American Double Standards Messing Up the World

Published in Wen Wei Po
(Hong Kong) on 18 March 2014
by Editorial (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Daniel Chow . Edited by Bora Mici.
The Crimean referendum has ended with 96.6 percent of voters assenting that Crimea join the Russian Federation. The United States stated that it supported Ukrainian independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity, emphasizing that the Crimean referendum was in violation of the Ukrainian constitution, and that the U.S. would not accept the referendum. In reality, the very party that caused the crisis is actually the West, with the U.S. in the lead, which persistently pushed for the eastward expansion of NATO and directly interfering in Ukrainian domestic politics. The United States, with its unilateralism, has practiced double standards on sovereign territory issues, wantonly advocating for multiple countries to carry out "color revolutions," not only causing those countries to fall into the upheaval of disintegration, but also disrupting world peace.

The root cause of the current crisis in Ukraine is that the U.S. has vigorously pushed for the eastward expansion of NATO, at the same time aggressively drawing Ukraine into joining the European Union, eventually causing a fierce confrontation between the political factions in Ukraine with different stands. The Permanent Representative of China to the United Nations pointed out in the U.N. Security Council that "foreign intervention is the main cause of the conflict in Ukraine. This has caused massive material damage for that country." The U.S. and the West bear unavoidable responsibility for the current chaotic situation in Ukraine. The best way to resolve the crisis is through communication and negotiation between all parties to appropriately handle their differences in order to prevent adding fuel to the fire. As President of the People’s Republic of China Xi Jinping emphasized when he recently talked to Obama on the phone to discuss the problem in Ukraine, the situation in Ukraine is extremely complex. The matter at hand is for all parties to remain calm and controlled in order to prevent an escalation of tensions and insist on resolving the crisis through political and diplomatic means.

In the face of the recent Crimean referendum caused by the crisis in Ukraine, the U.S. and the West have toyed with double standards on respecting the sovereign territorial integrity issues of other countries. This time, the U.S. and the West want Ukraine to undergo a change of government and become the cat’s-paw in the western faction to challenge Russia. Now, they are unwilling to resign themselves to being in a disadvantaged position in this tussle, so they are now desperately saying they will defend Ukraine’s sovereign territorial integrity, pointing out that the separation of Crimea from Ukraine is in violation of international laws. However, on the 2008 Kosovo issue, the West insisted that "human rights are more important than sovereignty," and strongly pushed for the Kosovar independence referendum; in 2010, the International Court of Justice in The Hague arbitrated that Kosovo’s unilateral declaration of independence was in compliance with international laws.

The West’s double standards on sovereign territory issues is even more apparent with China’s Tibet and Xinjiang issues, continuing to support Tibetan and East Turkistan separatist forces. Recently, President Obama even met with the representative of Tibetan separatism, the Dalai Lama in the White House, despite strong opposition from China. The U.S. and the West have behaved paradoxically when it comes to the sovereign territorial integrity issues of other countries, practicing double standards and fully showing their hypocrisy.

The U.S. thinks that by manipulating sovereign territory issues of other countries, it can use this to set up "color revolutions," making countries all over the world accept American-style democracy, with the U.S. as the leader. But in reality, it is exactly because of wanton disregard of the U.S. in interfering in the matters of other countries that has not only not brought democracy and prosperity, but on the contrary, has caused countries like Iraq, Afghanistan and many Middle Eastern countries to fall into unending war and suffering, and will eventually damage U.S. interests.


克里米亞公投結束,96.6%的投票者贊成克里米亞加入俄聯邦。美國表示,支持烏克蘭獨立、主權和領土完整,強調克里米亞公投違反烏克蘭憲法,美國不接受公投。實際上,導致烏克蘭分裂的危機,始作俑者正是以美國為首的西方不遺餘力推動北約東擴,直接插手烏克蘭內政。美國以單邊主義,在主權領土問題上實行雙重標準,對多國肆意鼓吹策動「顏色革命」,不僅使有關國家陷入分崩離析的動亂之中,更破壞世界的和諧安寧。

此次烏克蘭危機的根源,在於近年美國大力推動北約東擴,同時積極拉攏烏克蘭加入歐盟,結果引發烏克蘭不同立場的政治派別激烈對抗,最終造成國家分裂。中國常駐聯合國代表在聯合國安理會指出:「外國干預是烏克蘭衝突爆發的主要原因。這為該國造成了極大的物質損失。」烏克蘭當前的混亂局勢,美國及西方的介入插手負有不可推卸的責任。化解危機最好的辦法,還是各方以溝通和協調妥善處理分歧,避免火上澆油。正如中國國家主席習近平日前與美國總統奧巴馬通電話,討論烏克蘭問題時強調,烏克蘭形勢十分複雜,當務之急是各方保持冷靜克制,避免局勢進一步緊張升級,要堅持通過政治和外交途徑解決危機。

面對烏克蘭危機引發的此次克里米亞公投,美國和西方在尊重別國主權領土完整問題上玩弄雙重標準。此次美國和西方要令烏克蘭變天,成為西方陣營挑戰俄羅斯的馬前卒,現在又不甘在角力中處於下風,於是聲嘶力竭地說要捍衛烏克蘭的主權領土完整,指摘克里米亞脫離烏克蘭違反國際法。可是,2008年在科索沃問題上,西方強調「人權高於主權」,強力推動科索沃公投獨立;2010年海牙國際法庭更裁決科索沃的單方面宣布獨立符合國際法。

西方在主權領土問題持雙重標準,在中國的西藏、新疆問題上更為明顯,持續支持「藏獨」、「疆獨」勢力。最近美國總統奧巴馬更不顧中方的強烈反對,在白宮接見了「藏獨」的代表人物達賴喇嘛。美國和西方在別國主權領土完整問題上自相矛盾,雙重標準,充分暴露其虛偽性。

美國以為將別國的主權領土問題操控於股掌,就可借此對不同價值觀的國家大搞「顏色革命」,令世界各國都接受美式民主,唯其馬首是瞻。但事實上,正因為美國的肆意妄為,插手別國的事務,不但沒有為這些國家帶來民主繁榮,反而造成伊拉克、阿富汗以及中東不少國家陷入無休止的戰亂苦難,而且,最終也會損害美國的利益。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Spain: The New American Realism

Turkey: Conflicting Messages to Syria: US Supports Integrity while Israel Attacks

Japan: The Role of a Diplomatic Attitude To Maintain the International Order

China: Blind Faith in US ‘Security Commitments’ Is Short-Sighted

Israel: Epstein Conspiracy: When the Monster Has a Life of Its Own and Rises Up

Topics

Russia: The Issue of Weapons Has Come to the Forefront*

Colombia: How Much Longer?

Germany: Tariffs? Terrific!

Spain: The New American Realism

Mexico: Trump vs. Cuba: More of the Same

Ireland: US Tariffs Take Shine Off Summer Economic Statement

Israel: Epstein Conspiracy: When the Monster Has a Life of Its Own and Rises Up

Related Articles

Hong Kong: Foreign Media Warn US Brand Reputation Veering toward ‘Collapse’ under Trump Policy Impact

Hong Kong: The Lessons of World War II: The Real World Importance of Resisting Hegemony

Hong Kong: Can US Tariffs Targeting Hong Kong’s ‘Very Survival’ Really Choke the Life out of It?

Hong Kong: What Makes US Trade War More Dangerous than 2008 Crisis: Trump

Hong Kong: China, Japan, South Korea Pave Way for Summit Talks; Liu Teng-Chung: Responding to Trump