Disregarding denunciations of opportunism as well as the implicit affront toward the White House, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu brought to a close the objective set forth by both the strategists of his own party, Likud, and the Republican opposition in the U.S. Netanyahu addressed Congress in a formal session from which numerous Democratic congressmen and women were absent, including Joe Biden, who presides over the Senate.
Although its main topics were international in scope — negotiations with Iran over its nuclear program — Netanyahu’s speech showed deep concern with the political rapport between Israel and the U.S. Netanyahu addressed representatives of Congress and the Senate just two weeks before the Israeli people are set to cast their ballots in an election in which, polls indicate, the right-wing Likud (Netanyahu’s party) and the center-left Zionist Union coalition are neck and neck. In this way, the speech delivered in Washington became a huge electoral event on the part of the prime minister — an event that was, incidentally, attended by American billionaire Sheldon Adelson, his biggest campaign contributor and owner of Israel’s most popular newspaper.
This political opportunism was twofold. Netanyahu needlessly snubbed the U.S. president — the same president who, as Netanyahu put it, continuously helps Israel. This intervention on Netanyahu’s part was machinated against Barack Obama by the Republican majority in Congress, who accuse the president of weakness in regard to foreign policy. Many Republicans applauded the Israeli guest with more enthusiasm than they applauded the president during his State of the Union address. Netanyahu is playing a role that allows the Israeli voter to regard him as a privileged interlocutor with the most powerful country on earth and Israel’s ally. We will have to observe the White House’s next decisions to gauge what kind of damage his actions have caused.
Having said this, the prime minister is right in attributing great importance to the agreement currently in negotiation with Iran. This is an agreement that should admit no error, as it will determine the stability of the Middle East and global nuclear equilibrium. Reason enough to not let it get tainted with political matters between the U.S. and Israel.
Aunque el asunto principal tuvo que ver con el escenario internacional —las negociaciones con Irán sobre su proyecto nuclear— la intervención estuvo marcada profundamente por la polÃtica de Israel y la de EE UU. Netanyahu se dirigió a los congresistas y senadores justo dos semanas antes de que los israelÃes acudan a las urnas en unos comicios en los que las encuestas apuntan a un ajustado resultado entre el derechista Likud —el partido de Netanyahu— y la coalición de centro izquierda Unión Sionista. El discurso de Washington se convirtió asà en un gran acto electoral del primer ministro, al que asistió, por cierto, el multimillonario estadounidense Sheldon Adelson, el mayor donante de su campaña y dueño del periódico más leÃdo de Israel.
Pero el oportunismo electoralista fue doble. Netanyahu desairó innecesariamente al presidente de EE UU (que, tal y como dijo el propio primer ministro, ayuda constantemente a Israel): la intervención fue diseñada por la mayorÃa republicana en el Congreso contra Barack Obama, al que acusa de debilidad en cuestiones de polÃtica internacional. Y muchos republicanos aplaudieron con mayor entusiasmo al invitado de ayer que a su propio presidente en el reciente discurso del estado de la Unión. Netanyahu se ha prestado al juego que le permite exhibirse ante el votante israelà como un interlocutor privilegiado con el paÃs más poderoso de la Tierra, y aliado de Israel. Habrá que evaluar el daño que ha causado su apuesta en próximas decisiones de la Casa Blanca.
Dicho esto, no le falta razón al primer ministro al atribuir una extraordinaria importancia al acuerdo que se negocia con Irán. Es un pacto en el que no puede haber errores de cálculo, porque está en juego la estabilidad en Oriente Próximo y el equilibrio nuclear mundial. Razón de más para no mezclarlo con asuntos polÃticos norteamericanos e israelÃes.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
The message is unmistakable: there are no absolute guarantees and state sovereignty is conditional when it clashes with the interests of powerful states.
Venezuela is likely to become another wasted crisis, resembling events that followed when the U.S. forced regime changes in Libya, Afghanistan and Iraq.
We are faced with a "scenario" in which Washington's exclusive and absolute dominance over the entire hemisphere, from Greenland and Canada in the north to the southern reaches of Argentina and Chile.
It would be a mistake to assume that Netanyahu dictates Trump’s Middle East agenda. It would also be a mistake to allow Netanyahu to tailor American priorities to Israel’s political and military actions in Gaza, Lebanon, and Syria.