Biden’s (Risky) Gamble on Immigration

Published in Corriere della Sera
(Italy) on 20 June 2024
by Massimo Gaggi (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Laurence Bouvard. Edited by Helaine Schweitzer.
Joe Biden has struck out on his own with two executive orders from the White House. With the first, he imposed a virtual ban on requests for asylum; none will be granted if arrivals in the U.S. exceed 1,500 a day. With the second, he opened a path to citizenship for immigrants without documentation who have been living in the U.S. for at least 10 years and are married to an American citizen.

One week from a face-to-face TV debate with Donald Trump, Joe Biden is seeking subjects that will get his adversary into trouble around abortion, Trump's legal problems, and his scant respect for democratic structures — issues that please Trump fans but terrify a major part of moderate America. However, the president will also have to defend himself on his own weak points, such as the U.S. role in the Gaza conflict, but more importantly, the increase in prices (a global issue with the pandemic, but a shock for middle America, which, for various reasons, did not even know the meaning of the word inflation) and illegal immigration. With inflation now tamed — though the damage inflicted in 2022-2023 remains — Biden, having wrongly ignored the problem for two years, is focusing on the now overwhelming immigration issue, the crisis that alarms citizens the most, according to opinion polls. The president sought to put a brake on entries into the country by imposing a restrictive law that Republicans support. An agreement that was made, but never passed; Trump loyalists in Congress admitted that the former president torpedoed the bill. Seeking to base his presidential campaign platform on the chaos at the Mexican border, Trump had no wish to see anyone defuse the immigration crisis.

Biden has thus struck out on his own with two executive orders from the White House. With the first, he imposed a virtual ban on requests for asylum: none will be granted if arrivals in the U.S. exceed 1,500 a day. With the second, he opened a path to citizenship for immigrants without documentation who have been living in the U.S. for at least 10 years and are married to an American citizen. The president is following in the footsteps of Barack Obama who, after being called the “Deporter-in-Chief” for the high number of deportations he ordered, opened a window during the 2012 presidential campaign for Dreamers, people brought to the United States illegally as children by family.*

Obama won. Will Biden succeed, too? The general impression is that the risks are great: Latinos, who are the most sensitive about immigration issues, are continuing to drain away from Biden toward Trump, while the right and the left are attacking Biden’s most seemingly well-balanced policies. On the right, Trumpists from America First Legal decried Biden’s immigration move as “one of the largest executive amnesties in American history.” On the left, the American Civil Liberties Union has sued Biden, accusing him of denying a fundamental human right to asylum seekers fleeing from brutal dictatorships.

*Editor’s note: The term dreamers is derived from never-passed legislation called the DREAM Act, short for Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors, which would have allowed young immigrants in the U.S. illegally to remain if they met certain requirements.


La scommessa (rischiosa) di Biden sull'immigrazione

di Massimo Gaggi | 20 giugno 2024

Biden si è mosso da solo con due misure della Casa Bianca: con la prima ha imposto un quasi blocco degli ingressi dei richiedenti asilo: stop se gli arrivi superano i 1500 al giorno. Con la seconda ha aperto un percorso di cittadinanza per i clandestini negli Usa da almeno 10 anni, sposati con un americano

A una settimana dal primo faccia a faccia televisivo con Donald Trump, Joe Biden cerca argomenti per mettere in difficoltà l’avversario sull’aborto, i guai giudiziari, e il suo scarso rispetto per i meccanismi della democrazia: cosa che piace ai suoi fan ma spaventa larga parte dell’America moderata. Il presidente dovrà, però, anche difendersi sui suoi punti vulnerabili. Vale a dire il ruolo Usa nel conflitto di Gaza, ma soprattutto l’aumento dei prezzi (mondiale con la pandemia, ma uno choc per mezza America che per motivi anagrafici nemmeno conosceva il significato della parola inflazione) e l’immigrazione clandestina. Con l’inflazione ormai domata (ma il danno fatto nel 2022-2023 rimane) Biden (dopo aver colpevolmente ignorato il problema per due anni) si è concentrato su migrazioni divenute, ormai, imponenti: l’emergenza che più spaventa i cittadini, secondo vari sondaggi. Il presidente ha cercato di frenare gli ingressi con una legge restrittiva concordata coi repubblicani. Accordo fatto, ma mai votato: lo ha fatto naufragare Trump, sconfessando i suoi parlamentari: volendo fare campagna elettorale sul caos al confine col Messico non voleva vedere l’emergenza immigrati disinnescata.
Così Biden si è mosso da solo con due misure della Casa Bianca: con la prima ha imposto un quasi blocco degli ingressi dei richiedenti asilo: stop se gli arrivi superano i 1500 al giorno. Con la seconda ha aperto un percorso di cittadinanza per i clandestini negli Usa da almeno 10 anni, sposati con un americano. Il presidente segue le orme di Obama che durante la campagna elettorale del 2012, soprannominato deporter-in-chief per il gran numero dei rimpatri forzati da lui decisi, aprì una finestra per i dreamers, i ragazzi figli di clandestini cresciuti negli Usa. Obama la spuntò. Riuscirà anche Biden? La sensazione è che rischi grosso: continua l’emorragia di ispanici, i più sensibili sull’immigrazione, che passano a Trump, mentre le sue misure ben bilanciate apparentemente , vengono attaccate tanto da destra quanto da sinistra. A destra i trumpiani di America First Legal denunciano la manovra di Biden come «la più grande amnistia della storia Usa». A sinistra la Lega per i diritti civili (ACLU) ha denunciato Biden in tribunale: accusato di negare un diritto umano fondamentale ai richiedenti asilo in fuga da dittature feroci.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Topics

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Related Articles

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

U.K.: The Guardian View on Donald Trump’s Industrial Policy: Inward Turn by Ultimatum

Poland: America’s Suicide: Trump’s Trade War*

Italy : How To Respond to Trump’s Tariffs without Disturbing Beijing