For the second consecutive election, the Republican Party of the United States lost the presidential election in the state of Florida.
What happened? It was expected that Cuban-Americans in the south of Florida would en masse vote for Mitt Romney, but this wasn’t the case.
Why? A Republican president would surely toughen economic sanctions against Cuba.
In the case of Cubans who no longer have ties to the island, they are increasingly supporting the small changes that Barack Obama has made in regard to restrictions in Cuba.
Family-related travel to Cuba, sending remittances in small amounts andother changes would be lost if Romney won.
Cuban-Americans who have ties with the island are concerned that stricter economic sanctions against their motherland would harm their families.
In addition, the Puerto Rican community, the Mexican, the Brazilian and others are not interested in the issue of Cuba.
They simply worry about getting jobs, paying their mortgages, credit cards and getting out of the recession.
For no reason other than the irony of life the U.S. has maintained an economic blockade against Cuba for 50 years, using the excuse that the country isn’t a democracy. However, it does not do anything against Communist China.
It is obvious that the gigantic Chinese market and its ability to produce cheap items for the United States forces the U.S. to swallow its words in comparison to Cuba.
The third generation of Cuban-Americans wants a change in their nation, the U.S., the nation where they now have relatives.
Even though Cuba has made small steps to change its economic system — perhaps to reduce the size of the government — it still has a long way to go.
One area where Cuba could begin to make changes: allowing its citizens to travel. You have to start somewhere.
Una presidencia republicana endurecerÃa más las sanciones económicas contra Cuba.
Si se trata de cubanos que ya no tienen vÃnculos con la Isla, apoyan incrementar las restricciones que Barack Obama levantó a Cuba.
Viajes de familiares, envÃos de dinero en pocas cantidades, intercambios culturales y otros se perderÃan si Romney ganaba.
Pero a los norteamericanos de origen cubano y que tienen vÃnculos con la Isla, sà les preocupa que sus familiares sean perjudicados con endurecer las medidas económicas contra su madre patria.
Por ironÃa de la vida Estados Unidos mantiene un bloqueo económico contra Cuba desde hace 50 años, bajo el argumento de que esta nación no es democrática. Sin embargo, no lo hace contra China comunista.
Es obvio que el gigantesco mercado chino y la mano de obra barata para fábricas de Estados Unidos hacen que se traguen sus palabras en comparación con Cuba.
Pero más allá de esto, los ciudadanos estadounidense-cubanos, de tercera generación, quieren un cambio de su nación [EE.UU.] hacia el paÃs donde tienen parientes.
Aunque Cuba ha dado pasos lentos para cambiar su sistema económico (quizás más para reducir el tamaño del Estado), todavÃa falta.
Uno de ellos es la eliminación de las trabas para que sus ciudadanos viajen a terceros paÃses. Por algo se empieza.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
If this electoral gridlock [in domestic policy] does occur, it may well result in Trump — like several other reelected presidents of recent decades — increasingly turning to foreign policy.
What happened to this performing arts center is paradigmatic of how Trump’s second presidency ... [is] another front in a war ... to impose an autocratic regime led by a 21st century feudal lord outside of international law.
Whether George HW Bush or Donald J Trump, Americanimperialism is unabated—the pathetic excuses and the violentshock-and-awe tactics don’t matter; the results do.