With the explicit intention of torpedoing the progress of negotiations being held by the U.S. with Iran so that Iran freezes its nuclear program for 10 years in exchange for the cessation of certain sanctions, and against President Barack Obama's will, Prime Minister of Israel Benjamin Netanyahu, addressed the U.S. Congress.


It was an unusual visit, due to the evident intention of ingratiating himself with the opposition of a government, which, despite everything, continues to be his great ally. It is a move that opens a chapter of unprecedented tension in a relationship which has always been characterized by its good countenance.


Republicans opened the doors for him; they are the majority in Congress and are very interested in being a stick in the wheel of progress of the plans the Democrat president has for his second term on foreign policy issues. Initially, it was a win-win situation.


During his intervention, the Israeli prime minister did not spare any darts aimed at a possible understanding between both governments. He reaffirmed his fierce opposition to a possible agreement, in a posture that more than a few associated with the need to harden the tone, with his country's parliamentary re-elections coming up on March 17. In this light, there is no doubt he managed to sweet talk his electorate as well as the Republicans.
But what the world is really interested in is that the dialogue between the U.S. and Iran started a new cycle this Thursday in Switzerland. And this time different than before, popular support of Obama's current administration has skyrocketed, according to a poll from the University of Maryland, quoted by The New York Times. Moreover, the possibility of harsher sanctions for Iran, a decision that would require the support of Democrat lawmakers, is unraveling for Netanyahu. He convinced the ones who were already convinced, but without fulfilling his great objective. A balance which many on this planet watch with satisfaction, for no matter how many doubts the effort generates, the sensible thing to do is to explore and exhaust the paths of dialogue with Iran.
Con la intención expresa de torpedear el avance de las negociaciones que Estados Unidos sostiene con Irán para que este paÃs congele durante diez años su programa nuclear a cambio del cese de algunas sanciones, y contra la voluntad del presidente Barack Obama, el primer ministro de Israel, BenjamÃn Netanyahu, se dirigió al Congreso estadounidense.
Le abrieron las puertas los republicanos, que son mayorÃa en el Congreso y que están muy interesados en ser palo en la rueda del avance de los planes que para su segundo mandato tiene el Presidente demócrata en materia de polÃtica exterior. Era, en principio, un gana-gana.
Pero lo que de verdad le interesa al mundo es que los diálogos entre Estados Unidos e Irán comenzaron un nuevo ciclo este jueves, en Suiza. Con la diferencia, respecto al anterior, de que el apoyo popular a esta gestión de Obama se disparó, según encuesta de la Universidad de Maryland citada por The New York Times. Asà mismo, la posibilidad de sanciones más severas para Irán, decisión para la cual necesitarÃa el apoyo de los legisladores demócratas, se le embolata a Netanyahu. Convenció a los convencidos, pero sin cumplir su gran objetivo. Balance que muchos en el planeta ven con satisfacción, pues, por más dudas que genere tal esfuerzo, lo sensato es explorar y agotar los caminos del diálogo con Irán.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
Venezuela is likely to become another wasted crisis, resembling events that followed when the U.S. forced regime changes in Libya, Afghanistan and Iraq.
Venezuela is likely to become another wasted crisis, resembling events that followed when the U.S. forced regime changes in Libya, Afghanistan and Iraq.
We are faced with a "scenario" in which Washington's exclusive and absolute dominance over the entire hemisphere, from Greenland and Canada in the north to the southern reaches of Argentina and Chile.
Washington is no longer content with slow exhaustion; it has adopted a strategy of swift, symbolic strikes designed to recalibrate the international landscape.
It would be a mistake to assume that Netanyahu dictates Trump’s Middle East agenda. It would also be a mistake to allow Netanyahu to tailor American priorities to Israel’s political and military actions in Gaza, Lebanon, and Syria.