force, it is unlikely to cause a full-scale war. However, if the confrontation were to happen over Taiwan, then there is admittedly a chance it could result in an all-out war. This is due to the fact that China considers Taiwan to be a part of its domain, and has made it clear that it is not against the use of military force if foreign powers intervene.

Even if things do not immediately escalate into a U.S.-China confrontation, as of mid-August, China was carrying out military exercises in the Taiwan Strait, and there is a risk that military tension will continue to rise.

Someday, a vaccine will be developed and the rate of infection will finally dwindle. When that happens, COVID-19 will likely lose its momentum. However, this other “virus” (of conflict) that has already invaded and begun to erode the relationship between the United States and China will not disappear so easily.


米中、「政治戦争」のトンネルに 日本の論点2021


新型コロナウイルスは世界中の人々の命を奪い続けている。ワクチンや特効薬がいつできるかにもよるが、100年に1度のウイルス禍といっても過言ではないだろう。

いま私たちが警戒を強めなければならないのは、新型コロナが世界の平和や安全保障をも壊しかねない毒性を帯びていることだ。感染が広がるにつれ、世界中で経済の活動が滞り、たくさんの失業が生まれている。内政の窮地を乗り切るため、対外的に強硬な行動に出て、ナショナリズムをあおるリーダーも出てきかねない。つまり、新型コロナは「紛争ウイルス」を拡散させる危険を帯びているのだ。

そうしたリスクをいちばん明確に示しているのが、米国と中国の対立だ。トランプ政権が始まって以来、米中関係はこじれ続けてきたが、コロナ危機までは「通商」、「ハイテク覇権」、「海洋覇権」の3つの分野がその攻防の中心だった。

■広がる共産党性悪論、コロナ危機で様変わりした構図

すでに触れたように、これらは深刻な問題だが、米中対立がこの3分野だけにとどまっていれば、両国の手打ちは不可能ではなかった。しかし、コロナ危機が発生したことによって、構図は様変わりした。結論から先に言えば、米中はただの利害争いではなく、互いの「人格」や「性質」を嫌悪し、否定する生理的な対立の段階に突入してしまったのである。具体的には、コロナ危機を受けて米政府や米議会では、「共産党性悪論」ともいうべき対中観が急速に広がっている。わかりやすく言えば、「中国が人権や国際ルールに反する言動を続けるのは、共産党の独裁体制そのものに元凶がある」という見方だ。

ワシントンの対中不信感はなぜ、ここまで深まってしまったのだろうか。ハイテクや海洋覇権をめぐり、コロナ前から積み重なった不満が底流にあることは間違いない。しかし、決定的だったのがコロナ危機の勃発である。

米国ではコロナウイルスによってすさまじい数の死者を出している。日本では想像できないほど、深い悲しみやいらだち、怒りが米国社会に充満しているにちがいない。コロナ禍に伴う不況も深刻だ。職を奪われ、失業給付金に頼る人々があふれた。

こうしたやり場のない怒りは、対応を誤ったトランプ大統領だけでなく、中国にも向けられている。中国共産党が報道や言論の自由を認めないから、新型ウイルスの発生が当初、現場で隠蔽され、感染が世界に広がってしまった。悪いのは中国の独裁体質だ……。

米国の対中政策の重心は今後、さらに共産党性悪論者の側に移っていくだろう。

■バイデン政権誕生でも潮流は変わらない

こうした米国の対中外交の潮流は、11月の米大統領選で当選を確実にしたバイデン前副大統領の下でも変わらないだろう。バイデン陣営で外交・安全保障のブレーンを務める側近たちは2020年夏以降、シンクタンクのオンライン会議に登場し、「バイデン外交」について発信を強めている。なかでもバイデン氏の公約づくりに大きな影響力を持つのが、オバマ政権で国務副長官を務めたトニー・ブリンケン氏と、当時、バイデン副大統領の補佐官(国家安全保障担当)だったジェイク・サリバン氏だ。

対中政策について2人が強調しているのは主に3つの点である。第1に、「バイデン政権」が誕生しても、中国への圧力を弱めたり、融和的な政策に転じたりすることはない。第2に、トランプ政権と異なり、日本やオーストラリア、欧州などの同盟国と連携を深め、一緒に対中政策を進めていく。第3に、トランプ大統領が軽視している人権や香港問題をバイデン氏は真正面から取り上げ、改善を求めていくという。

バイデン氏が対中弱腰とみられることは望ましくないため、ことさらタフな姿勢を強調している面はある。バイデン陣営は気候変動問題では中国と協力する方針を示しており、どこまで対中強硬を貫けるのか、疑う向きもある。だが、これらの点を割り引いたとしても、「バイデン政権」でオバマ前政権の1期目のような対中協調路線に逆戻りすることはないだろう。

そこで問題になるのは、今後、両大国の緊張が外交や政治の領域にとどまるのか、軍事衝突の危険を帯びるほどまでにエスカレートしてしまうのか、である。この答えは、米国の対中政策だけを観察してもみつからない。視点を北京に移し、コロナ危機がもたらしたダメージと対米政策への影響について、中国側の視点からながめてみよう。

習近平政権は、感染の拡大に歯止めをかけたとけん伝している。しかし、こうした勝利宣言とは裏腹にコロナ危機が中国にもたらした傷はとても深い。とりわけ大きいのは、経済への影響だ。国内総生産(GDP)の実質成長率はプラスに転じているが、人々の生活に直結する雇用の改善にはつながっていない。雇用のいちばんの受け皿である小売りや飲食、ホテルといったサービス業は相変わらず、立ち直る兆しがない。

レストランやホテル、小売店の営業がコロナ前の状態に戻るには程遠く、中国は改革開放が始まった1979年以来、最悪ともいえる失業者を抱えている。習近平国家主席ら中国首脳部は、背筋が寒くなるほどの不安を感じているにちがいない。失業者の怒りや不満がやがて、激しい共産党批判に転化しかねないからである。

コロナ禍をめぐり、米国をはじめとする主要国で中国責任論が広がっていることも、共産党の統治体制には逆風だ。習近平主席はこれまで、50年までに中国を米国をしのぐ超大国にすると約束し、「偉大なリーダー」として中国人から支持と尊敬を集めようとしてきた。世界中から新型コロナの責任を追及される事態になったら、このシナリオが狂ってしまう。

■軍事的な緊張が一気に高まる恐れ

今後、気がかりなのは、米中による強硬策の応酬が軍事衝突につながる危険だ。そうしたリスクがあるとすれば、南シナ海と台湾海峡である。戦域が南シナ海であれば、万一、米中が軍事衝突したとしても、全面戦争に火がつく可能性はそれほど高くないだろう。だが、台湾をめぐって米中がぶつかれば、全面戦争になってしまう危険がある。中国は台湾を領土の一部とみなしており、外国勢力が介入すれば、武力行使を排除しない姿勢を明確にしているからだ。

今後、ただちに米中紛争に発展することはないにしても、中国は8月半ば、台湾海峡などで軍事演習を強行しており、軍事的な緊張がさらに高まる恐れがある。

いつかワクチンや特効薬が開発され、感染が収束する日はやってくる。そうなれば、新型コロナは勢いを失うだろう。だが、いったん米中関係に侵入し、その巨体をむしばんでいる「ウイルス」はそう簡単には消えない。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Thailand: Donald Trump Buys Time with Weapons for Kyiv

Sri Lanka: As Albanese Stands Tall, Let’s Stand by Her

Ireland: US Tariffs Take Shine Off Summer Economic Statement

Indonesia: Trump’s 19% Tariffs: How Should We Respond?

Spain: The New American Realism

Topics

Spain: The New American Realism

Mexico: Trump vs. Cuba: More of the Same

Ireland: US Tariffs Take Shine Off Summer Economic Statement

Israel: Epstein Conspiracy: When the Monster Has a Life of Its Own and Rises Up

Spain: Another Threat from Trump

Canada: Negotiating a Business Deal without Trust

Taiwan: Tariff Showdown Doesn’t Shake Confidence

Related Articles

Poland: Putin’s Biggest Mistake — Will Trump Force Him to the Negotiating Table?*

France: Trump and the African Presidents: The Weight of Words, Shock of the Image

Germany: Trump’s Tariffs: China Acts, Europe Reacts

Indonesia: Trump Needs a Copy Editor

Australia: As Trump Turns His Back on Renewables, China Is Building the Future