It was June 4, 2009 at the University of Cairo. Barack Obama was there with a message that he had carefully prepared over several months and in which he had pinned their hopes to revisit — in depth and without impositions — the relationship between the West and Islam as it had been during the Bush era. He began his message with a "Salaam aleikum," and the auditorium full of students, teachers and religious officials burst into applause.
He spoke to young people and told them that the U.S. would be on their side in their quest for a better world. He mentioned words like human rights, justice, education and progress.
What Obama and his listeners didn’t know – or maybe what he and some listeners did know? — is that he was lighting the fuse of what is happening today in Egypt and the Arab world: the beginning of what many call a "democratic revolution" in a region of the world that has, until now, been subjected to the stereotype of an alleged iron dilemma between despotism and religious autocracy. Noam Chomsky, among others, pointed out that Obama did the same as always when faced with the events in Egypt: he behaved like an imperialist.
Not true.
That speech has to be reread and the manner in which the events have taken place has to be considered. The president of the world’s most dominant military power and sustained the regime that ruled Egypt in recent decades told some very specific things to his people: "I do have an unyielding belief that all people yearn for certain things: the ability to speak your mind and have a say in how you are governed; confidence in the rule of law and the equal administration of justice; government that is transparent and doesn't steal from the people; the freedom to live as you choose. These are not just American ideas; they are human rights. And that is why we will support them everywhere…And we will welcome all elected, peaceful governments – provided they govern with respect for all their people."
It is likely that things will not go the best for the United States. But Obama’s bravery of planting the seed can’t be disputed.
Fue el 4 de junio de 2009 en la Universidad de El Cairo. Barack Obama llevó allí un mensaje que había preparado cuidadosamente a lo largo de varios meses y en el que tenía cifradas sus esperanzas de replantear en profundidad y sin imposiciones la relación entre Occidente y el Islam tal y como se había dado durante la era Bush. Inició su mensaje con un “Salam aleikum”, y el auditorio colmado de estudiantes, profesores, religiosos y algunos funcionarios estalló en aplausos.
Les habló a los jóvenes y les dijo que EE.UU. estaría de su lado en su afán de un mundo mejor. Mencionó palabras como derechos humanos, justicia, educación y progreso.
Lo que no sabía Obama ni quienes lo escuchaban –¿o acaso sí lo sabían él y algunos de quienes lo escuchaban?– es que se estaba encendiendo en ese momento la mecha de aquello que hoy está ocurriendo en Egipto y el mundo árabe : el inicio de lo que ya muchos llaman “una revolución democrática” en una región del mundo hasta ahora sometida al estereotipo de un supuesto dilema de hierro entre despotismo laico o autocracia religiosa. Noam Chomsky, entre otros, señaló que Obama hizo lo mismo de siempre frente a los sucesos egipcios: comportarse como un imperialista.
No es cierto.
Hay que releer ese discurso y observar de qué modo se fueron dando los acontecimientos. El presidente de la principal potencia militar del mundo y sustento del régimen que gobernó a Egipto en las últimas décadas les decía algunas cosas bien concretas a sus habitantes: “Tengo una convicción inquebrantable en que todas las personas anhelan ciertas cosas: la posibilidad de expresarse libremente y tener voz y voto en la forma de gobierno; la confianza en el estado de derecho e imparcialidad de la justicia; un gobierno transparente que no le robe a su gente; la libertad de vivir según escoja cada uno. Éstas no son solo ideas estadounidenses, son derechos humanos, y es por eso que nosotros los apoyaremos en todas partes (...). Y acogeremos a todos los gobiernos electos y pacíficos, siempre que gobiernen respetando a toda su gente”.
Es probable que las cosas no salgan del mejor modo para EE.UU. Pero no se le puede quitar a Obama el valor de haber regado esa semilla.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
The economic liberalism that the world took for granted has given way to the White House’s attempt to gain sectarian control over institutions, as well as government intervention into private companies,
The economic liberalism that the world took for granted has given way to the White House’s attempt to gain sectarian control over institutions, as well as government intervention into private companies,
If the Green Party or No Labels candidates steal enough votes from Biden, they will go down in history as the idiot narcissists who helped Trump return to power and possibly finish off U.S. democracy.