A War with No Winners

Published in China News
(China) on 20 March 2013
by Shaoxian Li (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Stefanie Zhou. Edited by Natalie Clager.
This war is a disaster for the country and the people of Iraq. Although Iraq is already in a disastrous state after the Iran-Iraq War, the invasion of Kuwait and the ensuing Gulf War, the incident that truly led the country and its people into the current, catastrophic state is the Iraq War, which began 10 years ago. Ten years after the start of the war, tens of thousands of civilians have died in terrorist bombings; the nation has fallen into a de facto split that severely restricts the reconstruction and development of post-war Iraq. A Chinese diplomat who used to work in Iraq said emotionally: The average citizen in Iraq used to be so rich that we were ashamed to give him $10 in tip, but today even young people have appeared begging along the streets of Iraq.

This war led to a serious imbalance of geopolitical power in the Middle East, bringing disastrous consequences to the region. Historical record shows that a relative balance between the four geopolitical powers of Middle East — the Arab countries, Iran, Turkey and Israel — is the basic condition for stability in the Middle East. In the last decade of the last century, the Clinton administration, taking charge of Middle East order at that time, promoted “peace talks in the West” — the Arab-Israeli peace process — and “containment of Iran and Iraq in the East.” At the same time, Iran and Iraq maintained checks and balances against each other. The Middle East as a whole exhibited one of its few relatively calm and stable periods. The Palestinian-Israeli peace process made significant progress. But U.S. military action after 9/11, especially the war in Iraq, eventually ended this short-term regional power balance. Geopolitical power in the Middle East thus became seriously imbalanced, which influenced the situation in the Middle East after the Iraq war.

This war is also a disaster to the United States, who waged the war. Ten years after the war, more and more Americans recognize the war in Iraq is a "strategic failure" of the United States. In addition to huge military spending and thousands of U.S. troops’ lives lost, the war also caused U.S. strategy to deviate substantially from the original global anti-terrorism track and greatly reduced its soft power. No one will forget how ten years ago, in order to gain support for the war from the international community, then Secretary of State Colin Powell presented so-called evidence that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction at a United Nations Security Council meeting. However, it turned out the two major reasons the United States had for launching the war, Saddam Hussein’s possession of weapons of mass destruction and ties with al-Qaida, were non-existent. The act of fabricating so-called intelligence to deceive the world to achieve its own goals greatly diminished the United States’ international reputation.

The historical lessons are worth learning. Since the start of the 21st century, the U.S.-led West launched and participated in three wars that have had significant impact on both the Middle East and the whole world: the war in Afghanistan, the war in Iraq and the Libyan war. All three wars, without exception, brought serious consequences to all parties. Afghanistan today still lacks tranquility; the Taliban bounces back just as the U.S is withdrawing at large scale; the situation in Iraq continues to be unstable; Libya exhibits a local separatist trend and the authority of the central government is proving difficult to build. These painful truths elucidate another truth: It is inevitable that any foreign interference, especially foreign military interference, must contain the strong political will of the interfering country. If it doesn’t then, without exception, it will never bring positive results to the nation in question.

Author Shaoxian Li is the vice president of the China Institute of Contemporary International Relations

Originally edited by Shichun Ye


  原题:一场典型的“多输”战争

  10年前的3月20日,美国打响了伊拉克战争。这是一场典型的没有赢家的战争。

  这场战争是伊拉克国家和人民的灾难。尽管在历经两伊战争、科威特战争及随之而来的海湾战争后,伊拉克已经千疮百孔,但真正使伊拉克国家和人民陷入灾难性处境的还是10年前这场伊拉克战争。战后10年来,死于恐怖爆炸事件的平民成千上万;国家事实上陷入分裂,严重制约着战后伊拉克的重建和发展。一位曾在伊拉克工作过的中国外交官感慨地说:当年的伊拉克普通民众是如此富有,以至于10美元的小费我们都羞于出手,而今天的伊拉克街头甚至出现了乞讨的年轻人。

  这场战争导致中东地缘政治力量严重失衡,给地区局势带来灾难性后果。历史经验显示,中东地缘政治四大力量(阿拉伯国家、伊朗、土耳其和以色列)间构成的相对平衡是中东地区局势稳定的基本条件。上世纪最后10年,当时主导中东秩序的美国克林顿政府在此推行“西促和谈”(阿以和平进程)、“东遏两伊”(伊朗、伊拉克)的政策,同时两伊间又相互制衡,中东地区曾出现一段少有的相对平静和稳定的局面,巴以和平进程还取得了明显的进展。但这种短暂的地缘政治力量平衡最终被“9·11”事件后美国在此的军事行动、特别是伊拉克战争所打破。中东地缘政治力量由此变得严重失衡,并成为影响伊拉克战争后中东局势的重要因素。

  这场战争对发动战争的美国本身也是一场灾难。战后10年来,越来越多的美国人认识到,伊拉克战争是美国的一次“战略性失败”。除了巨额军费和数千名美军官兵的性命之外,这场战争还使美国的战略严重偏离了原有的全球反恐轨道,并使其软实力受到巨大损伤。大家都不会忘记,10年前,美国为获得国际社会支持开战,时任国务卿鲍威尔曾在联合国安理会会议上图文并茂展示所谓萨达姆拥有大规模杀伤性武器的证据,但事后证明,美国当年发动战争的两大理由(萨达姆拥有大规模杀伤性武器和与“基地”组织有染)均为子虚乌有。为实现一己之目的,不惜编造所谓情报证据欺骗世人,使美国的国际信誉大为失色。

  历史经验值得汲取。进入21世纪以来,以美国为首的西方直接发动和参与了对中东地区及世界局势产生重大影响的三场战争:阿富汗战争、伊拉克战争和利比亚战争。从战争的结果看,三场战争无一例外地都给当事国带来了严重后果。阿富汗迄今无安宁之日,在美军即将大规模撤出之时,塔利班又呈卷土重来之势;伊拉克局势持续动荡;利比亚也呈现地方割据态势,中央政府的权威难以真正建立。惨痛的事实再次告诉世人:凡是外来干涉、特别是外来军事干涉,毫无例外都必然带有干涉国本身强烈的政治意志,因此也毫无例外绝不会给当事国带来积极的结果。(李绍先 作者为中国现代国际关系研究院副院长)

【编辑:叶士春】
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Switzerland: Donald Trump: 100 Days Already, but How Many Years?

     

Topics

Mexico: EU: Concern for the Press

Austria: Musk, the Man of Scorched Earth

Germany: Cynicism, Incompetence and Megalomania

Switzerland: Donald Trump: 100 Days Already, but How Many Years?

     

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Related Articles

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Hong Kong: Can US Tariffs Targeting Hong Kong’s ‘Very Survival’ Really Choke the Life out of It?