No matter who wins, we, as a nation, lose was the slogan of an American party about 40 years ago. Seven weeks earlier, after the first days of the financial crisis, perhaps the 40 million stock exchange participants in USA, the same ones who were faced with loss, also the other million people who suddenly saw their retirement saving accounts being ripped off would have been ready to share their Marxist co nationals skepticism the American dream went into a coma.
For decades, houses havent been considered cheap in America, but at the same time not so hard to pay for, especially for the two million debtors who, by the end of 2009, are expected to hand over their homes to the banks, which will have no one to resell them to, anyway. However, all the other things food, gas, school taxes and the price of medical services are going up. Where can you cut down on expenses ask the same people who no longer save up or those who have an average debt of over 8000 dollars on their credit card. Hence, where can you take more from ask the people who already work 12 hours a day and only sleep four hours a night
Perhaps for the first time in the history of The Land of Opportunities, the American dream has been snatched from the people, who are left to feel the desperation of not being able to help their own situations. And maybe they dont even have anyone to blame, as those who obstructed the financial system, the bankers on Wall Street, left the scene with millions of dollars worth of bonuses and all that, until now at least, without the FBI ever cornering any of them, not even to give the American people a symbolic satisfaction.
The new President would feel the uneasiness of his fellow citizens ("At the pace things are going right now youre going to have to ask whether youre better off than you were four weeks ago!" asked Obama at a rally). By promising the redistribution of the nations wealth and with all the derogatory tagging applied to him by his republican rival, Obama won the elections.
That happened not because Americans became socialists, but because they still believe they can get rich on their own, provided they are let to do so. Apart from having a nationally financed health insurance system (an idea more and more attractive for the people there), as they do in Canada and EU state members, Americans want very little from the state. But what they undoubtedly want is the belief Obama promised, yes, we can.
Though it may be hard for Europeans to understand or even for the republican electors who received Obamas victory with whispers such as watch your wallets, including most Americans who expect Obama to raise taxes, he was still the chosen one. Maybe the Americans are not so afraid of higher taxes, but of taxes with no gain. In this context, America needs more hundreds of billions for maintaining the infrastructure, more than the 50 Obama reserved for an infrastructure reinvestment bank. After the 700 billion dollars put aside for the rescue of the financial system, the United States real economy is also in urgent need of a salvation plan.
The Bush administration spent hundreds of billions on wars in Afghanistan and Irak. However, even though it managed to get its hands on the Iraqi petrol, the gas price continued to rise in America. The money spent on exporting democracy into the world (whether through bombs or propaganda) would have been just a small part of the entire cost, but definitely a necessary part for fixing the 182.726 unsafe bridges in America (31.4% of the total).
The speed and weight restrictions imposed to American trucks are one more loss for the American contractors, to which are added the price of gas, high cost on credits, Chinese competition etc. All this adds up as if to make it even harder to pay the bills, and any cut on them would give the impression that yes, we can, the American dream is at least on the operating table of a good surgeon Barack Obama. But before giving America back its fame and before taking action for saving global economy, the new president should begin by stimulating the internal consumption, because, in the end, there is something else that depends on the Americans consumption (that ignorant and arrogant always mocked by the other nations of the world): the life of EU industry (USAs largest commercial partner, by the way) and also tens of millions of extremely underpaid (paid, nonetheless) Chinese workers.
Oricine câ?tig? alegerile, poporul american le va pierde, spunea, acum 40 de ani, un slogan al Partidului Socialist al Muncitorilor din SUA. În urm? cu ?apte s?pt?mâni, dup? primele zile de criz? financiar?, poate c? cei 40 de milioane de juc?tori la burs? din SUA care au înregistrat pierderi plus alte milioane care ?i-au v?zut jumulite economiile din fondurile de pensii ar fi fost gata s? împ?rt??easc? scepticismul cona?ionalilor lor marxi?ti visul american intrase în com?.
De decenii, casele nu au mai fost a?a de ieftine în America, dar nici a?a de greu de pl?tit, mai ales pentru cele dou? milioane de debitori care, pân? la sfâr?itul lui 2009, sunt a?tepta?i a-?i preda imobilele b?ncilor, care ?i a?a nu vor avea cui s? le revând?.
În schimb toate celelalte mâncarea, gazele, benzina, taxele ?colare ?i costurile serviciilor medicale sunt în cre?tere. De unde s? mai tai cheltuielile? pentru cei care oricum nu mai pun niciun dolar deoparte sau au datorii medii de pân? la 8.000 dolari pentru cardurile de credit... Ori de unde s? tragi mai mult? pentru cei care deja muncesc 12 ore pe zi ?i dorm câte patru ore pe noapte?
Poate pentru prima dat? în istoria ??rii oportunit??ilor, visul american a fost smuls din mâinile americanilor, l?sa?i s? simt? disperarea c? nu mai au ce s? fac? ei în?i?i pentru a le fi mai bine. ?i poate nici pe cine s? dea vina, pentru c? cei care au înfundat sistemul financiar, bancherii de pe Wall Street, au ie?it din scen? cu bonusuri de sute de milioane dolari ?i, cel pu?in deocamdat?, f?r? ca FBI-ul s?-l fi încol?it m?car pe vreunul, fie ?i pentru a le da o satisfac?ie simbolic? americanilor.
Noul pre?edinte ales al SUA avea s? simt? nelini?tea milioanelor de concet??eni (Nu se mai pune problema s? v? întreba?i dac? v? e mai r?u decât în urm? cu patru ani, ci dac? v? e mai r?u decât în urm? cu patru s?pt?mâni, spunea la o reuniune electoral?), promi?ând redistribuirea averii Americii. Cu toat? eticheta derogatorie de socialist, care i-a fost aplicat? de rivalul republican, Obama a câ?tigat alegerile.
Îns? probabil c? a f?cut-o nu pentru c? americanii ar fi devenit ei în?i?i sociali?ti, ci pentru c? mai cred c? se pot îmbog??i singuri, dac? sunt l?sa?i. În afara unui sistem de asigur?ri de s?n?tate finan?ate de stat (dup? model canadian ?i al statelor UE), o ideee ce devine tot mai popular? în SUA, prea pu?ine lucruri vor americanii din partea statului. Dar ceea ce negre?it vor este s? mai capete convingerea promis? de Obama, da, putem.
În mod greu de în?eles pentru europeni sau chiar pentru aleg?torii republicani care au primit alegerea lui Obama ?u?otind între ei ave?i grij? la portofele (de teama cre?terilor de taxe, indus? de McCain), inclusiv majoritatea americanilor care se a?teapt? ca Obama s? creasc? taxele l-au votat tot pe el. Poate c? americanii nu se tem într-atât de taxe mai mari, ci de taxe de pe urma c?rora nu se aleg cu nimic.
Or, în acest sens, America are o nevoie de mult mai multe sute de miliarde pentru între?inerea infrastructurii decât cele 50 pe care Obama le-a rezervat în programul s?u economic unei b?nci de investi?ii în infrastructur?. Dup? cele 700 de miliarde puse deoparte pentru salvarea sistemului financiar, ?i economia real? a SUA are nevoie urgent? de un plan de salvare.
Administra?ia Bush a cheltuit sute de miliarde pe r?zboaiele din Afganistan ?i Irak, îns?, de?i a pus mâna pe petrolul irakian, pre?ul benzinei a continuat s? creasc? în America. Banii cheltui?i cu exportarea democra?iei în lume (fie prin bombe, fie prin propagand?) ar fi însemnat doar o p?rticic? din întregul cost, îns? cu siguran?? una necesar? pentru repararea celor 182.726 de poduri nesigure din America (31,4% din total).
Restric?iile de vitez? ?i de greutate impuse camioanelor americane sunt o pierdere suplimentar? pus? pe umerii antreprenorilor americani, la care se adaug? pre?ul la combustibil, costul ridicat al creditelor, concuren?a chinez? etc.
Toate se adaug? pentru a face tot mai greu de acoperit notele de plat?, iar orice reducere a acestora ar putea oferi impresia c? da, putem, adic? visul american se afl? m?car pe masa de opera?ie a unui chirurg bun Barack Obama. Iar înainte de a reda prestigiul Americii, de a face ceva pentru a salva economia global?, noul pre?edinte trebuie s? înceap? cu stimularea consumului intern, c?ci, în ultim? instan??, din consumul americanului (ignorantul ?i arogantul acela adesea luat peste picior de celelalte na?iuni ale lumii) tr?iesc ?i întreprinderile din UE (cel mai mare partener comercial al SUA) ?i zeci de milioane de foarte prost pl?ti?i (totu?i pl?ti?i!) muncitori chinezi.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
Time will tell whether the strategic ambitions of the French-German alliance, including those regarding the European army, will jeopardize the EU's cohesiveness, and especially how much longer they can work together within NATO.