Over the years, the United States has existed as an intimidating force against the large drug traffickers, and it was understood that in that jurisdiction, the traffickers were facing harsher judges, more drastic sanctions, and the greatest possibility of receiving prison without privileges for their crimes and the harm committed against society.
The fear of extradition unleashed a bloody defiance from the drug trafficking cartels against the United States, such as in Colombia. In other countries, like this one, the local drug lords unleashed intense legal battles to avoid facing the justice of the United States. Today, the story is changing.
It seems that the U.S. is only interested in resolving their affairs, without caring for the crimes or the harm committed in the societies that purge the extradited.
They negotiate with the extradited criminals without taking into account the interests of the country that extradites them. Therefore, a reverse phenomenon is occurring.
The great drug traffickers prefer to be extradited to the U.S. because there they have the possibility of trials with a low profile, negotiating benign convictions, and even retaining an important part of the fortunes obtained through their criminal activities.
Actually, in the majority of cases, information provided by local drug lords that can serve to attack local criminal structures is not shared in an official manner with the Dominican Republic.
Extradition should be an instrument of cooperation between nations in the fight against crime, not a mechanism to mock the judicial and social sanctions of the Dominican Republic. Something is failing, and it must be fixed.
Durante años la extradición a Estados Unidos se tenÃa como un arma intimidante contra los grandes narcotraficantes, pues se entendÃa que en esa jurisdicción se enfrentaban a jueces más duros, sanciones más drásticas y a las mayores posibilidades de guardar prisión sin privilegio por los delitos y el daño cometido contra las sociedades.
Al parecer a Estados Unidos sólo le interesa resolver sus asuntos, sin importar que los crÃmenes o el daño cometido en las sociedades de donde proceden los extraditados sean purgados.
Negocian con los criminales extraditados sin tomar en cuenta los intereses del paÃs que extradita.
Está ocurriendo entonces un fenómeno inverso.
Los grandes narcotraficantes prefieren ser extraditados a Estados Unidos, pues allà tienen la posibilidad de juicios con bajo perfil, negociar condenas benignas y hasta retener parte importante de las fortunas obtenidas con sus actividades criminales.
Incluso, en la generalidad de los casos no se comparte de manera oficial con República Dominicana las informaciones suministradas por esos capos que pudieran servir para atacar las estructuras criminales locales. Son acuerdos desventajosos y obliga a que haya un replanteamiento.
La extradición debe ser un instrumento de cooperación entre las naciones en el combate del crimen, no un mecanismo para burlar las sanciones judiciales y sociales dominicanas.
Algo está fallando y hay que corregirlo.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
What happened to this performing arts center is paradigmatic of how Trump’s second presidency ... [is] another front in a war ... to impose an autocratic regime led by a 21st century feudal lord outside of international law.
Venezuela is likely to become another wasted crisis, resembling events that followed when the U.S. forced regime changes in Libya, Afghanistan and Iraq.
What happened to this performing arts center is paradigmatic of how Trump’s second presidency ... [is] another front in a war ... to impose an autocratic regime led by a 21st century feudal lord outside of international law.