Nobody in the world is safe from the arrogance of the U.S. and the countries that are loyal to it.
On Tuesday in Europe, Bolivian President Evo Morales was forced to stay for more than 13 hours in an Austrian airport waiting for authorization for his plane to return to Bolivia, due to three countries denying him passage in their airspace. The event has come close to causing an international conflict and has created a huge scandal.
When the presidential plane was returning from Moscow, where our president had participated in the Gas Exporting Countries Forum, France declared that it had no authorization to fly over their airspace, a measure that was repeated by Portugal and Italy; this forced the crew to take a detour and make an emergency landing in Vienna. This situation led the government in La Paz to report a form of kidnapping, since the president and his team were literally detained against their will and prevented from returning home.
The itinerary included a stop to refuel in the Canary Islands, a Spanish territory which at that point was off-limits for the Bolivian plane. The Bolivian government then reported that Spain had declared passage and the planned landing would be allowed, provided that they would be allowed to search the plane for ex-agent Edward Snowden. Snowden has been pursued by the U.S. for reporting the existence of a communications surveillance program on a global scale, and was thought to be on board so he could be sheltered by Bolivia, thus revealing the embarrassing reason the European countries had stopped the flight.
The Bolivian report, presented before the Secretary General of the U.N. and other multi-lateral institutions, caused understandable anger among governments of the region, who immediately announced a meeting of the Union of South American Nations and a popular protest in the country. This included a protest at the door of the French embassy in La Paz and numerous protests in support of the president, as well as a few expressions that showed the pettier side of some of the opposition’s spokespeople.
Soon, without delay, it became known that what France, Spain, Portugal and Italy did was a flagrant violation of international law, given the rules of international diplomacy initiated with the Vienna Convention in 1961, which explicitly established the immunity of presidents and heads of state and the modes of transport that they use, as well as the obligation to offer them all necessary protection.
After more than 13 hours of nervous anticipation, the problem was resolved and the president was able to return to the country, following his previous itinerary. However, by then the damage was already done; even considering the apologies given by the French president, it is still clear that nobody in the world is safe from the arrogance of the U.S. and the countries that are loyal to it.
Nadie en el mundo está a salvo de la prepotencia de EEUU y de los países que le son leales
Lo ocurrido el martes en Europa, donde el Presidente del Estado fue obligado a permanecer por más de 13 horas esperando en un aeropuerto de Austria la autorización para que su avión pudiera regresar a Bolivia, debido a que tres países le impidieron surcar su espacio aéreo, ha estado a punto de causar un conflicto internacional y ha provocado un escándalo mayor.
En efecto, cuando el avión presidencial estaba volando de regreso desde Moscú, donde el Mandatario había participado del Foro de Países Exportadores de Gas, Francia anunció que no tenía autorización para surcar su cielo, idéntica medida fue comunicada por Portugal e Italia; lo que obligó a la tripulación a hacer un desvío y aterrizaje de emergencia en Viena. Esta situación indujo al Gobierno en La Paz a denunciar una suerte de secuestro, pues el Presidente y su equipo estaban literalmente retenidos contra su voluntad e impedidos de regresar a casa.
El itinerario incluía una parada para repostar en las Islas Canarias, territorio español en ese momento cerrado para la aeronave boliviana. El Gobierno informó luego que España había anunciado que autorizaría el paso y aterrizaje previstos con la condición de que se permitiera revisar el avión en busca del exagente Edward Snowden, perseguido por EEUU por denunciar la existencia de un programa de vigilancia de las comunicaciones a escala mundial, supuestamente a bordo para ser refugiado por Bolivia, revelándose así la vergonzante razón que tenían los países europeos para impedir el tránsito de la nave.
La denuncia boliviana, presentada ante la Secretaría General de la ONU, así como otras instituciones multilaterales, causó comprensible enojo en los gobiernos de la región, que inmediatamente convocaron a reunión de Unasur y una protesta popular en el país, que incluyó una manifestación en la puerta de la embajada francesa en La Paz y numerosas manifestaciones de apoyo al Mandatario, así como unas pocas expresiones que mostraron el lado más mezquino de algunos portavoces de la oposición.
Más pronto que tarde se supo que lo hecho por Francia, España, Portugal e Italia fue una flagrante vulneración del Derecho Internacional, pues las normas de la diplomacia internacional, comenzando por el Pacto de Viena de 1961, establecen explícitamente la inmunidad de los mandatarios y jefes de Estado y de los medios de transporte que usen, así como la obligación de brindarles toda la protección necesaria.
Después de más de 13 horas de tensa espera, el problema fue resuelto y el Mandatario pudo retornar al país siguiendo el itinerario previsto. Sin embargo, para entonces el daño ya estaba hecho, e incluso considerando las disculpas expresadas por el Presidente francés, ha quedado claro que nadie en el mundo está a salvo de la prepotencia de Estados Unidos y los países que le son leales.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
Contempt for him is so great that, in this country, Trump is conceded little, and his successes are ignored. One of them is the peace plan for the Gaza Strip.
[The Democrats] need to find a campaign issue which will resonate beyond their liberal-metropolitan heartlands before the midterm elections in the fall of 2026.
Machado’s Nobel Prize is even more significant in light of recent U.S. military actions near Venezuela...A Nobel Prize that rewards peace should be viewed as a warning against military overreach.
Contempt for him is so great that, in this country, Trump is conceded little, and his successes are ignored. One of them is the peace plan for the Gaza Strip.
The paternalism with which the United States has been taking on the economy (with trade as a strategy) and the territory of South and Central America dates back a long time.
Biden's triumph has given us a guiding narrative: the idea that, in the worst circumstances, believing, organizing and mobilizing can produce a kind of miracle.