The Crisis Might Aggravate China—U.S. Imbalance

Published in Caijing
(China) on 8 December 2008
by Wang Jing (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Ming Li. Edited by Bridgette Blight.
The thought of a stable market and economy by the U.S. government, is to support corporations and individuals to de-leverage with its high rate of leverage, while China continues to finance the U.S. fiscal deficit.

By reporter Wang Jing from Caijing Online

The imbalance of the global economy is regarded as one of the main reasons for the spread of the current economic crisis. Judging from the actions by the Chinese and U.S. governments, at least in the short term, the imbalance between China and the U.S. might become greater.

On Dec. 8, in Caijing’s Macroview Weekly, issue 16, Sheng Minggao, Caijing’s chief economist took apart U.S. policies aiming to stabilize its economy. He judged that the imbalance between China and America will inevitably increase if China continues to finance the U.S. government.

Starting from the key factors of the subprime crisis and its consequences, Sheng analyzed the effects that the actions of the U.S government for a stable market and economy will have.

He thought that the subprime crisis and its consequences resulted from many factors converging at once, among them, high rate of leverage is the key factor to make and quickly aggravate the crisis.

Many financial institutions and investors must de-leverage to save themselves from the financial crisis and this tide of de-leverage further pulls the crisis into an abyss.

The U.S government is the only body able to finance for markets before the markets get confidence back. The introduction of the $700 billion bail-out program, or other bail-out funds the U.S. Treasury Department has paid or committed to pay, or the expected $500 billion bail-out plan by the incoming Obama government that is amid discussion now, are actually government-aided financing to help some financial institutions and corporations lacking credit and financing ability. Or in other words, the government is increasing its own leverage to help the private sector to de-leverage.

Who is going to finance the U.S government? Very likely, China's increasing foreign exchange reserve will be used to acquire American Treasury debt. By this September, China has taken the place of Japan as the US government's no. 1 creditor, totally holding $585 billion of the U.S. treasury bonds. Within 12 months before this, China acquired $117.3 billion of the treasury bonds, 11.5 percent of the U.S government’s newly issued treasury bonds and 18.8 percent of the total treasury bonds acquired by overseas investors at the same time.

As long as Chinese foreign exchange reverse continues to grow, no way to shun the acquirement as the U.S. treasury bonds is still a "safer" investment than others. The amount of U.S. treasury bonds acquired by China increased monthly from July to September, the September increment even larger than the growth of the reserve, are evidences that Chinese government is possibly restructuring its foreign exchange reserve.

Now the pattern is, the leverage of the U.S. economy may lower a bit, but the U.S. government’s deficit will boost a lot, and China will continue to finance the deficit. Judging from this, in the crisis, the imbalance between China and America shows no trend of improving but a trend of worsening. China, as the bearer of the U.S. treasury bonds, will have to bear the risks of dollar devaluation and liquidity trouble of the treasury bonds, if the Federal Reserve runs its money printing machine on all cylinders.

Meanwhile, to stabilize Chinese economy, the Chinese government has revoked the policies used to correct the trade imbalance, including a full rise in the tax rebate rates for export goods, large-scale interest-rate cuts, investment growth and the possible RMB depreciation. While the revocation might help ease pressure on Chinese exporters for a short term, it could result in a situation in which the already big trade surplus and foreign exchange reserve keep going up, then further the imbalance between China and outside economies.

If the U.S economy touches bottom and gets revived soon, its future demand growth will give a strong hand to China’s exporters and Chinese export-oriented economy might go to a turning point. Otherwise, a big test will lay ahead in the way China pursues a stable economic growth, if it turns out to be the U.S. economy will take three years or more to come alive, while China has a weak external demand in one hand, and sagged domestic consumption in another. More importantly, the Chinese government will lose its dominance in tackling the crisis, especially the national structural reform, and China’s future growth will turn more vulnerable to external shocks.


沈明高:危机或加剧中美失衡
美国政府稳定市场和经济的思路,就是通过政府的高杠杆率来支持企业和个人的去杠杆化;而与此同时,中国继续为美国财政赤字融资

  【《财经网》专稿/记者 王晶】全球经济失衡被认为是危机爆发乃至蔓延的一个主要原因。然而,从中美两国政府各自应对危机的举措看,至少在短期,中美之间的失衡不但没有缓解,反而有可能加剧。
  在《财经》研究部12月8日推出的第十六期《财经•宏观周报》中,《财经》首席经济学家沈明高就美国政府维稳经济的政策影响进行剖析。他认为,如果中国继续为美国政府融资,将不可避免地加剧中美失衡。
  沈明高从美国次贷危机以及后续发展的关键因素入手,分析美国政府稳定市场和经济的举措将带来何种影响。
  他认为,美国次贷危机及其后续发展,是多重因素在同一个时间点共同作用的结果。其中,高杠杆率是危机形成并迅速恶化的关键因素。
  为了在危机中自保,很多金融机构和投资者不得不去杠杆化,这一浪潮把美国的金融危机进一步推向了深渊。
  在市场信心恢复之前,美国政府是惟一能够有效通过市场融资的机构。无论从目前已经出台的7000亿美元救市计划,还是其他美国财政部已经承诺或支付上万元的救助资金,或者正在讨论中的奥巴马新政府可能出台的5000亿美元救经济计划,其实质就是,政府帮助已经丧失信用和融资能力的金融机构和其他企业融资,或者说,是通过政府高杠杆率的方式帮助企业去杠杆化。
  那么,谁为美国政府融资呢?中国持续增长的外汇储备很可能被动地增持美国国债。到今年9月,中国共持有美国国债5850亿美元,已经取代日本成为美国国债的最大外国投资者。在这之前的12个月之内,中国增持1173亿美元美国国债,相当于美国同期增发国债的11.5%,也相当于同期外国持有者增持美国国债的18.8%。
  只要中国外汇储备继续增长,增持美国国债就不可避免。这是因为,美国国债与其他投资品种相比,仍是比较“安全”的投资品种。在今年7月-9月,中国持有美国国债的增量逐月递增,9月的增持水平甚至超出了当月外汇储备的增量,显示中国政府可能在逐步调整外汇储备资产的结构。
  现在的基本格局是,美国经济总体的杠杆率或许有所下降,但美国政府的财政赤字将大幅度提高,中国继续为美国财政赤字融资。从这个角度看,在危机中,中美两国的失衡不但没有改善,反而有加剧的趋势。在美联储全力开动印钞机的情况下,中国持有美国国债将不得不承担未来美元贬值和美国国债的流动性风险。
  与此同时,为了稳定经济,中国政府的政策在前两年为平衡贸易而进行改革的基础上全面后退,包括全面提高出口退税水平、大幅度减息、增加投资和可能的人民币贬值。政策后退的结果或许有助于在短期内为出口企业纾困,稳定出口企业的就业,但却有可能保持外贸顺差和外汇储备的继续较快增长,导致中国与外部经济更多的失衡。
  如果美国经济能够在短期之内见底并复苏,未来需求的增长对中国出口有较大的支持,中国外向型经济或许会现转机。但如果美国经济复苏需要三年甚至更长的时间,外需持续疲弱,而国内消费又没有得到提振,中国经济的稳定增长将面临巨大的考验。更为重要的是,中国政府将失去应对危机特别是国内结构调整的主导权,未来经济增长在面对外部冲击时显得更加脆弱。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Pakistan: Israel Bent on Sabotaging Trump’s Gaza Peace Plan

Australia: Breaking China’s Iron Grip on World’s Supply of Critical Minerals

Sri Lanka: The Palestinian Story Outshines Flattery and Triumphalism

Australia: Trump Seems Relaxed about Taiwan and Analysts Are Concerned

Switzerland: Don’t Give Trump the Nobel Peace Prize Now!

Topics

Canada: Canada Has a Better Model for Cutting Government than Trump’s Shutdown Theatrics

Australia: Trump Seems Relaxed about Taiwan and Analysts Are Concerned

Australia: Breaking China’s Iron Grip on World’s Supply of Critical Minerals

Hong Kong: Trump’s Obsession with the Nobel Peace Prize Is a Farce

India: The World after the American Order

India: The Real Question behind the US-China Rivalry

Pakistan: No Coalition for Reason

Related Articles

Australia: Trump Seems Relaxed about Taiwan and Analysts Are Concerned

Australia: Breaking China’s Iron Grip on World’s Supply of Critical Minerals

India: The World after the American Order

India: The Real Question behind the US-China Rivalry

Pakistan: The Beginning of the 2nd Cold War