The United States and the Air Attack

Published in El Comercio
(Ecuador) on 25 September 2014
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Sean P. Hunter. Edited by Laurence Bouvard.
The president of the United States has made a decision. He began the bombardment of the areas taken by force by the terrorist group Islamic State. The first attack was in Syrian territory and other military objectives were centered in Iraq. In both countries, the impact caused by the terrorist group — death, destruction, occupation and control — has been significant.

Syria confronts the Sunni group from the viewpoint of a tyrannical, secular government. Various rebel groups in this bloody civil war are of a religious orientation. The cost of this war, which did not end when the Islamic State group suddenly announced the budding caliphate, is around 300,000 dead.

For Iraq, the situation is particularly complicated, now that its military apparatus has been destroyed by American soldiers in the occupation to overthrow Saddam Hussein. The allied government sent out another SOS to Washington before the appearance of the Islamic State group.

For President Barack Obama the disastrous decision, hastened by the beheadings that were committed by the terrorist group, puts him once again at the forefront of another military invasion, this time an air campaign with bombardments that seek to weaken the Islamic State group’s strategic position and score another geopolitical win. European allies and other neighboring countries have joined in with this plan.

Obama, who worked to take troops out of the Middle East, returns to war in the face of criticism by his Republican opponents, who demanded timely and straightforward action.


El Presidente de los Estados Unidos tomó una decisión. Empezó el bombardeo a los sitios ocupados por la fuerza por el grupo terrorista Estado Islámico (EI).

El primer ataque fue en territorio sirio y otros objetivos militares se centraron en Iraq. En ambos Estados, los estragos causados por el grupo terrorista -la muerte, la destrucción, la ocupación y el control- han sido significativos.

Siria enfrenta al grupo sunita desde la visión de una nación con Gobierno tiránico laico. Varios de los grupos rebeldes de su sangrienta guerra civil son de orientación religiosa. La factura de esa guerra, que no terminó cuando sobrevino el anuncio del califato en ciernes desde el Estado Islámico, es de 300 000 muertos.

Para Iraq, la situación es particularmente compleja, ya que su aparato militar fue destruido por los soldados estadounidenses en la ocupación para derrocar a Saddam Hussein. El Gobierno aliado ha lanzado otro SOS a Washington ante la aparición del EI.

Para el presidente Barack Obama, la decisión fatal, precipitada por las decapitaciones del grupo terrorista, lo vuelven a poner al frente de otra incursión militar, esta vez aérea, con bombardeos que buscan debilitar la posición estratégica de EI y marcar otra cancha geopolítica. A esta tesis se suman aliados europeos y otros países vecinos.

Obama, quien bregó por sacar las tropas de Oriente Próximo, vuelve a la guerra frente a las críticas de sus opositores republicanos que demandaban una acción frontal y oportuna.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Japan: Quad Solidarity: Do Not Backpedal on China Deterrence

Colombia: The Global Game: China Advances, but the United States Still Sets the Pace

Austria: In His Blunt Manner, Vance Comes to Netanyahu’s Aid

Malaysia: US and China Will See a Breakthrough in Their Trade Ties at APEC: Here’s Why

South Africa: What South Africa’s Progressives Can Learn from Zohran Mamdani’s Victory in New York City

Topics

Egypt: American Mobilization in Israel

Austria: Trump Is Basically Governing Solo — for How Much Longer?

Germany: Harris Doesn’t Get It

Jordan: Why Did the US Vice President Cry?

South Africa: What South Africa’s Progressives Can Learn from Zohran Mamdani’s Victory in New York City

Bangladesh: Rare Earth Elements Are the New Drivers of Global Power

Nigeria: Electricity Will Decide the AI Race

Japan: Quad Solidarity: Do Not Backpedal on China Deterrence

Related Articles

Hong Kong: Trump’s Obsession with the Nobel Peace Prize Is a Farce

India: Trump vs Judiciary: Will US Power Balance Shift?

Ireland: Obama’s Silence on Gaza Makes Freedom of Dublin Award Deeply Problematic

China: White House Peddling Snake Oil as Medicine