Gap between EU and US May Lie in China's Interests

Published in Huanqiu
(China) on 8 July 2013
by Zhao Yongsheng (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Jingman Xiao. Edited by Mary Young.
As the Snowden affair continues to ferment, the European press has disclosed that the National Security Agency conducted surveillance on many of its allies, including EU countries. What impact on U.S.-EU relations does this surveillance have? The author thinks that America has angered the EU, the sleeping tiger.

As world trade tends to be more integrated, the free trade agreement has become an important leverage tool for policymakers trying to push forward their national economies by promoting external trade. This is especially true of the U.S. and EU, the biggest economies of the world, who are respectively facing the recent recovery from the U.S. debt crisis and the unending European debt crisis. The “friction” between America and the EU will undoubtedly exert some negative effects on the ongoing negotiations over the U.S.-EU free trade agreement. The European Commission and countries such as Germany and France have already announced that the talks will be held as scheduled; however, both parties will also hold workshops discussing the information regarding the intelligence work of the U.S. European Commissioner Viviane Reding said bluntly, “If our partners are suspected of eavesdropping on European delegates' offices … we have no way to negotiate.” According to the European and U.S. press, this indicates that the talks will not be smooth.

Under such a circumstance, China should seize the opportunity by “cozying up to” Europe, which will facilitate the establishment of the new world order, dominated by China, the U.S. and the EU. Although European countries have always been the most reliable allies of America since World War I, the Europeans have never felt comfortable being the “supporting actors” on the international stage. Except for Germany, France, Spain and Italy, the rest of the European continent is filled with small states, which is why they could only unite to survive and balance the two poles: America and the USSR. However, as the formation of the post-Cold War unipolarity featuring the U.S. is complete, China and the EU naturally would want to become the new pole. In this sense, China and Europe have a lot in common.

If this incident is to bring any good to China, it has to be the fact that China has a bigger chance of winning in the free trade negotiation. As a matter of fact, in peaceful times, spying and surveillance are mostly for the sake of obtaining adversaries' economic information. The reason America spies on its “die-hard” ally is to get the EU's high-end technological intelligence and core infuriation in bulk to obtain a competitive advantage for U.S. companies with economic interests. It happens that there is a similar case, where China is also striving to open the door to European trade. It signed free trade agreements with Iceland and Switzerland successively, hoping that these two non-EU members could have a “catfish” effect on member states. Therefore, subject to the condition that the free trade talks between America and the EU are likely to be affected, China needs to speed up its attempts to be on more intimate terms with the EU.

After all, spying and surveillance are popular means in Western countries, and the type of die-hard relationship between America and the EU is not built in one day. The “trivial” is perfectly understood by both. European politicians' constant declarations of their stances are nothing but them making use of the subject to elaborate their own ideas and give themselves greater popularity. Anyway, China should use this opportunity and make America restrain its investigation into Huawei and Zhongxing. This will also accelerate the process of the China-EU free trade talks and to some extent strengthen political trust between China and the EU, realizing a win-win situation based on observable interests by making use of the uneven EU-U.S. talks.


 在斯诺登事件持续发酵之际,欧洲媒体先后爆料称,美国国家安全局对包括欧盟国家在内的诸多盟友实施监听。那么,美国对欧洲盟友的情报监听活动究竟会对美欧关系产生何种影响?笔者认为,此次美国已激怒欧盟这只“卧虎”。

  随着世界贸易的日趋一体化,自贸协定成了各国决策者期望通过促进对外贸易,以拉动本国经济的一个重要政策杠杆,尤其对美国和欧盟这两个世界上最大的经济体而言,它们要分别面对美债危机的“大病初愈”以及欧债危机的久而未决。美欧“摩擦”无疑将对在谈的美欧自由贸易协定产生负面影响。欧盟委员会和德法等国已经宣布,将如期开始自贸区谈判,但双方也将成立工作组同时开展关于美国情报工作的信息交流。欧盟委员维维亚娜·雷丁直言不讳地表示,“如果我们的伙伴涉嫌正在窃听欧洲谈判代表的办公室……我们就没有办法谈判”自贸协定。欧美媒体认为,这一波折预示自贸谈判不会太顺利。

  面对这种局面,中国应适时加以利用,“拉拢”欧盟,从而有利于开启中美欧“三足鼎立”的世界新格局。欧洲诸国尽管一战以来就是美国最可靠的盟友,但欧洲人其实一直并不甘心在国际舞台上充当配角。欧洲大陆除了德法西意之外,大部分都是小国,因而只能走联合之路,以抗衡当时的美苏“两极”。而面对冷战后美国“单极”霸权的形成,中国和欧盟自然都有担当世界新极点的念想。在这个意义上,中欧有很多共同语言。

  如果此次波折可能为中国带来利好,那莫过于中国在与欧盟的自贸谈判上多了几分胜算。其实,在当今和平时代,间谍与监视行动绝大多数都是为了获取对方的经济情报。美国对“铁杆盟友”下手,图谋的自然是欧盟的高精尖科技情报以及大宗合同的核心信息,进而为美国企业谋取竞争优势与经济利益。无独有偶,在美国与欧盟谈判自贸协定之际,中国也在积极开展撬开欧洲贸易大门的努力,先后与冰岛和瑞士签署自贸协定,希望这两个非欧盟成员国能对欧盟成员国产生“鲶鱼效应”。因此,在美欧自贸谈判有可能受到影响的前提下,中国需要加速促成欧盟对华的贸易“亲近”。

  其实,间谍和监视是西方国家常用的手段,美国和欧盟的铁杆关系也不是一天两天形成的,美欧之间的那点“破事”,双方自然是心知肚明。欧洲政客们频频表态,无非就是借题发挥,多给自己加点分。但无论如何,中国应顺势利用此次事件,不但让美国人在针对华为和中兴的调查上多加收敛,利用美欧自贸谈判的不畅,加速启动中欧自贸谈判,而且在一定程度上加强中欧政治互信,在双方切实可见的利益上实现“双赢”。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Israel: Trump’s National Security Adviser Forgot To Leave Personal Agenda at Home and Fell

Germany: Absolute Arbitrariness

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Mexico: EU: Concern for the Press

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Topics

Canada: The Walls Are Closing in on Donald Trump’s Ramblings

   

Austria: Trump’s Film Tariffs Hurt Hollywood

Japan: Trump’s 100 Days: A Future with No Visible Change So Far

Mexico: EU: Concern for the Press

Austria: Musk, the Man of Scorched Earth

Germany: Cynicism, Incompetence and Megalomania

Switzerland: Donald Trump: 100 Days Already, but How Many Years?

     

Austria: Donald Trump Revives the Liberals in Canada

Related Articles

Mexico: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Venezuela: Vietnam: An Outlet for China

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Hong Kong: Can US Tariffs Targeting Hong Kong’s ‘Very Survival’ Really Choke the Life out of It?