Why Him? Why Now?

Published in Le Temps
(Switzerland) on 9 October 2009
by Jean-Claude Péclet (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Louis Standish. Edited by Christie Chu.
Why him? Or rather, why at this point in time? The history of the Nobel Peace Prize is littered with questionable decisions, but this is going to be one of the most controversial. Worst, it risks being counter-productive.

In spite of the goodwill that Barack Obama inspires in the world, the fact is that nothing has yet come of it. Certainly, the election of the first black American president was a magnificent symbol - but in that case, it's the American people who must make peace. Without a doubt, Barack Obama's speeches are polished and impressive, but there has been no action, much less any outcome of those actions.

If we observe the foreign policy of the president - at least what has been seen up until now - there isn't enough to check off on the balance sheet. We first see a man very much bogged down on the two most pressing issues of the moment: the Middle East and Afghanistan. In the first case, Barack Obama has been blown off by the Israelis at the end of September and is at the moment looking for a way to start up again.

If we observe his domestic policy, we see some issues such as health care and climate change that, for now, are on the back burner while Wall Street goes back to its old ways. In addition, the American economy has not improved, the unemployment rate is approaching 10 percent and the value of the dollar is falling. All this creates a tense political environment.

With these conditions, the Nobel Peace Prize risks fanning tensions more than calming them. We already see the attacks that will come out on the neoconservative radio and television shows. Paradoxically, this prize might celebrate a "uniter," but it's probably going to be polarizing.

It will be heavy to carry for the interested party. It isn't easy being the leader of the world's only superpower, currently the focal point of immense hopes that may only lead to disappointment, and hindered on every part by a very restrained political system. The sanctification by the Nobel Prize doesn't help matters at all.


Pourquoi lui? Ou plutôt, pourquoi maintenant déjà? L’histoire des Prix Nobel de la paix est semée de décisions critiquées, mais celle-ci va être une des plus controversées. Pire, elle risque d’être contre-productive.

Malgré la sympathie qu’inspire Barack Obama dans le monde, le fait est qu’il n’a encore rien prouvé. Certes, l’élection du premier président américain noir fut un symbole magnifique – mais dans ce cas, c’est au peuple américain qu’il fallait donner le prix. Sans doute, les discours de Barack Obama sont ciselés et impressionnants, mais ce ne sont pas encore des actes, encore moins la conséquence de ces actes.

Si on observe la politique étrangère du président – du moins ce qu’on en a vu jusqu’ici, qui ne suffit pas à tirer quelque bilan que ce soit – on voit d’abord un homme très emprunté sur les deux dossiers les plus brûlants du moment: le Proche-Orient et l’Afghanistan. Dans le premier cas, Barack Obama s’est fait moucher par les Israéliens à fin septembre et cherche pour l’instant une façon de rebondir. Dans le second, il consulte sur l’avenir d’une force internationale qui n’arrive plus à juguler les rebelles et cautionne un régime corrompu.

Si on observe sa politique intérieure, on voit des chantiers (santé, climat) qui, pour l’instant, prennent du retard tandis que, si Wall Street reprend des couleurs, le dollar chute et l’économie réelle des Etats-Unis ne se porte pas mieux qu’il y a un an, avec un chômage approchant les 10%.

Il en résulte un climat politique tendu. Les attaques ont gagné en violence cet été et ne diminuent pas d’intensité. Dans ces conditions, le Nobel de la paix risque d’attiser les tensions plus qu’il ne les calmera. On entend déjà l’usage qu’en feront les télévisions et radios néo-conservatrices. Paradoxalement, ce prix qui doit célébrer un rassembleur,va probablement polariser.

Il sera lourd à porter pour le principal intéressé. Ce n’est déjà pas facile d’être le dirigeant de la première puissance mondiale, à la fois point focal d’espoirs immenses qui ne peuvent être qu’en partie déçus, et entravé de toutes parts par un système politique très contraignant. La sanctification par le Nobel n’arrange rien à l’affaire.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Spain: Global Aid without the US

Nigeria: The Global Fallout of Trump’s Travel Bans

Palestine: Ceasefire Not Peace: How Netanyahu and AIPAC Outsourced Israel’s War to Trump

United Kingdom: Trump Is Angry with a World That Won’t Give Him Easy Deals

Nepal: The Battle against American Establishment

Topics

Poland: Jędrzej Bielecki: Trump’s Pyrrhic Victory*

Austria: Trump Is Only Part of the Problem

Canada: Canada Must Match the Tax Incentives in Trump’s ‘Big Beautiful Bill’

Germany: Big Tech Wants a Say in EU Law: More Might for the Mighty

Germany: Trump’s Disappointment Will Have No Adverse Consequences for Putin*

             

Spain: Global Aid without the US

Spain: Not a Good Time for Solidarity

Related Articles

Switzerland: When Elon Musk Highlights Donald Trump’s Limits – And His Own

Switzerland: Donald Trump: 100 Days Already, but How Many Years?

Switzerland: According to Donald Trump, the Trade War Will Only Create Losers

Switzerland: Trump and Putin, the Same Religion?

Switzerland: Emperor Donald Trump Put to the Test by Russia