Why an American Student Was Severely Punished for Humiliating His Teacher

Published in Sohu
(China) on 21 February 2011
by Peng Wei (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Stacy Wong. Edited by Gillian Palmer.
Recently, a news article stirred up commotion among parents. A high school student in Texas was fined $637 for being rude to his teacher, and until today, this student has been working part-time to pay off his fine. It may come as a surprise to parents that such severe punishment was doled out just because a student was rude to his teacher, leading us to wonder if there is no better way to educate a student other than fining him.

This piece of news seems dumbfounding at first sight, but it actually reveals much more if looked into carefully. In the U.S., schools strictly enforce their rules and allow for no form of flexibility. If students show up late without an acceptable reason, they will be asked to clean their classroom for a month; if students are caught cheating during examinations, they may even be expelled. We will not discuss whether these rules are too strictly enforced, but will talk about how we should learn from these instances. First, school rules are usually established collaboratively by the community and the parents’ association. Regardless of how strict the rules are, both parties are aware of the consequences and willingly accept them. Second, since the rules have been established, they should be strictly enforced. Besides, there is an entire investigative process that the school goes through, depending on the case being filed. Most of the fines are paid by the student through part-time work and are not paid by their parents.

On the other hand, this is not the case in our schools. As long as the student does not exceedingly breach the school rules, the school will show leniency to that student. Gradually, the power of school rules diminishes, and the school management can only hope that the teachers and students are disciplined enough to follow the rules. Furthermore, some schools previously established astonishing rules like requiring students to carry a bag, forbidding students from watching Hunan television and prohibiting the use of MP3 players, which led to much dissatisfaction. These kinds of school rules are often set by the school and lack objectivity as well as participation in the decision-making process. Most of the punishment is eventually handled by the parents, such as when the teacher calls on parents to educate their child properly, or when parents pay fines for their child. As such, we can only imagine how effective education is in China.

Li Ka-Shing once mentioned that ideas translate into behavior, behavior translates into habit, habit translates into personality, and personality translates into destiny. He talked about the importance of habitual behavior, and that nurturing good behavior requires individual commitment and discipline instilled by educators. If we want our society to become more aware of discipline and rules, why not start by following school rules?


美国学生辱师为何被重罚

 近日,一则新闻在家长圈里引起热议。美国得克萨斯州一名中学生在课堂上对老师出言不逊,被罚637美元,如今这名学生利用业余时间在餐馆打工挣钱 “还债”。课堂上就因为几句言语不敬,处罚如此之重,可能出乎中国家长的想象,就没有比罚款更好的教育方法了吗?

  这则新闻乍看有点让人哭笑不得,但仍有许多道理可以细细琢磨。在美国,校规校纪十分严格,不讲情面。学生迟到,如没有特殊原因,会被要求打扫一个月的班级卫生;考试作弊,有可能面临被开除的惩罚等。我们姑且不论这些校规是否过于严厉,但其制订和执行的严肃性和权威性,值得借鉴。首先,学校校规通常是由社区和家长委员会共同制订的,不管怎样严格,各方都知情、参与并接受;其次,规定既然制订,就必须严格执行,还有一整套申诉、调查等过程,校方根据实情对学生作出处理;大多数罚款由学生本人承担,要用自己的劳动偿还,而不是由家长代劳。

  反观我们一些学校,就不是这么回事了。对于违反校规校纪的行为,只要不是太过分,校方大多“留情面”,慢慢地,校规校纪的作用日益淡化,学校的管理,只能寄希望于教师和学生的自觉遵守。甚至,前段时间还出现一些“雷人”校规,比如大学生上课须背书包,禁看湖南卫视,不许用MP3等,引起学生的不满。这样的校规制订属于校方一厢情愿,缺乏广泛参与和公正性,最后的处罚往往转嫁给家长,要么老师把家长叫去教育一番,要么让家长为学生的罚款买单,教育效果可想而知。

  李嘉诚曾说过一句话:“栽种思想,成就行为;栽种行为,成就习惯;栽种习惯,成就性格;栽种性格,成就命运。”其中他说到了行为习惯的重要性,而良好行为习惯的养成,除了自身努力外,还要计算上教育者为孩子培养了多少规则意识。从内心形成规则意识,不妨从遵守校规校纪开始吧。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Afghanistan: State Capitalism in the US

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Topics

Afghanistan: State Capitalism in the US

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Related Articles

Afghanistan: State Capitalism in the US

Thailand: Appeasing China Won’t Help Counter Trump

India: Will New US Envoy Help to Repair Ties under Threat?

France: Global South: Trump Is Playing into China’s Hands

Zimbabwe: What the West Doesn’t Understand about China’s Growing Military Might