The Las Vegas shooting demonstrates once again the need for gun control laws
Nearly 60 people were killed and more than 500 others wounded in the shooting attack late Monday in Las Vegas, when Stephen Paddock, a 64-year-old white man, opened fire on a crowd of 22,000 people attending a concert. It is the largest deadly incident of its type in modern U.S. history. Unfortunately, it is not an isolated event and everything leads one to believe that it will not be the last.
Organizations demanding gun control in the U.S. place shooting attacks that have four or more fatalities under a mass shooting category. Usually, the annual death toll is 121, but this year alone, there have been 273 events that fit this category.
It is a truly deadly epidemic – it cannot be ignored that there are more weapons than people in the United States – caused by a completely misleading interpretation of the right to bear arms, which was incorporated into the U.S. Constitution in 1791.
It should not be necessary to remind those who object to gun control that the United States has changed much since then, but unfortunately that is not the case. In fact, the shooting in Las Vegas happened while Congress was in Washington, D.C., making plans to discuss a Republican bill that would make it easier to buy firearm silencers. It does not require much imagination to conclude what would have happened in the famous city in Nevada if the spectators had not even heard the burst of bullets of an automatic rifle from the window of a building.
President Trump has just suffered the worst catastrophe during his tenure thus far. Hurricanes cannot be avoided, but shootings can.
Epidemia mortal nos Estados Unidos
Tiroteio de Las Vegas demonstra mais uma vez a necessidade de leis de controle de armas
Trata-se de uma verdadeira epidemia mortal – não se pode ignorar que nos EUA existem mais armas que habitantes – causada por uma interpretação completamente equivocada do direito ao porte de armas introduzido na Constituição norte-americana em 1791.
We are faced with a "scenario" in which Washington's exclusive and absolute dominance over the entire hemisphere, from Greenland and Canada in the north to the southern reaches of Argentina and Chile.
Venezuela is likely to become another wasted crisis, resembling events that followed when the U.S. forced regime changes in Libya, Afghanistan and Iraq.
Venezuela is likely to become another wasted crisis, resembling events that followed when the U.S. forced regime changes in Libya, Afghanistan and Iraq.
We are faced with a "scenario" in which Washington's exclusive and absolute dominance over the entire hemisphere, from Greenland and Canada in the north to the southern reaches of Argentina and Chile.