Academy Awards: The Demolition Brigade, Stars of the U.S.’ “Chinese New Year Gala”?

Published in Nanfang Daily
(China) on 10 March 2010
by Guo Dong (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Sarah Chan. Edited by Joanne Hanrahan.
The 82nd Annual Academy Awards have come to a close, with an unexpected loss for the popular film "Avatar." Its rival, "The Hurt Locker," took home a total of six awards which included Best Picture and Best Director, making Kathryn Bigelow the first woman in Oscar history to win the Best Director award, whereas "Avatar" only won three pathetic technological awards.

According to one expert's opinion, the Oscars make up for the United States' lack of a State Administration of Radio, Film and Television. The Oscars are just like the Chinese New Year Gala. We don't know whether or not Americans watch the Chinese New Year Gala, and the Oscars are normally none of our business, but the media deliberately makes life difficult. Reading the newspaper these past few days has made me incredibly angry. This year March 8th marks the 100 year anniversary of International Women's Day and in the Oscars' 82-year history, Bigelow is the first female to win Best Director. However, newspaper headlines are full of phrases like "the "'Avatar' director's ex-wife." She is a fine career woman who is suddenly written off as being "someone's wife." Gender equality has a long way to go.

There are people who look ahead to the future, unlike those of us who don't get the big picture. During the NPC (National People's Congress) and CPPCC (Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference) annual conferences, a member of CPPCC said that thus far, "Avatar" has had a worldwide net profit of $1.9 billion, equivalent to 13 billion RMB. Over the past year, China's per capita net income for rural residents was 5,153 RMB. "Avatar's" net income is equivalent to approximately the total net income of 2.51 million Chinese farmers in 2009. These numbers tell us that developing the cultural sector is urgent and imperative. China needs to have its own "Avatar."

The problem is that although we can't say "Avatar" is everywhere in China, it is definitely nothing new. According to newspaper reports, everywhere from Beijing to Guangdong to Hainan, there have been people putting up heroic banners at demolition sites that say "We Are Avatars," and some also staged a live-action version of "Avatar." Even in Tsoi Yuen Tsuen, Hong Kong, residents affected by demolition to make way for the high-speed rail booked a whole theater to watch the 3D version. It is said that the many uncles and aunties [Editor's note: this is a respectful way to refer to an older generation in Chinese] that were watching were in tears. After seeing this movie's influence on all levels of society, it's hard for Chinese people to understand it losing Best Picture to "The Hurt Locker."

However, Americans don't think so. "Avatar" brings new challenges to the film industry; not only is it important for the future development of the films, it also affects the jobs of many Hollywood employees. Just imagine: if everything was computerized, from then on, movie stars could just scan their faces into the computer and go home to sleep; there would be no need for actors. Therefore, when voting, it goes without saying that Hollywood needs to "unite" and fight to strangle the monster of "dissimilation" in its crib. "The Hurt Locker" is different; its reflection on the theme of the Iraq war is politically correct and in line with Hollywood's left-wing anti-war Liberal values. This win was not without justification.

In evaluating Hollywood and the Oscars, people insist on following their own interests, hence, the sound of "we need our own ‘Avatar,’ we need our own Oscars" is ringing in our ears. I do not agree. The U.S. has the Oscars, we have our Chinese New Year Gala; the U.S. has a bomb squad ("The Hurt Locker"), we have a demolition brigade. When we compare ourselves in this way, who fears whom in the world is not obvious. The issue is that their bomb squad was able to attend the Oscars, and took home the top award; our demolition brigade goes anywhere and everywhere, just not the Chinese New Year Gala. Some netizens made a few changes to the Chinese movie poster of "The Hurt Locker," making the title of the movie into "The Demolition Brigade." It looks almost exactly the same, and is often seen on the cover of pirated copies of the movie, marked by the award-winning olive branch symbol. At this stage, a Best Picture win for a Chinese film can only be in our dreams.


奥斯卡颁奖礼,拆“迁”部队领衔“美国春晚”?

第82届奥斯卡颁奖典礼曲终人散,事前大热的《阿凡达》意外败下阵来。其竞争对手《拆弹部队》共拿下包括最佳影片、最佳导演在内的六项大奖,该片凯瑟琳·毕格罗也由此成为奥斯卡史上首位最佳女导演,而《阿凡达》只收获了三个可怜的技术奖项。

按照某专业人士的意见,奥斯卡弥补了美国没有广电总局的缺憾,奥斯卡颁奖礼相当于春晚而已。美国人看不看中国春晚咱不知道,按理说奥斯卡颁奖没咱什么事儿。可是媒体偏偏跟咱过不去,这几天看报纸我气得不行:好歹今年三八是全世界劳动妇女百年一遇的纪念日,82年历史的奥斯卡也就出了这么一位女性最佳导演,可报纸上大小标题一口一个阿凡达导演“前妻”,人家好好一职业女性,一下子“矮化”成了“人妻”。性别平等之路何其任重道远啊。

也有人高瞻远瞩,不像咱这么没有大局观。两会上有全国政协委员说了,一部《阿凡达》迄今全球净赚19亿美元,相当于129.58亿元人民币。过去一年,中国农村居民人均纯收入5153元人民币,《阿凡达》净收益约相当于 251万中国农民2009年纯收入总和。这一堆数字告诉我们,加强文化产业建设迫在眉睫。意思是,中国要有自己的阿凡达。

问题是,神州热土上,阿凡达不说遍地都是,起码屡见不鲜。据报载,北京、广东、海南各处都有遭遇强拆的居民打出“我们就是阿凡达”的壮烈标语不说,有的还上演了活人3D版阿凡达。甚至于在香港,受高铁拆迁影响的菜园村居民包场看3D版,据说很多阿伯师奶看得老泪纵横。鉴于《阿凡达》在官方民间各个层面的影响力,输给《拆弹部队》,按照咱们中国人的理解,怎么也说不过去。

可是老美不这么看。《阿凡达》给电影工业带来的全新挑战,不仅事关未来电影发展路向,更事关许多好莱坞员工的饭碗。试想一下,啥都电脑化了,明星们今后把脸扫进电脑里回家睡觉得了,还要你演员这一行干嘛。所以,投票的时候,好莱坞理所当然要“联合起来”斗争一下,将“异化”恶魔扼杀于摇篮中。《拆弹部队》则不同,属于反映伊战题材,政治正确,符合好莱坞自由左派的反战价值观,今次胜出,也不是没有道理。

在评价好莱坞、奥斯卡这件事上,国人硬要按自己的意思来,于是,我们要有自己的阿凡达,我们要有自己的奥斯卡,此类声音不绝于耳。我倒不这么看。美国有奥斯卡,咱们也有春晚啊;美国有拆弹部队,咱们也有拆迁大队啊。这么一比,世界上不见得谁怕谁。问题在于,人家的拆弹部队能上奥斯卡,还拿头名;咱们的拆迁大队哪儿都上,就是不上春晚。有网民把《拆弹部队》电影海报划拉了几下,变成“拆迁部队”,还似模似样,画上盗版封套上常见,由橄榄枝镶嵌的获奖标记。现阶段,也只能如此望梅解渴了吧。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Topics

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

India: World in Flux: India Must See Bigger Trade Picture

Palestine: US vs. Ansarallah: Will Trump Launch a Ground War in Yemen for Israel?

Ukraine: Trump Faces Uneasy Choices on Russia’s War as His ‘Compromise Strategy’ Is Failing

Related Articles

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Hong Kong: Can US Tariffs Targeting Hong Kong’s ‘Very Survival’ Really Choke the Life out of It?

Cuba: Trump, Panama and the Canal

China: White House Peddling Snake Oil as Medicine

China: Prime Take: How Do Americans View US Tariff Hikes?