US Forces Contributing in Asia Without Losing Their Breath

Published in Nikkei
(Japan) on 7 January 2012
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Kenny Nagata. Edited by Mark DeLucas.
It will be difficult to act independently as the “global police” while grasping at the massive budget deficit. The Obama administration signaled at this new reality with its announcement of a new defense strategy. In order to not exhaust American military participation in Asia, Japan will need to contribute even more.

In order to address the economic difficulties, President Obama is making drastic cuts in the defense budget. The new strategy cuts the budget and is a desperate measure in thinking about how to maintain necessary military strength.

According to the new strategy, the focus will be to reduce American ground forces. However, they cannot abandon the reality of preparing for a “two-front operation” in two different regions.

This is not exactly a new decision. It was made to be able to resist simultaneously on two fronts in case disputes arose on the Korean peninsula and in the Middle East.

However, this strategy has shown its limits since the previous Bush administration. In 2010, the Obama administration began to reconsider this policy. Taking into account America’s serious financial situation, the decision was inevitable.

The worry now is the decision’s impact on the growth center of the world — the Asia Pacific. In the Asia-Pacific region, America’s presence is a point of stability. If the American military contribution weakens, it can cause harm to the region’s stability.

The new strategy affirms the emphasis of deployment routes in the case of war in the Asia Pacific, taking into account a rising China's possible threat to America’s security guarantee. We welcome the strengthening of their involvement in Asia.

However, no matter how much the Obama administration adheres to these decisions, the ability to carry out the decisions is another problem. For argument’s sake, if a situation arises where cutting additional funds for the U.S.'s defense budget is imminent, there is the possibility that they will not be able to treat the Asia-Pacific region as an exception.

Essential now to supporting the participation of the U.S. military in Asia is for U.S. allies like Japan, South Korea and Australia to actively contribute even more than they have.

Japan is also experiencing severe financial circumstances, but even so, there are many things that can be done. The archipelago off Southwestern Japan is an important area to the strategy for dealing with China. Strengthening these should be an important contribution to greater defense security in Asia. The Self-Defense Force possesses many Lockheed P-3 Orion patrol planes. Utilizing these should provide a way for them to assist in the surveillance of the surrounding seas.


巨額の財政赤字にあえぐなか、単独で「世界の警察」を任じることは難しい。オバマ米政権が公表した新国防戦略は、米国のこんな現実を印象づけた。米軍のアジア関与を息切れさせないためにも、日本の一層の貢献が必要だ。

オバマ大統領は財政難を乗り切るため、国防予算にも大なたを振るおうとしている。今回の新戦略は予算を削りつつ、必要な戦力をどうやって保っていくのか考えた末の窮余の策だ。

新戦略によると、米軍は地上戦力を中心に規模を縮小する。これに伴い、2つの地域の紛争に備える「二正面作戦」は事実上、放棄せざるを得なくなる。

これ自体はさほど、目新しい決定ではない。二正面作戦は朝鮮半島や中東で紛争が起きたとき、同時に対処できるようにするためのものだった。

しかし、米国はブッシュ前政権当時からこの作戦が限界にきているとの見方を示していた。オバマ政権も2010年に見直しの方針を打ち出している。米国の深刻な財政事情を考えれば、やむを得ない決定といえる。

気がかりなのは世界の成長センターであるアジア太平洋への影響だ。アジア太平洋では、米軍の存在こそが安定の要だ。米軍の関与が弱まれば、地域の安定が損なわれかねない。

新戦略では中国の台頭が米国の安全保障を脅かしかねないとして、アジア太平洋に戦力を重点配備する路線を確認した。アジアへの関与を強める決意の表れとして、歓迎したい。

だが、いくらオバマ政権がそうした決意を抱いていたとしても、その通りに実行できるかどうかは別問題だ。仮に、米国が国防予算の追加削減を迫られる事態になれば、もはやアジア太平洋を例外扱いできない可能性もある。

いま肝心なのは米国の同盟国である日本や韓国、オーストラリアなどが、米軍のアジア関与を支えるため、これまで以上に積極的に貢献していくことだ。

日本も厳しい財政事情を抱えている。それでもできることはたくさんある。日本の南西諸島は対中戦略上、重要な場所にある。これらの防衛強化はアジアの安全保障にも重要な貢献になるはずだ。自衛隊はP3C哨戒機を大量に保有している。これらを活用し、米軍による周辺海域の監視活動などを肩代わりすることも可能だろう。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Austria: Trump Is Playing with Fire. Does He Want the Whole House To Go up in Flames?

Switzerland: Trump’s Military Contingent in Los Angeles Is Disproportionate and Dangerous

   

Venezuela: The Devil in Los Angeles

Germany: Donald Trump’s Military Intervention in LA Is a Planned Escalation

Russia: Will the US Intervene in an Iran-Israel Conflict? Political Analyst Weighs the Odds*

Topics

Russia: Will the US Intervene in an Iran-Israel Conflict? Political Analyst Weighs the Odds*

Cuba: Summit between Wars and Other Disruptions

Germany: Resistance to Trump’s Violence Is Justified

Germany: LA Protests: Why Are So Many Mexican Flags Flying in the US?

Spain: Trump-Musk: Affair, Breakup and Reconciliation?

Switzerland: Trump’s Military Contingent in Los Angeles Is Disproportionate and Dangerous

   

Germany: If You’re Not for Him, You Should Be Afraid*

Austria: Trump Is Playing with Fire. Does He Want the Whole House To Go up in Flames?

Related Articles

Japan: Trump’s 100 Days: A Future with No Visible Change So Far

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Japan: US-Japan Defense Minister Summit: US-Japan Defense Chief Talks Strengthen Concerns about Single-Minded Focus on Strength

Japan: Trump’s Tariffs Threaten To Repeat Historical Mistakes

Hong Kong: China, Japan, South Korea Pave Way for Summit Talks; Liu Teng-Chung: Responding to Trump

Previous article
Next article