Bloody “Progress”

Published in Neues Deutschland
(Germany) on 2 February 2011
by Olaf Standke (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Ron Argentati. Edited by Sam Carter.
U.S. General David Petraeus claims to have made “enormous progress” over the last months in the Hindu Kush. What does the commander of the international troop contingent in Afghanistan mean by that? The fact that more than 2,400 civilians were killed in 2010, an increase of 20 percent over the prior year and a new record since the start of the war? According to the depressing statistics published by the Afghanistan Rights Organization, there were also 3,270 civilians wounded. According to research carried out by the independent Internet service icasualties.org, more than 10,000 people in Afghanistan were killed in attacks and military skirmishes. 2010 was the deadliest year for the International Security Assistance Force. 711 soldiers, almost 500 of them from the United States, were killed or wounded. In 2008 the number was only about 300.

Although the troop surge ordered by President Barack Obama has raised the number of foreign troops stationed in Afghanistan to 150,000, the lives of the Afghan people — and the war that is being fought for them — have been not been made safer, as the raw data shows. In spite of that, the United States, NATO and the German federal government cannot agree on a cease-fire date and a rapid withdrawal of troops from the country. All indications are that there will be a further escalation of hostilities — and even more civilian victims.



Blutiger »Fortschritt«
Von Olaf Standke
02.02.2011

Enorme Fortschritte« will der US-amerikanische General David Petraeus in den vergangenen Monaten am Hindukusch ausgemacht haben. Was mag der Befehlshaber der internationalen Truppen in Afghanistan damit meinen? Die Tatsache, dass im Jahr 2010 über 2400 Zivilisten getötet wurden, gleich 20 Prozent mehr als im Vorjahr und damit so viele wie noch nie seit Beginn des Krieges? Hinzu kommen 3270 verwundete Zivilisten, so die deprimierende Statistik der afghanischen Bürgerrechtsorganisation ARM. Insgesamt starben laut Recherchen des unabhängigen Internetdienstes icasualties.org im vergangenen Jahr über 10 000 Menschen durch Anschläge und Kämpfe. Und 2010 war auch das bisher verlustreichste Jahr für die ISAF. 711 Soldaten, davon knapp 500 aus den USA, stehen auf der Liste der Gefallenen und Verunglückten. 2008 waren es noch rund 300.

Obwohl nach den von USA-Präsident Barack Obama befohlenen Truppenverstärkungen inzwischen etwa 150 000 ausländische Militärs in Afghanistan stationiert sind, wird das Leben für die afghanische Bevölkerung – und um die soll es ja gehen – nicht sicherer, wie die nackten Zahlen zeigen. Trotzdem können sich USA, NATO und auch die Bundesregierung nicht zu einem Waffenstillstand und schnellstmöglichen Truppenabzug entschließen. Alles spricht vielmehr für eine weitere Intensivierung der Kampfhandlungen – und noch mehr zivile Opfer.

This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Singapore: Trump’s Gaza Peace Plan – Some Cause for Optimism, but Will It Be Enough?

Paraguay: Believing What You’re Told without Knowing If It’s True: The Dangers of Disinformation

Japan: Trump Administration: Absurd Censorship

Russia: Bagram Absurdity*

   

South Korea: Trump’s Mind: What No One Knows

Topics

Turkey: Cost of Trumping in the 21st Century: Tested in Europe, Isolated on Gaza

Austria: The Showdown in Washington Is about More Than the Budget

Singapore: Trump’s Gaza Peace Plan – Some Cause for Optimism, but Will It Be Enough?

Singapore: US Visa Changes Could Spark a Global Talent Shift: Here’s Where Singapore Has an Edge

Thailand: Could Ukraine Actually End Up Winning?

Thailand: Southeast Asia Amid the US-China Rift

Japan: Trump Administration: Absurd Censorship

Related Articles

Germany: Donald Trump vs. James Comey: A Legal Vendetta

Germany: Unfortunately, Reality Comes to Those Who Wait

Germany: A Software for Authoritarian Restructuring

Russia: The Issue of Weapons Has Come to the Forefront*

Germany: Can Donald Trump Be Convinced To Remain Engaged in Europe?