Is Google Doing Business or Engaging in Politics?

Published in Nanfang Daily
(China) on 16 January 2010
by Jin Canrong (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Eugene Tan. Edited by Brigid Burt.
Google is an Internet company with a great reputation, a large organization and a business model that has achieved worldwide success. But its current situation truly leaves people baffled. Google has presented China with a political challenge, and this is a type of situation that most large companies try their best to avoid.

In the past few days, Google has threatened to leave the Chinese market — a move that the Western media has praised and used as a good opportunity to criticize China. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has stood up to criticize China, and members of Congress have voiced even harsher opinions. In this incident, Google has been at the center of the storm, and its role is obviously changing.

Initially, Google’s complaint was that its server was being “attacked.” Later, this complaint surprisingly turned into a request for China to stop its Internet censorship. From the common problem of Internet security, Google has jumped to demanding that China change its laws — an act that has truly confused the Chinese people.

Is Google doing business or engaging in politics? If it’s business, then Google should stay within the confines of the business world. If there is a dispute, there is no need to worry; all problems can be solved through business channels. But if Google is trying to influence Chinese politics and social reform, then that completely changes the circumstances of this situation.

Currently, there is controversy regarding China’s management of Internet access, but any changes must be in full accord with China’s current situation and must consider Chinese society’s tolerance for change as the basic standard for making a decision.

Contemporary Chinese society is already considerably open-minded, and the growth of the Internet is constantly driving Chinese society forward. China will inevitably be more and more open in the future. However, there is a limit to the speed with which the process of change occurs. This won’t happen overnight. How wide should China open its doors? How should China pave its path forward? These steps should be taken and planned by the Chinese people themselves. Opinions of the outside world should only serve as consultation. No matter how advanced its technology is, no matter how abundant its resources are, an Internet company that wants to control a society’s rate of change is certainly just being arrogant.

Google has been doing business in China for more than three years, but it seems that Google still has a very limited understanding of Chinese history and current affairs. China is a sovereign state, not a 19th century settlement. Foreign businesses do not have any extraterritorial rights. Anyone who tries to do business in China outside the confines of the law is certainly misunderstanding 21st century China. The constructive criticism and well-intentioned advice of Western society and multinational corporations will certainly boost China’s development. But concealing political agendas and using threats to force China to give in are out of the question.

Google wants China to abolish Internet censorship. The result of this would be similar to what the U.S. Web site Mashable stated in an article: “To think that China would change its rules and allow its citizens unfiltered access to what it believes is objectionable content (e.g. porn), as well as information and images on its greatest atrocities, is absurd.”

China has always been able to grow amid the criticism of some Westerners, so the further criticism that Google has incited is not a big deal. However, the support of the Western media for Google’s withdrawal from China has made the Chinese people more wary.

U.K.’s The Guardian predicts that if Google wants to have a showdown, the Internet world will be split. China certainly does not want this to happen, but China is also unafraid of any sort of trouble and will not be held hostage by such a possibility. Chinese society must stand united against Google’s threat.

Many Chinese people are willing to use Google’s search engine. Without Google in China, there may be a temporary disruption of Chinese people’s Internet activity. Therefore, we welcome Google to stay, but if Google does stay, it must make some adjustments and adapt to Chinese laws. If Google insists on leaving, it will not be a big deal. Google will just be isolating itself from the Chinese market.


谷歌让人看不懂:做商业,还是搞政治?
2010-01-16 13:41

谷歌是个互联网公司,名气很大,块头更大,其商业模式在世界范围内获得成功。但它现在的架势让人看不懂了。它向中国提出了政治要求,而这种事情通常是大的商业公司极力避免的。

  两天来,谷歌威胁要退出中国市场,一些西方媒体发出赞扬,并迅速把这一事件变成了批判中国的好机会。美国国务卿希拉里站出来指责中国,国会议员发出更加刺耳的声音。在这一事件中,谷歌处于风暴的中心,而且它的角色明显在变。

  起先,谷歌抱怨的原因是服务器受到“攻击”,后来,竟演变成要让中国取消“网络审查”。从互联网安全的一个普遍问题,跳到了要要求中国改变法律。这一跳真是让中国人吃惊。

  谷歌究竟是在做商业,还是在搞政治?如果是商业,那就应当限定在商业范畴。有纠纷不要紧,可以通过商业的途径来解决,但要是想通过商业行为来影响中国政治大局和社会改革进程,那可就完全改变了事件的性质。

  当前,中国互联网上的管理有一些争议,但怎么改,要充分尊重中国的现状,也要以中国社会的承受力为基本判断标准。

  中国社会目前已经相当开放,互联网的成长不断激励着它,今后的中国只能更加开放。但是,任何开放都是有度的,而且开放要有一个进程,不可能一蹴而就。中国的门该开多大,路该怎么铺,要中国人自己来设计、安排,外界怎么说,只能作为参考。一个互联网公司,即便拥有最先进的技术,最丰厚的资金,就想左右这一进程,都是狂妄的。

  谷歌在中国经营三年多,但似乎对中国的历史与现实了解的程度还很低。中国是主权国家,不是19世纪时的租界,外国企业没有治外法权。在中国经商,想游离于中国法律之外,是对21世纪中国的误读。西方社会、跨国公司对中国建设性的批评和善意的主张,是有助于中国发展的。但如果背后隐藏政治企图,并想用一种威胁的方式来迫使中国就范,根本行不通。

  谷歌要中国取消网络审查制度,其结果只能像美国“Mashable”网站的一篇文章所说:“如果有人幻想中国会改变政策,让人无限制地接触反动、淫秽图片等内容,那纯粹是无稽之谈。”

  中国这些年一直在西方某些人的鞭笞和叫骂声中成长,谷歌威胁引来更多责难没什么可怕的。倒是这一次西方媒体对谷歌威胁退出一边倒地叫好,让中国民众不能不多一层警惕之心。

  英国《卫报》预测,如果谷歌摊牌,互联网世界将分裂。中国当然不希望这种分裂,但也不怕任何麻烦,更不能被这种预言所挟持。在谷歌威胁面前,中国社会必须要团结。

  许多中国民众都愿意使用谷歌的搜索业务。没有谷歌在中国的业务,可能会暂时影响到一些中国人的网络生活。所以,我们欢迎谷歌留下,但留下来的谷歌必须要做出调整,也要适应中国的法律。如果谷歌坚持要退出,没什么了不起。退出,是自绝于中国市场。

  金灿荣
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Sri Lanka: The Palestinian Story Outshines Flattery and Triumphalism

Pakistan: No Coalition for Reason

Canada: In Hegseth’s War on Journalism, Truth Is the 1st Casualty

Australia: Trump Seems Relaxed about Taiwan and Analysts Are Concerned

Argentina: Power on the World Stage

Topics

Argentina: Power on the World Stage

South Korea: The CIA and Its Covert ‘Regime Change’ Operations

Canada: Donald Trump Isn’t Just Demolishing the East Wing — He’s Marking Territory He Never Plans To Leave

Canada: Canada Has a Better Model for Cutting Government than Trump’s Shutdown Theatrics

Australia: Trump Seems Relaxed about Taiwan and Analysts Are Concerned

Australia: Breaking China’s Iron Grip on World’s Supply of Critical Minerals

Hong Kong: Trump’s Obsession with the Nobel Peace Prize Is a Farce

Related Articles

Australia: Trump Seems Relaxed about Taiwan and Analysts Are Concerned

Australia: Breaking China’s Iron Grip on World’s Supply of Critical Minerals

India: The World after the American Order

India: The Real Question behind the US-China Rivalry

Pakistan: The Beginning of the 2nd Cold War

1 COMMENT

  1. I am an IT professional from China’s mainland. Without Google we can not find what we need. Getting over the Great Firewall is the only option. I don’t trust official media in home. They are all propaganda.

    Google’s share of market in China is growing all the way now to about 35 percent. It’s absolutly not a matter of business but that of a moral courage.

    Over the past years Chinese government has tightened up the control over internet, no matter hard Chinese netizens fought and Google engaged for a freer internet.

    Google alone can’t possibly make any difference but I appreciate what Google has done for us Chinese and I will support its decision. And I hope US government and its multinationals can be vocal on their stand against Chinese government’s control over internet.

    I can’t predict this incident’s outfall but more and more Chinese will learn to use some anti-firewall software to get what they need.