CNN and Obama: A Way Paved With Promises and Fiction

Published in Sme
(Slovakia) on 2 November 2008
by Martin Pancuska (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Denisa Rinakova. Edited by Bridgette Blight.
As the experienced say, usually after the elections the winner corrects his promises. Thanks to those made by Barack Obama and thanks to the popularity supported but also created by the media Obama is keeping “colossal” lead of 5 percent before his adversary.

Those monstrous promises are a good reason for the Americans to leave them as well as the remarkableness of the first colored candidate for U.S. president as a history.

McCain with his realistic program and approach to the biggest problems stays with his feet on ground.

That’s why his popularity and stays behind the “catastrophic” 5 percent. If he was leading by 5 percent, would we be saying about McCain – mania in the media? Surely not, instead we’d be saying about a disaster. But with confidence about Obama – mania if the Democratic candidate leads by 15 percent. If he was leading by 15 percent how would the media call it?

Maybe that’s why it’s better to pay attention to the influence of the media.

Today, I watched a WORLD REPORT and AFRICA INSIDE programs on CNN. Guess, what name was heard the most there? Interviews with “randomly” selected respondents created a picture of people’s approach to the U.S. presidential elections in Europe and Africa. Do you think that they spoke about both candidates? No. If Obama is ‘pushed’ by the media in Europe as well as in Africa, however, here but also there, are those who like McCain. Do you think that they had a chance to express that? No.

Do you think that if the Slovak television did similar reports in near countries for example in the countries of V4 (Visegrad Group) where it would openly favor one candidate in our presidential elections, let’s say the one you don’t prefer but he would be better for foreign countries would you like that? I know, not. And me neither.

I think that Obamamania is a intentional marketing phenomena which is intended to provoke emotional expectations of brilliant change. And also massive bombarding American voters by expectations of “world public opinion” shall help to swamp Bush.

McCain is not Bush, America is not Europe, and CNN is not omnipotent. I hope that Europe will never be a part of the United States and that CNN will never be omnipotent. That’s why I hope that the Americans will vote for an American president.


CNN a Obama = cesta vydláždená s?ubmi a fikciou.

Ako hovoria skúsení - po vo?bách zvykne ví?az volieb korigova? svoje s?uby. Obama v?aka tým svojim a aj médiami podporovanej (a aj vytváranej) popularite si zatia? udržiava "kolosálny" náskok 5 %. Tie s?uby svojou kolosálnos?ou sú dobrým dôvodom na to, aby ich ameri?ania radšej ponechali histórii ako zaujímavos? prvého farebného kandidáta na post prezidenta USA.


McCain so svojim realistickým programom a prístupom k najvä?ším problémom zostáva pri zemi. Preto jeho popularita a mediálna ob?úbenos? zaostáva "katastrofálnych" 5 %. Ak by v prieslkumoch o 5% viedol, hovorilo by sa v médiách o mccain - mánii? Ur?ite nie, ale ako o hroziacej katastrofe. No s istotou obamamánia, ke? demoratický kandidát vedie o pár percent. Keby viedol o 15%, ako by to potom médiá nazvali?

Preto asi sa pred vplyvom médií radšej treba ma? na pozore.

Dnes som si pozrel na CNN relácie WORLD REPORT a AFRICA INSIDE. Hádaj, ktoré priezvisko sa v týchto reláciách vyskytovalo naj?astejšie? Rozhovory s "náhodnými" aj vyberanými respondentmi vytvárali obraz postojov ?udí v Európe aj Afrike k prezidentským vo?bám v USA. Myslíš si, že sa v reláciách objavovali vyjadrenia k obom kandidátom? Nie. Hoci je Obama protežovaný ako v Európe, tak aj v Afrike, aj tu, aj tam sú však sympatizanti McCaina. Myslíš si, že dostali priestor? Nie.

Myslíš si, že keby slovenská spravodajská televízia robila podobné relácie v okolitých krajinách, napr. v krajinách V4, a nezakrývane by protežovala jedného z dvoch kandidátov v našich prezidentských vo?bách, povedzme toho, ktorý by bol tvoj neob?úbený, no pre zahrani?ie prijate?nejší, že by sa ti to pá?ilo? Ja viem, že nie. A ani mne.

Myslím si, že obamamánia je marketingový jav vyvolaný ú?elne, ktorý má za úlohu vzbudi? emotívne o?akávania úžasnej zmeny. A tiež masívnym bombardovaním amerických voli?ov o?akávaniami "verejnej svetovej mienky" má dopomôc? porazi? na hlavu Busha.

No McCain nie je Bush, Amerika nie je Európa a CNN nie je všemocná. Dúfam, že Európa sa sú?as?ou Ameriky nikdy nestane, a že ani CNN všemocná nikdy nebude. Preto dúfam, že ameri?ania si za prezidenta zvolia ameri?ana.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Mexico: EU: Concern for the Press

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Germany: Cynicism, Incompetence and Megalomania

Topics

Mexico: EU: Concern for the Press

Austria: Musk, the Man of Scorched Earth

Germany: Cynicism, Incompetence and Megalomania

Switzerland: Donald Trump: 100 Days Already, but How Many Years?

     

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Related Articles

Ukraine: Can National Reconciliation Defeat Populism?

Slovakia: What’s Good for General Motors…

Slovakia: Symbolic Landing

Slovakia: President Obama: First Half or First Quarter?

Slovakia: China Fears Dispatches More than the U.S.