Iraq Withdrawal Endangered

Published in Frankfurter Rundschau
(Germany) on 26 April 2009
by Andreas Schwarzkopf (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Ron Argentati. Edited by Katy Burtner.
Since the recent devastating suicide attacks in Iraq, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s comments are beginning to sound like rallying cries. During her visit to Iraq, she assured the country of America’s unwavering support – even in the worst of times – but nonetheless is sticking to America’s strategy of responsible withdrawal. What else could she say?

The bottom line is that her boss, President Barack Obama, promised the war-weary American people during his campaign that the troops would be brought home. Keeping that promise is proving to be more difficult and not as quickly accomplished as planned. The attacks were the bloodiest in nearly a year and are seen as the opening shot in a new season of violence. The causes of the violence are the as yet unsolved problems of rebuilding the nation, the ever-increasing disagreements over the sharing of oil reserves and the absence of a national reconciliation process.

All this will tie the United States military down in Iraq longer than U.S. planners had thought. That, in turn, endangers America’s new Afghanistan-Pakistan strategy where the United States hopes a troop surge will pacify the situation. The outlook isn’t bright for anyone.


Gefährdeter Rückzug
VON ANDREAS SCHWARZKOPF

Nach den jüngsten verheerenden Anschlägen im Irak klingen die Worte von Außenministerin Hillary Clinton bereits wie Durchhalteparolen. Sie sicherte dem Land während ihres Besuchs die uneingeschränkte Unterstützung zu - auch in schwierigen Zeiten, halte aber an der verantwortungsvollen Rückzugs-Strategie fest. Was soll sie auch sagen.

Schließlich hat ihr Chef und Präsident Barack Obama seinen kriegsmüden Landsleuten versprochen, die Truppen heimzuholen. Dass dies nicht so einfach und nicht so schnell geht, wie angekündigt, zeichnet sich ab. Die Attentate waren die blutigsten seit einem Jahr und gelten als Auftakt zu einer Gewalt-Serie. Ursache sind die ungelösten Probleme beim Staatsaufbau, der weiter schwelende Konflikt um die Verteilung des Öl-Reichtums und der ausgebliebene Versöhnungsprozess.

All das wird das US-Militär stärker im Zweistromland binden, als die US-Planer sich das denken. Das könnte die Strategie für Afghanistan-Pakistan gefährden, wo die USA mit mehr Soldaten für Ruhe sorgen wollen. Keine guten Aussichten für niemand.

This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Taiwan: Is Being Too Pro-American in Taiwan’s Interests?

Poland: Europe Must Not Get Drawn into a War with Iran*

Israel: Put an End to the Threats from Iran and Hezbollah

Australia: Houthis Open Up New Front in Middle East War, Making Things Much More Complex for Trump

Germany: Donald Trump’s Defeat in the Iran War

Topics

Poland: Peace Is 1 of the Versions: New Elements of War with Iran

Saudi Arabia: US and Europe: A Partnership of Anxiety

Israel: Put an End to the Threats from Iran and Hezbollah

Saudi Arabia: A Forward-Looking Vision for the Region and World After This War

Poland: Europe Must Not Get Drawn into a War with Iran*

Germany: Trump Is Already Halfway Gone from NATO

Venezuela: A Transition to What?

Belgium: Trump: The EV’s Unlikely Top Ambassador

Related Articles

Germany: Europe Must Not Allow Itself To Be Drawn into Trump’s War

Germany: Friedrich Merz Bids Farewell to International Law

Saudi Arabia: Washington and Europe… A Rupture Confirmed by War

Germany: Trump’s Greenland Threats: The EU Must Defend Itself!

Germany: The Epstein Curse Continues To Loom Large