America Fights While China Builds

Published in Wen wei po
(Hong Kong) on 23 December 2009
by He Liangliang (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by John Yu. Edited by Catherine Harrington.
One nation is fighting battles while the other is building new constructions. That is an accurate description of the U.S. and China, currently the two greatest outside influences on Afghanistan. But while combined U.S. and NATO forces now total over 150,000, defeat of the Taliban is still nowhere in sight due to the complexity of this militant organization.
 
China borders Afghanistan but has not participated in the conflict, choosing instead to gradually develop an advantage through trade and economic involvement. According to reports, China is focusing on trade and investment rather than providing financial aid at the national level. In April 2009, it poured in the largest foreign investment to date with the China Metallurgical Construction Company’s US$3.5 billion purchase of Aynak, the world’s second largest copper mine. The mine is located 50 kilometers south of Kabul in the Logar province, an area still largely controlled by the Taliban, and is being protected by U.S. and NATO forces. In addition to building new schools, homes and hospitals, this investment will help economic development and increase employment by creating 8,000 jobs, a 400-megawatt power plant, a copper smelting plant and a railroad connecting to Tajikistan. In the past, unemployment among young people has been responsible for the Taliban’s growing ranks, but if the group persists in interfering with modernization, they will end up losing control rather than benefiting the nation as a whole.
 
Chinese businesses are also being opened in Kabul. They provide residents with necessary commodities and will be an important part of national reconstruction, as Afghanistan needs household goods in addition to large-scale constructions. Fortunately, Chinese products are economical and convenient to transport.
 
In truth, American and Chinese efforts in Afghanistan are complementary because fighting a war without developing infrastructure won’t solve Afghanistan’s problems. At the same time, on-going construction projects cannot be completed without the necessary protection. So from this perspective, America and China are both playing their roles to help Afghanistan.


美國在阿富汗打仗(剿匪),中國在阿富汗建設,這就是當前在阿富汗影響最大的兩個國家的寫照。美國和北約在阿富汗的駐軍將達到15萬之眾,何時能夠剿滅塔利班,還遙遙無期,因為塔利班不是一個簡單的武裝集團。
 中國是阿富汗的鄰國,但是沒有介入阿富汗的戰爭,而是在經濟建設和貿易方面發揮了自己優勢,穩步推 進。據報道,中國不把重點放在由國家提供財政援助之上,而是更為重視貿易和投資。2009年4月,中國對阿富汗作出該國前所未有的最大外國投資。中國冶金 建設集團公司以35億美元購買了艾娜克銅礦,該礦是世界第二大銅礦,位於喀布爾以南50公里的盧格爾省境內,該省大部分地區在塔利班控制之下,美軍和北約 在保護中國投資的艾娜克銅礦的建設。中國在那裡的投資,不僅將創造八千個就業崗位,而且將建造一個四百兆瓦的發電廠和一個銅熔煉廠,鋪設一條直至塔吉克斯 坦邊境的鐵路。此外,還要興建學校、住宅和醫院。這樣的投資和建設,有利於阿富汗經濟發展,增加民眾就業,許多青年正是因為失業而投入塔利班的。塔利班如 果堅持破壞各種現代化建設,並不能給阿富汗帶來好處,最終也將失去對各地的控制。
 中國民間商人也在首都和各地開設商店,為阿富汗民眾提供各種適合他們的商品,這其實也是未來阿富汗重建的重要內容,阿富汗需要大型工程,也需要各種日用商品,而中國提供的商品價廉物美,且距離較近,運輸方便。
 美國和中國在阿富汗的作用是互補的,只打仗不建設,不可能解決阿富汗問題;工程項目得不到保護,也無法完成。從這個角度來看,兩個大國在分別扮演自己的角色,殊途同歸共同幫助阿富汗。

This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Mexico: Qatar, Trump and Venezuela

South Korea: Trump Halts Military Aid to Taiwan, and It Concerns Us, Too

Malaysia: A Major Breakthrough of US and EU on Ukraine or Mere Rant? ASEAN Taking Notes

Singapore: TikTok Deal Would Be a Major Win for Trump, but Not in the Way You Might Expect

Topics

Malaysia: A Major Breakthrough of US and EU on Ukraine or Mere Rant? ASEAN Taking Notes

South Korea: Trump Halts Military Aid to Taiwan, and It Concerns Us, Too

Japan: ‘Department of War’ Renaming: The Repulsiveness of a Belligerent Attitude

Turkey: Will the US Be a Liberal Country Again?

Singapore: TikTok Deal Would Be a Major Win for Trump, but Not in the Way You Might Expect

Pakistan: US Debt and Global Economy

Mexico: Qatar, Trump and Venezuela

Related Articles

Hong Kong: Foreign Media Warn US Brand Reputation Veering toward ‘Collapse’ under Trump Policy Impact

Hong Kong: The Lessons of World War II: The Real World Importance of Resisting Hegemony

Hong Kong: Can US Tariffs Targeting Hong Kong’s ‘Very Survival’ Really Choke the Life out of It?

Hong Kong: What Makes US Trade War More Dangerous than 2008 Crisis: Trump

Hong Kong: China, Japan, South Korea Pave Way for Summit Talks; Liu Teng-Chung: Responding to Trump