America's "Bunker Mentality"

Published in Tianjin
(China) on 20 September 2012
by Yu Manyi (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Jessica Whale. Edited by .

Edited by Gillian Palmer

After the "Arab Spring," daily news commentator Yu Manyi followed "dictators" in the Middle East falling from power, one after another; Americans naively believed the world was becoming safer. However, last week's events taught them a lesson: Angry people besieged the United States embassies in Egypt, Libya, Yemen and Tunisia, as well as embassies in over 20 countries. The United States Ambassador to Libya and three workers lost their lives in the attack there. Americans are, perhaps, innocent but not necessarily fools; they should comprehend that not everyone likes them.

This isn't the first time a United States embassy has been under attack. Actually, the U.S. foreign embassies haven't been peaceful since the 1980s. A country's embassy tends to have two tasks: to protect the diplomats and to maintain a personable image while also representing their country's image. Generally speaking, you cannot over-emphasize one task; the two must be in balance. However, within the last 30 years, due to frequent, terrifying attacks, especially after 9/11, U.S. embassies in many countries across the world have been built to seem more and more like "bunkers," especially in those countries with strong anti-American sentiments.

When America was still a young country, it did not really pay attention to the construction of embassies, usually buying an already existing building in the city's capital. In 1926, the Foreign Service Buildings Office, later renamed the Overseas Building Office, became responsible for designing embassy buildings. In this period, the architectural style of U.S. embassy buildings was mostly in the Classical or Colonial Revival styles. In 1954, in order to give the embassies "a distinguishable American flavor," designs for U.S. embassies used modern architectural styles for the first time. Built in 1959, embassies in Greece and India still exemplify the styles used in this period. Although these two embassies already appear a bit outdated today, during the Cold War era people viewed them as landmark buildings and a symbol of America.

In 1983, The United States Embassy in Lebanon was attacked by a suicide bomber, causing 63 people to die; the American embassy building faced the end of the "age of innocence." This was after the U.S. embassy in Iran was taken over by the Iranian people in 1979, in what was then the deadliest attack on a foreign U.S. embassy. On Nov. 4, 1979, approximately 500 Iranian students attacked and took over the U.S. embassy in Iran's capital city, Tehran. Over 50 American diplomats were held hostage for over 400 days. Since then, Americans have developed a "bunker mentality" toward building embassies. After the attacks on the embassy in Lebanon, the U.S. Department of State founded a diplomatic security group and submitted a report in 1985. According to this report, the U.S. founded the Bureau of Diplomatic Security, which created a series of new guidelines on embassy construction. The new standards stipulated that the embassy needed to be built behind a 9-foot safety wall, lay at least 100 feet from the road and have a maximum window-to-wall ratio of 15 percent. They proposed the embassy area should be 15 acres (approx. 60,000 square meters) or be far from the city center. The report also suggested that 126 diplomatic agencies undergo renovations or be completely rebuilt. However, due to lack of sufficient funding from Congress, ultimately only 15 embassies were updated to the new standards.

In 1998, the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania were simultaneously attacked, leaving 223 people dead. Research revealed that these embassies were both not up to the new standards; for example, the embassy in Tanzania was only 25 feet from the road. Later studies also discovered that 85 percent of U.S. embassy buildings still hadn't met standards. These two attacks in eastern Africa brought America's "bunker mentality" to the next level. Following the attacks, the U.S. Department of State finally received significant funding from Congress. After the 9/11 attack, America's "bunker mentality" reached its peak and embassy construction completely turned toward safety. America once again revised its embassy building standards; the new standards require the embassies to upgrade wall height and contain the 100-foot buffer zone. Because of this, American embassies thoroughly became "bunkers."

The U.S. embassy in Baghdad was built during the height of America's "bunker mentality." After the capture of Baghdad by American soldiers, with the frequent sound of explosions from suicide bombers and vehicles going off, the U.S. decided to make the embassy building in Baghdad the safest possible fortress. Construction started on the U.S. embassy in Baghdad in 2005; the building was opened in 2009. The building is located in Baghdad's Green Zone (Safety Zone) with a size comparable to the Vatican City in Rome, surrounded by nine-foot-high safety walls. Costing $736 million to build, the embassy lies 2.5 times farther back in the buffer area than the typical standard. Inside the embassy are hundreds of embassy employees and Marines; it also has an independent water and electricity system. Some refer to the embassy as the "Fortress America" on the Euphrates River.

In the last two years, following a positive turn toward global safety, some Americans began to criticize America's "bunker mentality." In 2010, the U.S. State Department made adjustments to embassy standards, hoping to improve U.S. embassies aesthetically as well as make them more humanized and environmentally friendly. America's "bunker mentality" slowed down.

Last week's attacks perhaps renewed America's "bunker mentality." Some people believe a main reason why the U.S. ambassador in Libya was killed during the attack is because the embassy there was a temporary structure, with no protection or safety provided by the Marine Corps, bulletproof glass or reinforced doors. Perhaps America will again create "Fortress America" embassies around the world, especially if they face another wave of American opposition.


评论:美国的“地堡心态”
来源:天津网 关键字:地堡;美国使馆;美国国务院;1983年;美国大使馆 作者:喻满意 2012-09-20 09:47
  天津网讯 每日新报评论员 喻满意 在“阿拉伯春天”之后,随着中东“独裁者”一个接一个倒台,美国人或许天真地认为,世界变得更加安全了。然而上周发生的事件给他们上了一课:愤怒的民众围攻了美国驻埃及、利比亚、也门、突尼斯等二十多个国家的使馆,美国驻利比亚大使和三名工作人员在袭击中丧生。美国人或许天真但并不是傻子,他们应该明白并不是谁都喜欢他们。

  美国使馆遭袭这已经不是第一次了。实际上,从上世纪80年代开始,美国驻外使馆就没有安生过。一个国家的使馆往往要承担两项任务:既要保护自己的外交人员,又要保持亲民形象,代表自己的国家形象。一般而言不能过分偏重某个任务,两者必须达到某种平衡。然而在过去的30多年时间里,由于频频遭受恐怖袭击,特别是“9·11”之后,美国驻世界许多国家的使馆修建得越来越像“地堡”,特别是在那些反美情绪较强的国家。

  美国建国初期并不怎么在意使馆的建筑,通常是在派驻国的首都买现成的建筑。1926年美国成立专门负责使馆建设的外交建筑办公室,后来更名海外建筑办公室。这一时期美国使馆的风格多是古典复兴风格或殖民地复兴风格。1954年,为了给美国使馆以“一种崭新的美国味”,美国使馆设计首次采用了现代建筑风格。如今仍代表这一时期遗风的美国使馆是1959年建成的美国驻希腊使馆和美国驻印度使馆。尽管今天这两座使馆已经显得有点破旧,但是在冷战时期却被认为是里程碑式的建筑,是美国那一时期的象征。

  1983年,美国驻黎巴嫩使馆遭自杀袭击,造成63人死亡,美国使馆建筑相对“纯真的年代”终结。这是美国驻伊朗使馆在1979年被伊朗民众占领之后,美国海外使馆遭受的最致命的袭击。1979年11月4日,大约500名伊朗学生攻占了美国驻伊朗首都德黑兰的大使馆,50多名美国外交官被扣押了400多天。从此,美国人在修建使馆时养成了“地堡心态”。驻黎巴嫩使馆遭袭之后,美国国务院成立了一个外交安全小组,并在1985年出台了一份报告。根据这份报告,美国成立了外交安全局并制定了使馆建设的一系列新指南。新标准规定,使馆必须建造在安全墙之后9英尺之外,使馆离街道至少100英尺远,窗户和墙的最大比例是15%。使馆区的面积建议为15英亩(约6万平方米)或远离市中心。报告还建议对美国126个外交机构驻地进行升级或完全重建,但由于国会不给钱,最终只有15个使馆升级达到了新标准。

  1998年,美国驻肯尼亚和坦桑尼亚的使馆同时遭袭,造成223人死亡。调查发现,上述两个使馆都没有达到新标准,例如坦桑尼亚使馆离大街只有25英尺。后来的调查还发现,85%的美国使馆都没有达标。东非的这两次恐怖袭击进一步加重了美国人的“地堡心态”。恐怖袭击之后,美国国务院终于得到了国会大批拨款。“9·11”恐怖袭击后,美国的“地堡心态”达到了巅峰。美国使馆建设完全向安全倾斜。美国再次修改使馆建设标准。新标准要求美国使馆必须修建高墙和100英尺缓冲带。美国大使馆也因此变成了一个不折不扣的“大地堡”。

  美国驻巴格达使馆是美国“地堡心态”的巅峰之作。美军占领巴格达之后,自杀人弹和自杀汽车的爆炸声此起彼伏,美国决定将驻巴格达使馆打造成最安全的堡垒。美国驻巴格达使馆始建于2005年,2009年开馆。使馆位于巴格达绿区(安全区),大小相当于罗马的梵蒂冈城,周围环绕着9英尺高的防爆墙。使馆建造费用是7.36亿美元,缓冲距离是普通标准的2.5倍。里面有好几百名使馆工作人员和海军陆战队士兵,独立的水电系统。有人将该使馆称为幼发拉底河上的“美国堡垒”。

  近两年,随着国际安全形势的好转,一些美国人对美国的“地堡心态”提出了批评。2010年负责外交的美国国务院对使馆标准进行了调整,希望让美国使馆更加美观、更加人性化,对环境更加友好。美国的“地堡心态”见缓。

  上周的袭馆事件或许让美国的“地堡心态”重新绷紧。有人认为,美国驻利比亚大使在袭击中丧生的原因,主要是那里的使馆只是一个临时机构,既没有海军陆战队提供安全保障,也没有安装防弹玻璃或强化的门。美国或许又打算将“美国堡垒”修遍全球,特别是如果美国再面临新一轮反美浪潮。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Austria: Donald Is Disappointed in Vladimir

Canada: No, the Fed Was Not ‘Independent’ before Trump

Austria: If This Is Madness, There is a Method to It

Germany: Donald Trump’s Failure

Germany: It’s Not Europe’s Fault

Topics

Austria: Donald Is Disappointed in Vladimir

Austria: If This Is Madness, There is a Method to It

Germany: It’s Not Europe’s Fault

Germany: Donald Trump’s Failure

Canada: No, the Fed Was Not ‘Independent’ before Trump

Spain: State Capitalism in the US

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Related Articles

Germany: It’s Not Europe’s Fault

Spain: State Capitalism in the US

Thailand: Appeasing China Won’t Help Counter Trump

India: Will New US Envoy Help to Repair Ties under Threat?

France: Global South: Trump Is Playing into China’s Hands