Nuclear Test

Published in Folha Online
(Brazil) on 19 May 2010
by Eliane Cantanhêde (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Haitham Jendoubi. Edited by Harley Jackson.
Although the American ambassador to Brazil, Thomas Shannon, tried to restore calm by denying it, the Iranian issue has provoked an open and direct confrontation between Brasilia and Washington.

Even as President Lula, Chancellor Celso Amorim, and [Foreign Affairs] Advisor Marco Aurélio Garcia try to celebrate the agreement with Iran and Turkey to trade low-enriched uranium for fuel, President Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton are mobilizing the U.N. Security Council to ignore the agreement and impose a new round of sanctions against the Iranian regime.

It’s a moment of high tension. Though the United States has gained the unconditional support of France and Britain, Brazil is still struggling to prevent the other two members of the council from rallying behind sanctions: Russia and China, which are considered by Hillary to be pro-sanctions and by Amorim to be against them. The world waits anxiously for the stance the Russians and Chinese will take: directly, without intermediaries or interpretations.

On top of this lurks a considerable danger: whether Iran will decide to build an atomic bomb. Did you ever imagine that such a thing would fall into the hands of Khamenei and Ahmadinejad? Not only the Middle East, but the whole world would come to incalculable risk.

The Iran-Brazil-Turkey agreement, as Amorim never tires of repeating, was drawn up along the terms that the United States and its followers themselves proposed to the Iranians at the end of last year. At the time, it came to nothing. Now, with Brazilian intervention, there has been an advance.

The problem, as Hillary Clinton says, lies in two questions that are not specified in the terms of the agreement: the ability of the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) to carry out inspections — a fundamental security consideration; and the declaration (or threat?) by an Iranian minister that, with or without the agreement, Iran will continue enriching uranium to 20 percent. In other words, he implicitly bolstered the sense that the agreement is an accessory and does not eliminate the threat of the bomb.

As Ambassador Shannon, who finds himself in the middle of the hurricane, has said, the Brazilian effort has merit, but the result “is not enough” to eliminate doubts and fears.

Brazil has gotten involved out of a desire to occupy a leadership role on the world scene and ended up at odds with the United States. Perhaps the whole idea was to get into a fight with the big boys in order to feel like one of them.




Apesar de o embaixador americano, Thomas Shannon, tentar passar panos quentes e dizer que não, a questão do Irã provocou um confronto direto e aberto entre Brasília e Washington.

Enquanto o presidente Lula, o chanceler Celso Amorim e o assessor Marco Aurélio Garcia tentam comemorar o acordo com o Irã e com a Turquia para a troca de urânio levemente enriquecido por combustível, o presidente Obama e a secretária de Estado, Hillary Clinton, mobilizam o Conselho de Segurança da ONU para ignorar o acordo e impor uma nova rodada de sanções ao regime iraniano.

O momento é de imensa tensão. Se os EUA conseguiram o apoio incondicional de França e Inglaterra, o Brasil ainda se esforça para impedir as sanções acionando os dois outros membros do Conselho: Rússia e China, que são considerados por Hillary como votos pró-sanções e por Amorim como votos contra elas. O mundo aguarda ansiosamente o posicionamento dos russos e chineses, diretamente, sem intermediários e interpretações.

Durma-se com um barulho desses, e em cima de um perigo nada desprezível: a decisão do Irã de construir, ou não, a bomba atômica. Já imaginou um Kamenei e um Ahmadinejad com um artefato desses nas mãos? Não apenas o Oriente Médio, mas todo o mundo estaria numa zona de risco incalculável.

O acordo Irã-Brasil-Turquia, como não cansa de repetir Amorim, foi pautado nos termos que os próprios EUA e seus seguidores propuseram aos iranianos no final do ano passado. Naquele momento, deu em nada. Agora, com a intervenção brasileira, avançou.

O problema, como diz Hillary Clinton, está em duas questões não especificados nos termos do acordo: a possibilidade de inspeções da AIEA (Agência Internacional de Energia Atômica), ponto fundamental de segurança; e a declaração (ameaça?) de um ministro iraniano de que, com acordo ou sem acordo, o Irã continuará enriquecendo urânio a 20%. Ou seja, dando o dito pelo não dito e cristalizando a sensação de que o acordo é acessório, mas não elimina a ameaça de bomba.

Como disse o embaixador Shannon, que está no meio do furacão, o esforço brasileiro tem méritos, mas o resultado "é insuficiente" para eliminar dúvidas e temores.

O Brasil se meteu nessa pela ânsia de ocupar um lugar de liderança no cenário internacional e acabou batendo de frente com os Estados Unidos. Será que o objetivo era brigar com os grandes para se sentir um deles?
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: Trump Declares War on Cities

Venezuela: Charlie Kirk and the 2nd Amendment

Singapore: The Assassination of Charlie Kirk Leaves America at a Turning Point

Turkey: Blood and Fury: Killing of Charlie Kirk, Escalating US Political Violence

Japan: US Signing of Japan Tariffs: Reject Self-Righteousness and Fulfill Agreement

Topics

Mexico: Nostalgia for the Invasions

Malaysia: The Tariff Trap: Why America’s Protectionist Gambit Only Tightens China’s Grip on Global Manufacturing

Singapore: Several US Trade ‘Deals’ Later, There Are Still More Questions than Answers

Venezuela: Charlie Kirk and the 2nd Amendment

Spain: Charlie Kirk and the Awful People Celebrating His Death

Germany: Trump Declares War on Cities

Japan: US Signing of Japan Tariffs: Reject Self-Righteousness and Fulfill Agreement

Russia: Trump the Multipolarist*

Related Articles

Thailand: Brazil and the US: Same Crime, Different Fate

Sri Lanka: Trump Is Very Hard on India and Brazil, but For Very Different Reasons

Colombia: US Warships Near Venezuela: Is Latin America’s Left Facing a Reckoning?

Germany: Learn from Lula