In Denmark, we are partial to letting conversations drift to the subject of pessimistic and reactionary Muslims, who rob women of their freedom and opportunities, and place them in a medieval darkness in terms of gender equality. But in reality there's a mounting danger that we're overlooking: the mix of religion and politics that is going on right now in the Western hemisphere, right under our noses.
We are dealing with extremists as well, but not the Muslim kind. On the contrary, they are typical white male evangelicals, Catholics and Mormons, who march forward with the Republican elephant and the tea party movement at the primaries in the U.S., and talk about "less state, lower taxes and more freedom." But not for women.
When it comes to women's freedom, they will stop at nothing — Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney will deprive women of the right to their own life choices. Not only are abortions proscribed at debates and in TV spots, but also contraception and family planning as a means to secure women’s opportunity to decide their own future about whether or not to have a flock of children to care for.
And you can safely start shuddering, as it was only a few years ago that the Bush administration implemented that exact policy in the poorest countries of the world. With the message “abstinence only” Bush, in alliance with the pope in Rome, deprived charities of financial aid to distribute condoms, even in areas with high HIV rates, despite the fact that “just say no” has never been documented to be effective or beneficial as a form of contraception.
It was completely different in 1960, when for the first time the Democrats nominated a Catholic for the presidential election. While John F. Kennedy publicly disassociated himself, in leaflets and speeches, from mixing politics and his personal beliefs were he to become president, the current Republican candidates do everything precisely in order to merge politics and religion.
The presidential candidate Rick Santorum directly attacked the notion of separation of church and state. On Sunday, Feb. 26, he made himself clear in an interview with ABC news that "The idea that the church can have no influence or no involvement in the operation of the state is absolutely antithetical to the objectives and vision of our country."
While it is obvious that, as a politician, you are certainly entitled to your personal belief, it should be clear for all, both in the U.S. and in Denmark, that religion must not mean that you force your beliefs on others and impose certain religious rituals — such as female circumcision — or in any way compel people to have a certain lifestyle.
All over the world young women die as a result of illegal abortions because access to safe contraception and, in emergency cases, safe abortion, has been made impossible by the pope and religious fundamentalist politics. And unfortunately, you don't have to venture far outside Denmark's borders for these kinds of policies to show themselves. Also in Europe, countries like Poland, Ireland and Malta, together with the Vatican, force women to take unnecessary risks with their lives.
So as we celebrate International Women's Day on March 8, it is important to remind each other just how much blood, sweat and tears it took for Denmark, on Oct. 1, 1973, to implement free abortion through the 12th week of pregnancy, and sexual health education in schools. And how important it is that we still defend this freedom, not just in Denmark, but in the rest of the world as well. Here in the Western world, we have a unique responsibility to walk in front and fly the flag. I do this every time I meet someone with a pessimistic and reactionary outlook on life, no matter where in the world the person may be and no matter the reason for his belief. Hereby I pass on the challenge!
Kvinders frihed er på spil – i den vestlige verden
I Danmark ynder vi at lade talen falde på ”muslimske mørkemænd”, der frarøver kvinder deres frihed og muligheder, og hensætter dem til middelalderens mørke, når vi skal tale ligestilling. Men i virkeligheden er der en stigende fare for, at vi i stedet overser den sammenblanding af religion og politik, som lige nu foregår i den vestlige verden, lige foran vores næser.
Her er også tale om fundamentalister, men ikke muslimske. Derimod er der tale om typisk hvide mandlige evangelister, katolikker og mormoner, der med den Republikanske elefant og Tea Party-bevægelsen marcherer frem ved Primærvalgene i USA, og taler om ”mindre stat, mindre skat og mere frihed”. Men altså ikke for kvinder.
Når det derimod kommer til kvinders frihed, så skyer man åbenbart ingen midler – herunder Rick Santorum, Newt Gingrich og Mitt Romney for at fratage kvinders ret til deres eget liv. Ikke bare bandlyser man aborter under debatter og TV-indslag, man dundrer også imod prævention og familieplanlægning, som midler til at sikre kvinders mulighed for selv at bestemme deres fremtid med eller uden en kæmpe børneflok at drage omsorg for.
Og man kan roligt gyse, for det er ikke mere end få år siden, at Bush-regeringen implementerede den selvsamme politik i verdens fattigste lande. Med beskeden ”abstension only” fratog Bush sammen med Paven i Rom finansieringen af hjælpeorganisationer, der udleverede kondomer, selv i områder med stor spredning af HIV/AIDS. Til trods for, at ”Just say no” som præventionsform aldrig har kunnet dokumenteres som værende virksom og gunstig.
Helt anderledes var det i 1960, da Demokraterne for første gang opstillede en katolik som præsidentkandidat. Mens John F. Kennedy i pjecer og i taler tog offentligt afstand mod at sammenblande politik og hans personlige religion i embedet som præsident, så gør de nuværende præsidentkandidater fra Republikanerne alt for sammenblande lige netop politik og religion.
Præsidentkandidat in spe Rick Santorum har direkte angrebet konceptet om adskillelse af kirke og stat. Søndag den 26. Februar 2012 udtrykte han direkte i et interview med ABC News at ”The idea that the church can have no influence or no involvement in the operation of the state is absolutely antithetical to the objectives and vision of our country. . .“.
Mens det er klart, at man som politiker selvfølgelig har ret til at have en personlig tro, så bør det dog være klart for alle både i USA og i Danmark, at religion ikke må betyde, at man tvinger andre til at tro på det samme, påtvinger bestemte religiøse ritualer, som f.eks. omskæring af piger eller på anden måde påtvinger folk en bestemt måde at leve på.
Overalt i verden dør unge kvinder som følge af illegale aborter, fordi adgangen til sikker prævention og i nødstilfælde sikker abort er gjort umuligt af Paven og fundamentalistisk religiøs politik. Og det er desværre ikke langt fra Danmarks grænser, at denne politik viser sit ansigt. Det er også i Europa, at lande som Polen, Irland, og Malta sammen med Vatikanet tvinger kvinder til at tage unødvendige risici med livet som indsats.
Så når vi fejrer Kvindernes Internationale Kampdag den 8. Marts, så er det vigtigt, at vi også husker hinanden på, hvor mange kræfter, sved og tårer det tog før Danmark 1. oktober 1973 kunne indføre den frie abort indenfor 12. graviditetsuge og seksualundervisning i skolerne. Og hvor vigtigt det er, at vi stadig forsvarer denne mulighed ikke bare her i Danmark, men også i resten af verden. Her i den vestlige verden, har vi et særligt ansvar for at gå forrest og vise flaget. Jeg gør det, når jeg møder en mørkemand. Uanset, hvor i verden vedkommende måtte befinde sig, og uanset baggrunden for hans tro. Hermed er opfordringen givet videre!
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
[T]he president failed to disclose that subsidies granted by his government — in connivance with the Republican Party — artificially maintain the viability of fossil fuels.
Contempt for him is so great that, in this country, Trump is conceded little, and his successes are ignored. One of them is the peace plan for the Gaza Strip.
In [Weiss'] articles, she attacked the alleged excesses of the left, criticized the 2017 Women's March against Trump and described intersectionality as a new caste system.
In [Weiss'] articles, she attacked the alleged excesses of the left, criticized the 2017 Women's March against Trump and described intersectionality as a new caste system.
Machado’s Nobel Prize is even more significant in light of recent U.S. military actions near Venezuela...A Nobel Prize that rewards peace should be viewed as a warning against military overreach.
Contempt for him is so great that, in this country, Trump is conceded little, and his successes are ignored. One of them is the peace plan for the Gaza Strip.