Big Brother Is Listening

Published in Le Figaro
(France) on 1 July 2013
by Pierre Rousselin (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Lindsey Cambridge. Edited by Gillian Palmer.
Nearly 30 years late by George Orwell’s predictions, we have entered into the era of Big Brother, the fictional character from his sci-fi novel, “1984.” An increasingly Orwellian America scans every exchange in order to quench an endless thirst for information — which brings us to some revelations on the means and methods of the National Security Agency (NSA), the American intelligence agency.

The fight against terrorism and the legal arsenal established by the United States in the wake of the Sept. 11 attacks have rendered such abuse possible. But they don’t justify it.

In Berlin, Barack Obama intended to put minds at ease by explaining that the end could justify the means and that it would be necessary to find a good balance between security and rights. But we are considerably past this stage. In a democracy, access to personal data must be controlled and the rights of everyone protected. The history of totalitarianism in Europe is enough to remind us why.

America has to respond all the more seriously to questioning as negotiations advance in preparation for the creation of a large transatlantic market, which will inevitably be under stricter regulations. François Hollande was right to express indignation. But protests from Europeans have their limits: Without sharing American intelligence, it’s hard to see how they would ensure their own security.


Big Brother vous écoute

Avec près de trente ans de retard sur les prédictions de George Orwell, nous sommes entrés dans l'ère de Big Brother, le personnage de fiction de son roman d'anticipation, 1984. Une Amérique devenue orwellienne scrute les moindres échanges pour étancher une soif inépuisable de renseignements. Voilà ce qu'il ressort des révélations sur les moyens et les méthodes de la NSA, l'agence américaine de surveillance.

La lutte contre le terrorisme et l'arsenal juridique mis en place aux États-Unis au lendemain des attentats du 11 septembre 2001 ont rendu possibles de tels abus. Cela ne peut les justifier.

À Berlin, Barack Obama a voulu rassurer en expliquant que la fin pouvait justifier les moyens et qu'il suffirait de trouver « le bon équilibre » entre la sécurité et les libertés. Ce stade est largement dépassé. En démocratie, l'accès aux données individuelles doit être réglementé et les droits de chacun protégés. L'histoire des totalitarismes en Europe suffit à rappeler pourquoi.

L'Amérique doit répondre d'autant plus sérieusement aux interrogations que des négociations vont s'engager en vue de la création d'un grand marché transatlantique qui sera, inévitablement, soumis aux règles du plus fort. François Hollande a raison d'exprimer son indignation. Mais les protestations des Européens ont leurs limites : sans partager les renseignements américains, on voit mal comment ils assureraient leur propre sécurité.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Australia: US Midterm Results Devastating for Donald Trump, but He Is Far from a Lame Duck

China: Four ‘Surprises’ in the US Midterm Elections

Ireland: Irish Examiner View: Time for US Democrats To Plan

Canada: Mark Carney Says US Trade Talks Back On, but Canadians Left in Dark

South Africa: ‘America First’ in Africa: Coltan and Cash for Condoms and the ‘El Chapos’

Topics

Australia: Donald Trump ‘Would Get Ratings Bump for Firing Pete Hegseth’, like on The Apprentice

Australia: Why Cost-of-Living Concerns Are Up-Ending Global Politics

Ireland: Irish Examiner View: Time for US Democrats To Plan

Mexico: United States: The Offended Party’s Turn

Japan: US Republican Party Defeat: A Heavy Anti-Trump Judgment

China: Four ‘Surprises’ in the US Midterm Elections

Egypt: Trump Is Drowning in the Blue Flood

India: Beyond the Blue Wave: American Voters Deliver the Reset the World Was Waiting for

Related Articles

Spain: France in the Face of Chaos

Saudi Arabia: A World without NATO… What Would It Look Like?

Israel: Faced with Diplomatic Impotence, War against Iran Is Legitimate

France: Donald Trump’s Dangerous Game with the Federal Reserve