Obama’s Nobel

Published in Togo
(Togo) on 11 October 2009
by Koffi Souza (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Merl Storr. Edited by Christie Chu.
Controversy continues to rage over the award of the Nobel Peace Prize to President Barack Obama. What seems surprising is that it’s the Americans themselves – the very people we might have expected to be proud of such an honor – who are the most taken aback by it. The Washington Post expresses Americans’ general surprise that the Nobel Peace Prize should be awarded to “a president still in his first year in office with no major accomplishments internationally.”

The New York Times described the award as a “mixed blessing” which highlights “the gap between the ambitious promise of his words and his accomplishments.”

On the other hand, reactions outside the U.S. have been more positive. The Nobel Committee points out that the prize has been awarded to Obama "for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and co-operation between peoples." World opinion agrees with The Asian Age that it is “a prize which gives hope to the world.”*

Such divided reactions are understandable. American opinion demands concrete results which will take some time to materialize. International opinion, on the other hand, is full of hope. Opinion of the world’s greatest superpower was negative during the Bush era. Now Obama is reconciling the world with the United States.

A great hope has been born. It must not be disappointed.


*Translator’s note: The Asian Age headline actually called the award “a prize for giving hope to the world”.


L’attribution du prix Nobel de la paix au président Barack Obama n’en finit pas de déclencher la controverse. Ce qui parait surprenant c’est que les Américains qui devraient eux- mêmes êtres fiers de cette distinction sont les premiers à s’étonner.Le Washington Post évoque la surprise générale que le Nobel de la Paix soit décerné «à un président qui n'a pas achevé sa première année de mandat et n'a obtenu aucun résultat majeur sur le plan international.
Pour le New York Times, il s'agit d'une «reconnaissance mitigée», qui souligne «le fossé entre les ambitieuses promesses verbales et leur réalisation».

En revanche, à l’étranger, les réactions sont plus positives. Le comité Nobel souligne que le prix a été attribué à Barack Obama «pour ses efforts extraordinaires en vue de renforcer la diplomatie internationale et la coopération entre les peuples».L’opinion mondiale partage quant à elle l’idée qu’il s’agit d’ «Un prix qui donne de l'espoir au monde» (The Asian Age).

On comprend ces réactions contrastées. L’opinion américaine attend des résultats concrets qui demanderont du temps avant de se manifester. L’opinion internationale est au contraire pleine d’espoir. A l’époque de Bush elle avait une opinion négative de la première puissance mondiale.Et voici qu’Obama réconcilie le monde avec les Etats-Unis.

Une grande espérance est née. Elle demandera à ne pas être déçue.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Austria: The FPÖ Is a Means to an End for Trump

Spain: Trump’s Anti-Europe Doctrine

Japan: National Guard Shooting in US Capital: Misguided Incitement of Anti-Foreign Doctrine

Philippines: Trump Wants To Make Europe White Again

Topics

Japan: US National Security Strategy: New Concerns about Isolationism

Spain: Trump’s Anti-Europe Doctrine

El Salvador: A Pardon with Geopolitical Significance: Trump, Hernández and the Honduran Right Wing

Spain: A Warning That’s Impossible To Ignore

Germany: One Should Take It as an Honor

Ireland: Trump’s Disturbing National Security Strategy Should Be Required Reading

Saudi Arabia: Pro-Israel Influences Targeting US Churches

Related Articles

Togo: Togo-USA: The Path to Democracy

Togo: Africa and the USA: A Honeymoon

Togo: Obama and the Two Slaveries