‘Extended Deterrence’ Pushes Japan Farther down the Wrong Path

Published in Guangming Daily
(China) on 1 August 2024
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Jo Sharp. Edited by Michelle Bisson.
Strengthening "extended deterrence," upgrading the U.S.-Japan military alliance, attacking and smearing China.
Japanese actions during recent meetings such as the U.S.-Japan Security Consultative Committee "2+2" meeting and the extended deterrence ministerial meeting have triggered significant concerns in the region. Many Japanese people have protested that the government's moves are fanning the flames and going farther and farther down the wrong path toward war.

Among Japan's reckless activity, the most questionable is strengthening "extended deterrence" with the United States. Extended deterrence is a Cold War-era concept and refers to the U.S. commitment to use military force, including nuclear weapons, to protect its allies. U.S. and Japanese diplomatic and defense departments have been holding working-level discussions of this issue since 2010 and this year established a separate ministerial structure. At the first extended deterrence ministerial meeting held recently, the U.S. and Japan affirmed the importance of sharing the U.S. nuclear umbrella. To outside observers, Japan’s move violates the obligations of non-nuclear-weapon states under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, will increase the risk of nuclear proliferation and conflict and further escalate tensions in the region.

Ironically, Japan has long portrayed itself as a victim of nuclear attack, advocating for a world without nuclear weapons, yet in reality it has said one thing but done another by continuing to increase its dependence on the U.S. nuclear arsenal. In May 2023, the Japanese government announced the "Hiroshima Vision," focusing on nuclear disarmament, but has made no concrete progress since. Japan's recent reinforcement of extended deterrence violates a commitment to its own "Three Non-Nuclear Principles" and shows that it seeks more protection under the U.S. nuclear umbrella. But is the United States really reliable? Analysts have pointed out that America's so-called extended deterrence is about strengthening its own global military hegemony and boosting its leverage with other countries. This significantly increases Japan's risk of being drawn into war, even nuclear war. In other words, the U.S. nuclear umbrella brings danger, not security, to Japan.

However, some Japanese politicians, brainwashed by militarism, ignore the voice of reason and are obsessed with strengthening the military. On this occasion, with active efforts from Japan, the U.S. and Japan agreed at the "2+2" meeting to upgrade their military alliance. This includes the U.S. restructuring its forces in Japan and the establishment of a new Joint Forces Command. The Japan Self-Defense Forces will establish a Joint Operations Command by spring 2025 to integrate the operations of its land, sea and air forces. By upgrading the alliance's command structure, Japan is demonstrating that it seeks to make more use of U.S. military power to enhance its security status in the region and around the world. Its ambitions for military expansion are clear.

It is worth noting that while the U.S.-Japan alliance hangs onto Cold War thinking, by carrying out small circle bloc activities and increasing the risk of nuclear proliferation, it is simultaneously attacking China’s ongoing rapid expansion of its nuclear arsenal. It is an attempt to mislead and obscure its own impact on international security. However it is obvious to the world that China has long pursued a no-first-use nuclear policy and stuck to a strategy of nuclear self-defense. It has always maintained its nuclear forces at the lowest level needed for national security and not engaged in an arms race. By contrast, Japan has repeatedly violated the restrictions in its post-war peace constitution, trying to achieve military freedom through dependence on the U.S. and repeating the mistakes of militarism. Such regressive behavior not only betrays the pursuit of human peace but also overlooks the lessons of history.

Under Article 9 of Japan's peace constitution, Japan clearly renounces the right to wage war and agrees to follow the path of peaceful development. As a defeated nation in World War II, Japan should reflect deeply on the lessons from history, not seek any kind of nuclear weapons in any form and avoid going farther and farther down the wrong path of military expansion. Otherwise it may once again gamble with its country’s fate.


 强化“延伸威慑”、升级日美军事同盟、攻击抹黑中国……在近日召开的日美外交安全“2+2”会议、“延伸威慑”部长会等会议期间,日本一系列动作引发地区国家高度警惕。不少日本民众抗议说,日本政府的举动是在拱火,也是在“迈向战争”的错误道路上越走越远。

在日本的危险动向中,最受质疑的是与美国强化“延伸威慑” 。所谓“延伸威慑”是冷战时期的产物,意指美国承诺使用包括核武器在内的军事力量保护盟国。2010年以来,日美外交与防务部门一直就这个问题进行事务级别磋商,今年还建立了独立的部长级框架。在近日首次召开的“延伸威慑”部长会议上,日美确认了共享美国“核保护伞”的重要性。在外界看来,日方此举违反了《不扩散核武器公约》规定的无核武器国家义务,将加剧核扩散与核冲突风险,进一步刺激地区紧张局势。

  讽刺的是,日本长期以“核爆受害国”自居,宣扬建立“无核武世界”,实际上却不断增强对美国的核依赖,属于说一套做一套。2023年5月,日本政府在广岛宣布了以核裁军为重点的“广岛愿景”,但至今没有取得任何具体进展。此次日本强化“延伸威慑”,违背了自身“无核三原则”的承诺,表明它希望得到美国“核保护伞”更多的保护。然而,美国真的靠得住吗?分析人士指出,对于美国而言,所谓“延伸威慑”是为了强化自身全球军事霸权,增强与其他国家对抗的筹码,而这势必会大大增加日本被卷入战争甚至核战争的风险。换句话说,美国“核保护伞”给日本带来的不是安全,而是危险。

  然而,被军国主义洗脑的日本某些政客听不进去理性声音,执迷于强军扩武。这一次,在日本主动争取下,日美还在两国外交安全“2+2”会议上商定升级军事同盟,包括美方将重组驻日美军、设立新的“统合军司令部”,日本自卫队在2025年春季前成立“统合作战司令部”、负责日本陆海空自卫队一体化运用的任务等。这一举措表明,通过升级同盟指挥体系,日本试图更多借助美国的军事力量,提升自身在地区乃至全球的安全地位,其军事扩张的野心可谓昭然若揭。

值得注意的是,日美同盟一边抱持冷战思维搞小圈子、不断增加核扩散风险,一边反过头来攻击“中国持续快速扩展核武库”,试图混淆视听,掩盖自身冲击国际安全的事实。但世界有目共睹,长期以来,中国奉行不首先使用核武器政策,坚持自卫防御的核战略,始终将自身的核力量维持在国家安全需要的最低水平,不与任何人搞军备竞赛。反观日本,它一再突破战后“和平宪法”的限制,意图通过依附美国实现军事松绑,重蹈军国主义覆辙。这种历史倒退的行为不仅是对人类和平事业的背叛,也是对历史教训的遗忘。

  日本“和平宪法”第9条明确规定了日本放弃战争权、追求和平发展的道路。作为二战战败国,日本应该深刻反思历史教训,不以任何形式寻求核武器,不要在强军扩武的歧路上越走越远,否则它可能会再次赌上自己的国运。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Russia: Will Trump Investigate Harris? Political Analyst Responds*

Austria: The Harvard President’s Voluntary Pay Cut Is a Strong Signal

Austria: Soon Putin Will Have Successfully Alienated Trump

Canada: Scorning Trump’s Golden Dome Would Be a Mistake

Topics

Austria: Soon Putin Will Have Successfully Alienated Trump

Canada: Scorning Trump’s Golden Dome Would Be a Mistake

Australia: Which Conflicts of Interest? Trump Doubles Down on Crypto

Russia: Will Trump Investigate Harris? Political Analyst Responds*

Germany: Ukraine War: Cease-fire Still Out of Reach

Japan: Expectations for New Pope To Mend Rifts among American People

OPD: 16 May 2025, edited by Helaine Schweitzer

Related Articles

Hong Kong: The Lessons of World War II: The Real World Importance of Resisting Hegemony

Japan: Trump’s 100 Days: A Future with No Visible Change So Far

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China