The Possibility of Romney’sEntering into the White House

Published in Zaobao
(Singapore) on 29 August 2012
by 谭中 (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Christine.Xiao. Edited by .

Edited by Adam Talkington

Due to the sudden attack of Hurricane Isaac, the four-day Republican National Convention scheduled for Aug. 27 in Tampa, Florida, in which the presidential nominee Romney and vice presidential nominee Ryan will appear in front of the public, has been delayed for one day. Almost all of the first-day speeches aimed at attacking Obama were cancelled. Worse still, Hurricane Isaac might be upgraded to a second-grade hurricane, bringing serious disasters to New Orleans and turning the cheerful atmosphere into a heavy-hearted solicitude.

If so, on the one hand, the invincible spirit of the planned Romney-Ryan “comeback team” will be greatly reduced. On the other hand, a week later, the unimpressive Democratic National Convention will take advantage of this to catch a pigtail of the Republicans. It seems that the gods are trying to help Obama.

On Aug. 11, two weeks after the appearance of Congressman Paul Ryan, the vice presidential nominee elaborately selected by Republican strategists, the lifeless Romney presidential selection suddenly shined. Young and aggressive, Ryan, who is the same age as Romney’s eldest son, showed that his ambition went even further than the latter’s when confronting Obama.

Before that, people (including members of the Republican Party) generally believed Romney was a weak competitor. This year’s selection is a vote on Obama’s four-year performance. Now, the Romney-Ryan pair has become very assertive. Public opinion has cast its lens on Romney, watching how he will take America out of its plight and judging if he is a qualified American leader.

For half a month, Republicans at the grassroots level have been very excited. Romney, who has been lagging behind in surveys of public opinion, has now jumped forward in the polls, becoming even with Obama. The Republican team posted a hopeful, confident posture, showing that they have methods for revitalizing the economy. The Democrats’ propaganda aimed at discrediting Romney was useless. Grassroots support for Democrats began to lose its passion.

Americans Are Tired of Obama’s Eloquent Speeches

The Republican’s wishful thinking was to repeat the historic change of 1980 (a year when both Romney Sr. and Reagan were state governors), when Republican presidential candidate Reagan pulled down President Carter, a Democrat. Just like Carter at that time, Obama faced the same sluggish economy and high unemployment. But Democrats do not believe that Romney has the charm that Reagan had, and Obama’s eloquence surpasses Carter’s.

Public opinion holds that Romney excels compared to Obama when it comes to revitalizing economy, but his likability cannot be compared with that of Obama. Democrats, on the one hand, deny that such a “gap” exists; on the other hand, they spared no effort to promote Romney’s image as a very human leader. This would be the subtext in Republican National Convention held in Tampa.

Obama is still popular wherever he goes for rallies, but the huge, overwhelming crowds of people that showed up four years ago are not seen any more. During his more than three years in office, Obama has constantly compromised, throwing away many of his campaign promises. Now, he’s afraid the public will not buy it if he tries again to win people’s trust by drawing a rosy picture for future.

People are tired of the courageous words of Obama. People will decide whether or not to cast a vote for him based on their economic situation. In the last presidential election, Obama was a star of “freedom and change.” This time, he is tied up by the rope of his work performance and has lost the “freedom.” It’s now Romney’s turn to be the star of “freedom and change.”

Currently, the ratio of support for Obama and Romney among women is 60:31. Black voters favor Obama over Romney at a rate of 94:0,* completely leaning to Obama’s side. Romney tried hard and went to the black community to strive for its support, but he has hardly gotten 3 percentage points. However, black Americans only account for 12.85 percent of the whole population. They will not have a big impact on the overall situation. The Romney-Ryan pair can only give up on winning black support.

Latinos, however, make up 22 percent of the entire population and are the fastest growing group. It’s said that Romney is unlikely to win if he fails to get 31 percent to 35 percent of the Latino vote. Currently, 67 percent of Latinos support Obama, while 23 percent support Romney.

That’s why the Republican National Convention was arranged in Tampa, Florida, which possesses a large Latino population. Up until now, Romney has spent seven times as much money on making Spanish advertisements as Obama. He also needs to show humanism when dealing with Hispanic issues to correct his “anti-Latino” image.

Both Parties Strive for Women’s Votes

Obama enjoys high prestige in American women. Nationwide, more women than men vote. So, if Obama can secure women’s votes, Romney can hardly win. Experts estimated that among middle-aged and elderly women, Romney also enjoys a certain prestige. Now Ryan has joined in, which helps to win relatively young women’s votes.

Romney and the Republicans’ strategy for winning women’s votes is not to separate women from family and community, and thus to avoid the endless quibbling over “abortion,” unlike the conservative party of Democrats. Instead, it aims at drawing women’s attention to the economy, employment, family and children, so as to enhance housewives’ support.

At the Tampa convention, Romney’s wife will appear like a super star. Her speech is arranged in the golden time slot of the first night. On the one hand, she will praise her husband’s virtues from a housewife’s perspective. On the other hand, she will promote the perfect image of “the first lady” and “the first family.”

Even since Obama was elected, many American right-wing conservatives have been determined to prevent him from being re-elected. In Obama’s presidency, the partisan division has been most serious. Many American hated him simply because of his name, skin color, ancestry and his international “anti-hegemony” speech. A majority of American really believe the rumors that he was an African Muslim born overseas.

Obama’s ruling policy has had two tendencies. First is to enhance the functions of government, and the second is to rectify the financial order and make a series of policies to supervise corporate behaviors, which resulted in a lack of investment, despite sufficient capital. People willing to create enterprises are reluctant to take risks. In addition, Obama’s new healthcare bill will be implemented next year. Middle and small-sized enterprises will be unable to afford the heavy burden of their employees’ medical insurance. Romney was just aiming at this point and shouted that his first priority would be to cancel Obama’s heath care reform bill and make new laws that both care for people’s livelihood and protect current insurance from bankruptcy.

The U.S. vote calculation method is very odd. It takes each state as a unit, and the number of votes for each state is determined by the ratio of its population [to that of the nation]. (The bigger the population, the more votes it gets.) The one who wins the most votes in a state will win all the votes for that state. Traditionally, states that support Democrats are called “blue states,” and states that support Republicans are called “red states.” The states [where the two parties] have equal strength are called “battleground states.”

This time, the Republicans are concentrating efforts on winning back battleground states by carrying out a “3-2-1” strategy, which consists of the following: 3. Recapture three states, namely Indiana, North Carolina and Virginia. 2. Regain Florida and Ohio. 1. Win just one more state (for example, Ryan’s Wisconsin) to finally win the White House.

*Editor’s notes: The ratio offered by the author here is undefined. CNN recently reported that 87 percent of registered black voters support Obama.


原定8月27日在佛罗里达州坦帕市揭幕,以便让下届正副总统候选人罗姆尼、瑞安正式亮相的四天共和党全国代表大会,因艾薩克(Isaac)风暴的突然来袭被迫推迟一天。预定日程中主要集中攻击奥巴马的首日讲演基本取消。更糟的是,艾薩克风暴可能升级成二级飓风,使新奥尔良等地遭受严重灾害而把三天大会喜气洋洋的欢腾变成心情沉重的慰问。

  如果真是这样,一方面原计划的罗姆尼-瑞安“后来居上团队”(comeback team)以雷霆万钧之势一鸣惊人锐气会大减,另一方面还会使一周后本来乏善可陈的民主党全国代表大会有文章好做、有共和党的小辫好抓,似乎天助奥巴马也。

  8月11日,经过共和党战略专家精心挑选出的副总统候选人、国会众议员保罗·瑞安(Paul Ryan)亮相的两周以来,有点死气沉沉的罗姆尼总统竞选突然大放光芒,瑞安年轻(和罗姆尼长子同年)气盛、杀气腾腾,与奥巴马针锋相对有过之无不及。

  此前,人们(包括共和党内部)认为罗姆尼是弱势竞选者,今年总统大选主要是对奥巴马四年政绩进行信任投票。现在罗姆尼-瑞安搭档变成强势,舆论把镜头对准罗姆尼如何能使美国经济走出窘境,衡量他是不是合格的美国统帅。

  半个月来,共和党基层振奋,罗姆尼在民意调查中原先持久滞后,现在一跃而与奥巴马持平,共和党阵营摆出有希望、有信心、有办法振兴经济的姿态,民主党想搞臭罗姆尼的宣传失灵,民主党基层热情低落。

美国人不愿再听奥巴马豪言壮语

  共和党的如意算盘是重新炮制1980年共和党候选人里根把民主党总统卡特拉下马来的转变,因为罗姆尼和里根同是州长,奥巴马像卡特那样经济不振、失业率高。民主党却不认为罗姆尼有里根那种魅力,奥巴马竞选口才又比卡特优越。

  民意认为在振兴经济上罗姆尼比奥巴马强,却存在着与奥巴马的“可亲度”(likability)差距。共和党一方面否认这种“差距”说,另一方面却极力宣扬罗姆尼是“人情味”极为丰富的领袖,这将是坦帕市共和党盛会上的潜台词。

  奥巴马现在到各地竞选仍受热烈欢迎,却看不到四年前那种群情沸腾、人山人海的场面。三年多总统期间,奥巴马一味妥协,把竞选时的很多承诺丢得一干二净,现在竞选再唱新调,想编织美好未来景象劫持选民信任恐怕不能奏效了。

  人们不再听奥巴马的豪言壮语,而要根据他们所处的经济境况决定是否投票给他。上届竞选奥巴马是“自由改变”(free change)明星,这次他被自己四年政绩绳捆索绑而无“自由”,轮到罗姆尼当“自由改变”明星了。

  此刻妇女对奥巴马与罗姆尼的支持率是60比31,黑人对奥巴马与罗姆尼的支持率是94比0,太一边倒了。罗姆尼花了九牛二虎之力到黑人社区去夺取奥巴马的基地也难以拿到三几个百分比。不过,黑人在美国人口中只占12.85%,不影响大局。

  罗姆尼-瑞安搭档只得放弃黑人选票争夺,但拉丁裔占美国人口22%,又是美国人口增长最快的群体。有人说,如果罗姆尼得不到31至35%的拉丁裔选票,他就不能胜选。当前奥巴马的拉丁裔支持率67%,罗姆尼只有23%。

  这就是为什么共和党盛会要在拉丁裔集中聚居的佛罗里达州坦帕市举行的最大原因。如今,罗姆尼用拉美西班牙语制作广告的花费是奥巴马的七倍。罗姆尼还得在处理非法入境的拉丁裔问题上表现出人道主义来,纠正“反拉丁裔”印象。  

妇女选票成为双方争夺票仓 

  奥巴马在美国妇女中威信极高,全国妇女投票率高于男性,奥巴马若能大赢巾帼选票,罗姆尼就休想获胜。行家估计在中老年妇女中,罗姆尼也有一定威望。现在瑞安参赛对争取较年轻的妇女有利。

  罗姆尼和共和党人在争取妇女选票上的策略是不把妇女与家庭区别开来,不和民主党在保守派一贯反对的“打胎”问题上纠缠,把妇女的注意力吸引到经济、就业、家庭、孩子方面去,这样来加大家庭妇女的支持。

  在坦帕市共和党盛会上,罗姆尼夫人将以超级明星姿态亮相,她的讲演安排在三天大会头天晚上的黄金时段,一方面让她以主妇的立场宣扬男主人的美德,另一方面争取人们向往她成为新“第一夫人”,宣传未来“第一家庭”的完美。

  自从奥巴马当上总统以后很多美国右派与极端保守人士就铁了心要阻止他连任,奥巴马任内美国政治垂直分裂现象是有史以来最严重的。许多美国人是从他的名字、肤色、祖先以及国际场合的“反对霸权”言论来憎恨奥巴马的。有很大一部分美国人真正相信舆论谣言,认为他是在外国出生的非洲裔兼伊斯兰教徒。

  奥巴马的执政方针有两大倾向,一是加大政府职能,二是整顿金融秩序、对企业行为制定一些监督管制。这就使得当前美国虽然有充裕的资金但投资不踊跃,有志于企业者不愿冒风险,外加明年开始实行奥巴马的新医疗法令,中小企业担忧将来会不堪支付员工医疗保险费的重负。罗姆尼正是针对这点大喊他进白宫的首要任务就是取消奥巴马的医疗改革法令,建立亲民而又使现有保险不致破产的新法。

  美国总统选举计票方法奇特,以州为单位,但各州票数按人口比重决定(人口越多票数越多),谁在一个州赢得多数就囊括该州选票。传统支持民主党的州称之为“蓝州”,支持共和党的州称之为“红州”,势力均等的州叫“争夺州”。

  这次共和党采取集中力量赢回“争夺州”的“3-2-1”的战略,要把印第安纳、北卡罗利纳、弗吉尼亚“3”个州拿下,强攻佛罗里达和俄亥俄“2”州取胜,然后再多拿“1”州(比方说,瑞安的威斯康星州)就会大功告成。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Ireland: The Irish Times View on Trump vs the Fed: Rocky Times Ahead

Australia: Australia Is Far from Its Own Zohran Mamdani Moment. Here’s Why

Germany: NATO Secretary-General Showers Trump with Praise: Seems Rutte Wanted To Keep the Emperor Happy

China: US Visa Policy Policing Students

Colombia: The Horsemen of the New Cold War

Topics

Australia: Donald Trump Just Won the Fight To Remake America in 3 Big Ways

Colombia: The Horsemen of the New Cold War

Australia: Australia Is Far from Its Own Zohran Mamdani Moment. Here’s Why

Canada: How Ottawa Gift-Wrapped our Dairy Sector for Trump

Canada: New York Swoons over an American Justin Trudeau

Germany: Europe Bending the Knee to Trump

Germany: NATO Secretary-General Showers Trump with Praise: Seems Rutte Wanted To Keep the Emperor Happy

China: US Chip Restrictions Backfiring

Related Articles

Singapore: Trump’s America Brings More Chaos, but Not Necessarily More Danger

Singapore: No Ukraine Cease-fire – Putin Has Called Trump’s Bluff

Singapore: Lessons from the Trump-Zelenskyy Meltdown – for Friends and Foes

Singapore: In Trump and Musk’s America, Echoes of China’s Past Emerge