The Time is Now to Rope in America

Published in Sankei News
(Japan) on 3 June 2014
by Reiichi Ishida (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Dan Schilling. Edited by Bora Mici  .
U.S. President Barack Obama’s recent speech on foreign policy at the U.S. Military Academy was hardly surprising. The president stated that “the United States will use military force, unilaterally if necessary, when our core interests demand it: when our people are threatened; when our livelihoods are at stake; when the security of our allies is in danger”—a clear declaration that America intends to protect its allies.

On the other hand, he also pointed out his concern that “regional aggression that goes unchecked, whether in southern Ukraine or the South China Sea or anywhere else in the world, will ultimately impact our allies, and could draw in our military.” In the New York Times International Edition, one commenter said that “President Obama is emphasizing his belief that the U.S. must avoid becoming embroiled in a quagmire of international crises.”*

After coming through two wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, a sense of combat fatigue is palpable all over American society. But even during this period of inward focus, the U.S. is concerned over whether the Senkaku Islands issue will boil over into a crisis. At a joint press conference with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe in April, President Obama, in reference to the Senkaku Islands, became the first president to apply Article 5 of the Peace Treaty of San Francisco to a specific issue. However, at that same press conference, the president was directly questioned on the Senkaku issue by an American journalist:

“Are you saying that the U.S. would consider using military force, were China to have some sort of military incursion in those islands, to protect those islands?” The president chose not to answer directly, saying only that “it would be a profound mistake to continue to see escalation around this issue, rather than dialogue and confidence-building measures between Japan and China.”

In Liberal Democratic Party Secretary General Shigeru Ishiba’s recent publication, “An Introduction to ‘The Right to Collective Defense’ for Japanese People,” he states, “In the case of an emergency, it will be necessary for Japan to pursue a policy which seeks to actively ‘rope in’ America.” Particularly with respect to the Senkaku Islands, it seems we’re in an age where America gets roped in, and Japan does the roping.

If the hypothetical posed in the reporter’s question becomes a reality, even on a small scale, regardless of whether the U.S. military openly supports Japan’s Self-Defense Force, roping in America would be absolutely vital to defusing the situation. Even so, it’s irritating that we’ve spent the last 60 years living under the San Francisco Peace Treaty and still people question whether we should involve America. We’re a half century behind the times, and it’s flabbergasting.

*Editor's note: This quotation could not be verified.


オバマ米大統領が最近、陸軍士官学校の卒業式で行った外交政策の演説でやっぱり、と思った。

 大統領は「米国は核心的利益が求めるとき-国民が脅かされ…同盟諸国の安全保障が危ういとき-必要なら単独で武力を行使する」と同盟国の安全も守ると言明した。

 一方で、「地域の侵略が野放しになれば-ウクライナ南部であれ南シナ海であれ…結局、同盟諸国に衝撃を与え米軍を巻き込みかねない」との懸念も示したのである。

 「オバマ氏は米国が…国際危機の泥沼に巻き込まれるのは避けるべきだとの確信を強めている」。米紙ニューヨーク・タイムズ国際版に載った演説解説の一節である。

 氏の考え方はアフガニスタン、イラクと「2つの戦争」を経て厭戦(えんせん)気分が覆う米社会も反映している。そんな内向き米国が危機の発火点になると案じるのが尖閣諸島だ。

 尖閣について、オバマ氏は4月の日米首脳共同記者会見で、米大統領として初めて「日米安保条約第5条の適用対象」と宣言した。

 が、同じ会見で「中国が諸島に何らかの軍事侵攻をしたら、米国は諸島を守るため武力行使を検討するのか」という米人記者の質問には直接答えず、「日中の対話と信頼醸成」を強調するにとどまった。

 石破茂自民党幹事長は近著『日本人のための「集団的自衛権」入門』で、「日本有事の際には常にアメリカを『巻き込む』という積極的な発想こそが必要」と唱える。

 尖閣に関しては特に、時代は今、「米国が巻き込まれ論で日本が巻き込み論」のようにみえる。

 先の質問の仮定が小規模で現実化し、防戦する自衛隊を米軍が直接支援するか否かはともかく、そうした事態を抑止するためにも米国を「巻き込む」ことは不可欠だ。

 それなのに、集団的自衛権の行使容認に対し60年安保時の巻き込まれ論風の批判が喧(かまびす)しい。半世紀もの時代遅れにただ呆然(ぼうぜん)である。(論説副委員長 西田令一)
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Austria: The US Courts Are the Last Bastion of Resistance

       

Austria: Donald Is Disappointed in Vladimir

Spain: Trump, Xi and the Art of Immortality

Japan: US Signing of Japan Tariffs: Reject Self-Righteousness and Fulfill Agreement

Israel: Antisemitism and Anti-Israel Bias: Congress Opens Investigation into Wikipedia

Topics

Japan: US Signing of Japan Tariffs: Reject Self-Righteousness and Fulfill Agreement

Russia: Trump the Multipolarist*

Turkey: Blood and Fury: Killing of Charlie Kirk, Escalating US Political Violence

Thailand: Brazil and the US: Same Crime, Different Fate

Singapore: The Assassination of Charlie Kirk Leaves America at a Turning Point

Germany: When Push Comes to Shove, Europe Stands Alone*

Guatemala: Fanaticism and Intolerance

Venezuela: China: Authoritarianism Unites, Democracy Divides

Related Articles

Japan: US Signing of Japan Tariffs: Reject Self-Righteousness and Fulfill Agreement

Nigeria: 80 Years after Hiroshima, Nagasaki Atomic Bombings: Any Lesson?

Taiwan: Trump’s Japan Negotiation Strategy: Implications for Taiwan

India: Trump’s Tariffs Have Hit South Korea and Japan: India Has Been Wise in Charting a Cautious Path

Japan: Iran Ceasefire Agreement: The Danger of Peace by Force